Look into it, she did not reject it… She asked to be briefed on an issue she saw with the deal relating to separation of powers.
Who said the Judge wouldn't accept the Hunter Plea?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Look into it, she did not reject it… She asked to be briefed on an issue she saw with the deal relating to separation of powers.
evince
Truthmatters
Are you sure?
evince
Truthmatters
Cocaine Hunter, the son of the president of the US, did not pay all of his taxes due.
Both whistleblowers testified that Hunter Biden owes $145,000 in unpaid taxes on $400,000 of income from 2014. Due to DOJ’s slow walking, the statute of limitations expired, allowing Hunter Biden to get away with this tax evasion.
The testimony was after the plea bargain.
Both whistleblowers testified that Hunter Biden owes $145,000 in unpaid taxes on $400,000 of income from 2014. Due to DOJ’s slow walking, the statute of limitations expired, allowing Hunter Biden to get away with this tax evasion.
The testimony was after the plea bargain.
Nobody get too excited.
One of two things.
As long as the words "still under investigation" are in effect, the DOJ, FBI, and IRS will not answer any questions regarding this crackhead's investigation or charges relating to the Big Guy. Thus protecting the entire family again.
or
The people pulling Brandon's strings have figured out he cannot win and this is the way to dump that old fool.
One of two things.
As long as the words "still under investigation" are in effect, the DOJ, FBI, and IRS will not answer any questions regarding this crackhead's investigation or charges relating to the Big Guy. Thus protecting the entire family again.
or
The people pulling Brandon's strings have figured out he cannot win and this is the way to dump that old fool.
None of them were on here saying that "it would be unusual for a judge to reject this plea" like you were. So, it would be difficult to "call them out" for being craptacularly poor at predictions like you were trying to do.
You should notice that I simply waited for an outcome before talking about it... Since I wasn't predicting anything, you weren't "calling me out" and I assumed you were talking about someone else.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
1. NOT a rightwinger
2. never denied that there is systemic racism in certain geographical areas of our country
SmarterthanYou
rebel
just because I pointed out blacks, doesn't mean race was the ONLY issue.........
anyone not realizing the 2 tiered justice system is only displaying willful ignorance of the elite attitudes of elected officials and the bureaucracy aligned against us.
nope - Hunters position as a a liberal shit stain was the distinction.
you just made a dumb assumption
And we can be sure, because he is faulting how Hunter is not in jail, not how black people are
hundreds of black men sitting in a jail cell for the same gun crime that hunter committed
He has paid what he is charged with. Their might later be more charges, but what he was being sentenced on... was based on the current charges. Why do I always have to explain things like you guys are 2 year olds?
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Well, then it's very unusual because the judge DID reject it.
Hunter Biden pleads not guilty after plea deal derailed
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...p&cvid=aa6c29fe48ac4618b36e07b52e4fc0cc&ei=29
This was particularly true of the gun charge where the judge questioned defense lawyers as well as the prosecution about why it wasn't charged at all versus the usual felony charge given for this particular crime.
It is unusual for her to delay a plea like she did today. I made no prediction. You want me to make a mistake so badly. There were plenty of "them" screaming about how the judge would reject the deal today.
I must have done a thousand plea deals in my time as a prosecutor, I bet less than 5 were rescheduled.
But the plea has not been accepted or rejected, the judge took no action on it today and asked the lawyers to brief her on a small standard issue relating to the plea.
Stop dancing on the head of the pin "counselor" cough!
I did not say that he had not paid what he was charged with.
Pay attention, he has not paid the 145K on the 400K from 2014. It was slow walked to pass the statute of limitations.
He is walking around with 145K in his pocket that is owed to the American people.
One would think that his father, the top executive in the US, would tell his crooked son to pay up but Joe is crooked too.
Why do I always have to explain things like you guys are 2 year olds?
Last edited:
evince
Truthmatters
It’s her ruling you fucking idiot
She did not reject it
She told them to get together and work it out and get back to her
You clearly inferred they had categorically poor predictive skills and replaced them with "highly unusual". Pretending the rest of the board cannot see that you were predicting that the Judge would simply accept this like the "usual" ones do is simply sad posturing.
What we know to be true is:
1. One of us created a thread "calling out" folks that supposedly predicted what that person clearly indicated they thought would not happen because it would be "highly unusual".
2. It was not me.
3. One of us waited until we had a result before talking about the subject, mostly because they were somewhat interested and didn't feel that it would be so "highly unusual" when there are still ongoing investigations going on (only because the one trial where that person saw a plea deal going down that was rejected was because there were more investigations going on, clearly that person didn't feel he was expert).
4. The person in number 3 was not you.
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
From the tone of the article, it looks like it's been torpedoed to me.