It was slow walked, deliberately, per the two IRS investigators.
This allowed Cocaine Hunter to avoid paying 145K in taxes that he owed.
He still has not paid that 145K.
Who said the Judge wouldn't accept the Hunter Plea?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
It was slow walked, deliberately, per the two IRS investigators.
This allowed Cocaine Hunter to avoid paying 145K in taxes that he owed.
He still has not paid that 145K.
I don't really care about Hunter. I do care about the connection between Brandon selling out his country and taking bribes through his crackhead son. As for Mr.Taking Showers with his daughter? God can sort that out.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Evince...
Let's summarize:
Cocaine Hunter and his family received 17.3 million from foreign entities while Joe was VP.
He hid the income and was charged and forced to pay taxes.
He still owes 145K that can't be collected because his case was slow walked to run out the statute of limitations.
The American people are aware of this and the far left Democratic Socialists have some decisions to make.
Cocaine Hunter and his family received 17.3 million from foreign entities while Joe was VP.
He hid the income and was charged and forced to pay taxes.
He still owes 145K that can't be collected because his case was slow walked to run out the statute of limitations.
The American people are aware of this and the far left Democratic Socialists have some decisions to make.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
The whistleblowers say Bagman wasn't paying taxes, lied on what forms and years he did pay on some of his taxes, and this was ongoing from variously 2012 -2014 to 2019. But the IRS and DOJ could only get him for two years because of their foot dragging.
Evince...
I skim on past that bottom feeder's posts.
The Judge did!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
She's what you get when you do drugs boys and girls...
Hunter and his illegal bribes are tied at the waist to his corrupt father.
This crime family has been exposed to the American people and the Dems. have a very large decision to make.
The Speaker has already referenced the dreaded I word (impeachment).
It is past due.
I have full confidence that the Grand Architect will sort out the ""showers with his daughter" issues.
You can infer a prediction if you would like, but I am very careful with my words and did not predict anything. I gave a factual assessment of the reality of such situations.
The board is full of silly predictions, by whack job, Republicans, you never point that out. Instead you pretend to find predictions where they do not exist.
You should read the transcripts, no plea was not rejected and the result of the hearing delayed, but not because there are other investigations.
You again just say nonsense. I clearly told you one thing then you pretend it was another.
I didn't say that was why this deal went south, I said that was why it happened on the one trial where I saw a plea rejected that it was stated that way during the explanations for that one trial. Hence I didn't think it would be quite as "unusual" as you did, but remained silent because I did not feel I was expert having seen a plea rejected only one time.
The reality: Noting that they predicted something and implying how you didn't think it would happen because it would be "highly unusual" is you predicting that they would be wrong. In this case, you were wrong.
The judge seemed skeptical of referring him to treatment instead of prosecuting him was the right thing to do. While you try to back away from your original prediction and pretend that this was something that was "highly unusual", I simply raise an eyebrow and wonder what you will say when you are wrong on your next prediction.
Your "careful" consideration of your words wasn't good enough. You (wrongly) predicted the failure of other (imaginary it seems as you had not even one actual prediction just a vague "you guys that said this") folks' predictions, that is in itself a prediction.
FOX News is reporting that the judge won’t accept the Hunter Biden plea deal.
Also that the DOJ Prosecutor confirms an “ongoing” probe surrounding Hunter Biden.”
This has to be posted because the MSM isn’t airing it and I don’t want the far left loons to remain ignorant.
Also that the DOJ Prosecutor confirms an “ongoing” probe surrounding Hunter Biden.”
This has to be posted because the MSM isn’t airing it and I don’t want the far left loons to remain ignorant.
Oh, they will remain ignorant anyway (see? that's a prediction there, Jarod), purposefully so.
QP!
Verified User
The judge did not reject it based on any of the agreements in it and did so just based on a technical question in the way both sides lawyers worded the agreement.
The summary is that it was 'agreed if Hunter did not comply with Probation and fulfill all requirements, he would then be open again to these charges. But they said the judge would, at the time decide which of the charges and sentence applied to his breech. The judge has said that asking a judge to consider which charges are applicable, seems to be a breach of 'separation of powers' as it is the DoJ or Prosecutors who decide what charges apply. She wants them to reconsider and come back and brief her on that question'.
The fix is simply for the prosecutor and defense to define which charges would apply to any breach(s) and resubmit the deal.
Indeed.
I’m growing s bit weary of having to inform and educate these ignorant, uninformed loons.
They should have watched the IRS whistleblower hearings on FOX and their reporting today.
QP!
Verified User
From Hunter's perspective there is no way he should do a deal that leaves elements open for Trump or any GOP derp who follows simply to put him through all this again by relaunching all the investigations.
He would rather go to court and put an end to these charges one way or the other.
QP!
Verified User
Per the two IRS agents, if slow walked, it was done by Trump and Barr.
Why are they not investigating why Trump and Barr were providing cover to Hunter?
It was fun watching the two IRS investigators completely stutter and stumble when asked on each of their 'allegations' who was POTUS, Trump or Biden at the time.
'Can you repeat the question...'
FLOL
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Deja Taylor was charged last week with illegally using drugs while owning a firearm and making a false statement about using marijuana when she purchased the gun, court records show.
Taylor, who is also charged in state court in connection with the shooting, could have faced up to 25 years in prison on the federal charges, but Taylor’s attorneys settled with prosecutors on an agreement that calls for and 18- to 24-month sentence.