Sotomayor says she's "uniquely American"

Well how about that...

there isn't A DAMN THING WE CAN DO ABOUT IT..

welcome to what used to be the United States of America.

It is very much still the United States of America. Elections were held and enough democrats won to give them a filibuster proof majority.

You want to make it sound as though the democrats have done something bad. They won their elections.

If you want things to change then work to make the changes in the GOP to make it more respresentative of more people, or throw your weight behind a third party.
 
First we're told there ain't a damn thing we can about it..

then we are told to love it or leave it..

I'm beginning to forget where it is I live..
 
First we're told there ain't a damn thing we can about it..

then we are told to love it or leave it..

I'm beginning to forget where it is I live..

You live in a nation that holds elections. The party you prefer lost enough of those elections that they have no ability to stop this nominee from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. That is the fair way and the american way.

As for the "love it or leave it", perhaps this is just being repeated for those who favored the party that said the same thing just a few years ago.
 
You live in a nation that holds elections. The party you prefer lost enough of those elections that they have no ability to stop this nominee from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. That is the fair way and the american way.

As for the "love it or leave it", perhaps this is just being repeated for those who favored the party that said the same thing just a few years ago.

yeah I know, you already said that..I don't think our government was suppose to be set up as having one party overrun the citizens of it's country..but I guess that is where we are headed..
 
then why the dog and pony show? so sheeple can feel that their government works?

anyone need more ammo?

I listened to Graham explain that last night. He still has a responsibility to vote up or down. Before he casts that vote she must be examined, I agree. What he meant is that the partisan left hold the majority so unless she totally blows it (making the dems have to vote her down) she's a shoe in...but his vote is not.

I want my Senator to record their vote based on a full examination, just as I want their vote on legislation that they have read and understand completely...even if many think a brief synopsis is satisfactory I do not.
 
yeah I know, you already said that..I don't think our government was suppose to be set up as having one party overrun the citizens of it's country..but I guess that is where we are headed..

I only repeated it because you seemed to still be complaining about the system that is in place.

If the party in charge does not do what the people want, they will not be reelected and the other party (or other parties) will regain some power.

You are complaining, but it is what the voters wanted.
 
I only repeated it because you seemed to still be complaining about the system that is in place.

If the party in charge does not do what the people want, they will not be reelected and the other party (or other parties) will regain some power.

You are complaining, but it is what the voters wanted.


the polls are showing the citizens in this country do Not want this person seated on the Supreme court..so what do you say about that..we should vote them all out of the country..:pke:
So now we are being governed by mob rules is what you're saying?
 
Last edited:
the polls are showing the citizens in this country do Not want this person seated on the Supreme court..so what do you say about that..we should vote them all out of the country..:pke:
So now we are being governed by mob rules is what you're saying?

Depending on who writes and takes the polls, they can show whatever you want them to show.

The fact is that this is the way our government officials are elected and this is the way Supreme Court Justices are placed on the bench.

Do you want Supreme Court Justices to be placed because of polls?

No, I am not saying we are being governed by mob rules. I am trying to politely point out the problems in your "...what used to be the United States of America" complaints.

If there were a filibuster proof republican majority and a republican president, and the justice in question was clearly pro-gun & anti-abortion, would you be making the same complaints?
 
Depending on who writes and takes the polls, they can show whatever you want them to show.

The fact is that this is the way our government officials are elected and this is the way Supreme Court Justices are placed on the bench.

Do you want Supreme Court Justices to be placed because of polls?

No, I am not saying we are being governed by mob rules. I am trying to politely point out the problems in your "...what used to be the United States of America" complaints.

If there were a filibuster proof republican majority and a republican president, and the justice in question was clearly pro-gun & anti-abortion, would you be making the same complaints?

:rolleyes:
ok you've worn me out..
we now live in a Banana Republic and I guess we might as well just surrender..
 
:rolleyes:
ok you've worn me out..
we now live in a Banana Republic and I guess we might as well just surrender..

We live in the same nation as before. You just want to make it sound as though we have been overrun and are now under a dictatorship.

The rules were the same when republicans had more power, they just lost that power. And, if you were honest, you would admit to the reason they lost the power they had.

But if you want to keep on with the "its not the same country and the people are being abused" nonsense, thats up to you.
 
We live in the same nation as before. You just want to make it sound as though we have been overrun and are now under a dictatorship.

The rules were the same when republicans had more power, they just lost that power. And, if you were honest, you would admit to the reason they lost the power they had.

But if you want to keep on with the "its not the same country and the people are being abused" nonsense, thats up to you.

gee thanks, I'm glad I got your permission..
you keep on those rose colored glasses if you must..
see ya..
 
gee thanks, I'm glad I got your permission..
you keep on those rose colored glasses if you must..
see ya..

My rose colored glasses? The passive-aggressive approach is not working, but if thats the way you choose to discuss things...

You obviously think I am backing Obama and the democrats. I don't recall saying that at all. What I was doing is refuting your "this used to be the United States of America" laments.

If you want to discuss the actual topic I am more than willing. But if not, you have a nice day.
 
My rose colored glasses? The passive-aggressive approach is not working, but if thats the way you choose to discuss things...

You obviously think I am backing Obama and the democrats. I don't recall saying that at all. What I was doing is refuting your "this used to be the United States of America" laments.

If you want to discuss the actual topic I am more than willing. But if not, you have a nice day.

:rolleyes:you won..
 
Back
Top