Who said the Judge wouldn't accept the Hunter Plea?

QPI


There only two things you need to know...


(1) The Democrats have already lost the nov 2024 Presidential election.

(2) Donald Trump will definitely win that election.

So you might as well just accept it, and keep your crazy, liberal pie-hole shut.


Thank you for your time.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

(3) All Down Under dumbasses are dingo-fucking losers.
 
It will be great theater to see how the far left Democratic Socialist loons dispose of Slow Joe.

He and his family are the most corrupt occupants ever to inhabit this revered home.

Veremos.
 
The defense has made it clear they won't accept a criminal charge on the gun issue because that would almost certainly be a felony charge while the judge isn't going to accept the diversion program outcome. The defense has also made it clear they won't accept a plea deal that leaves open future possible charges. It isn't going to happen.

Bagman is going to be back in court for these charges and the DOJ is going to have to accept they can't minimize them.

What i did not hear was you accept the bet.

I hear lots of assertions being made as if accurate but without an ounce of confidence in those positions to back them up.

Or do you? Is the bet on?
 
QPI


There are only two things you need to know...


(1) The Democrats have already lost the Nov 2024 Presidential election.

(2) Donald Trump will definitely win that election.

So you might as well just accept it, and keep your crazy, liberal pie-hole shut.


Thank you for your time.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !!

Your TDS is showing.
 
It will be great theater to see how the far left Democratic Socialist loons dispose of Slow Joe.

He and his family are the most corrupt occupants ever to inhabit this revered home.

Veremos.
I expect to see a For Sale sign on the White House lawn any day now
 
You again just say nonsense. I clearly told you one thing then you pretend it was another.

I didn't say that was why this deal went south, I said that was why it happened on the one trial where I saw a plea rejected that it was stated that way during the explanations for that one trial. Hence I didn't think it would be quite as "unusual" as you did, but remained silent because I did not feel I was expert having seen a plea rejected only one time.

The reality: Noting that they predicted something and implying how you didn't think it would happen because it would be "highly unusual" is you predicting that they would be wrong. In this case, you were wrong.

The judge seemed skeptical of referring him to treatment instead of prosecuting him was the right thing to do. While you try to back away from your original prediction and pretend that this was something that was "highly unusual", I simply raise an eyebrow and wonder what you will say when you are wrong on your next prediction.

Your "careful" consideration of your words wasn't good enough. You (wrongly) predicted the failure of other (imaginary it seems as you had not even one actual prediction just a vague "you guys that said this") folks' predictions, that is in itself a prediction.

Not a prediction but an accurate statement that simply IS true.
 
Back
Top