How Will America Get it's War on Syria? Or Will War be Avoided? A Poll.

Will Obama get his Planned War against Syria?

  • The US will move the goalposts and demand more.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • The US will claim that Syria didn't give up 'all' it's chemical weapons.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • Syria will honour the agreement but the terrorists will use chem weapons and blame Assad.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • There will be no war because stated Obama interests have been satisfied.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • other (please specify)

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
You lying American piece of shit. The UN certainly is mandated to reveal the source of the chemical weapon use.


No, the group investigating the attack does not have that mandate. The Secretary General made that quite clear.

Also, emotional ad hominem outbursts don't really support your cause, particularly when you incorrectly accuse others of being liars.
 
No, the group investigating the attack does not have that mandate. The Secretary General made that quite clear.

Also, emotional ad hominem outbursts don't really support your cause, particularly when you incorrectly accuse others of being liars.

Bullshit! How can any credible person claim that the UN investigators are not to expose which side did the gassing? Call it a lack of mandate or anything you like. And you can stick your ad hominem charges where the sun doesn't shine. No American can claim enough credibility after Iraq to criticize any person from any other country in the world. That's exceptionalism for you!

Exceptionally racist pigs and haters!
 
No it isn't. That isn't within the scope of their investigation.

UN won't hurry report on sarin in Syria

The UN spokesman said, “The secretary-general made it clear that he had taken the decision to determine whether or not chemical weapons had been used and not who used them. That is in line with previous such investigations.”
http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/World_News_3/article_100759.shtml

After the Iraq experience and the fact that the US fabricated evidence, are you really serious that the UN investigating team won't attach blame. YOu stupid fucking lemming, Del Ponte has already come out and stated her suspicions! Are Americans really that stupid or is this another attempt to put down the obvious conclusions that will come out that the terrorists are responsible.

Play your cheap games with someone else in the future. Del Ponte is my proof that you are wrong in substance and only trying to be right by using some sort of dishonest illusion.
 
Lolerpops.

Yeah we know shitpile, every statement from the UN so far has not failed to mention their suspicions on what side is responsible. Continue to live your fantasies and hope like hell they don't come out and say that it was the terrorists after all that are guilty.

That could send the bulldozer in to start tearing down the UN headquarter in New York. A stroke so cruel that American would be slashing their wrists as demonstations of protest!
 
Aha, two more votes registered on my poll!

And two more gutless co--suckers who don't have the courage to be honest and declare who they are.
 
And so Darla, you phony little slut, you go dark now when you're asked to put up?

Here's the deal Darla. If you reveal how you voted on my poll I will at least say you're honourable and not a phony on that.

Hahha, I just saw this.

Here's the deal fuckwit, I don't give a crap what you say about me. Like I am going to kiss up to you so that you'll "at least say" that I'm honorable! You sound like a typical psychopath and/or meth head. Who cares what you say? Like the next time I need a mortgage I am going to go into my bank and say, hey, anonymous internet poster "Monty1" can vouch for my honor!

"Are you sure it's anonymous internet poster "Monty1" and not anonymous internet poster "Monty6? because boy did that 6 fucker sell us a bill of goods, vouching for someone's honor - we lost our shirts! we are looking for him!"

"No, no, definitely anonymous internet poster Monty1!"

"Oh, okay then. Approved!"

Get fucked psycho boy.
 
After the Iraq experience and the fact that the US fabricated evidence, are you really serious that the UN investigating team won't attach blame. YOu stupid fucking lemming, Del Ponte has already come out and stated her suspicions! Are Americans really that stupid or is this another attempt to put down the obvious conclusions that will come out that the terrorists are responsible.

Play your cheap games with someone else in the future. Del Ponte is my proof that you are wrong in substance and only trying to be right by using some sort of dishonest illusion.

You stupid assclown, PRODUCE THE EVIDENCE THAT WE ARE LIARS.

POST SOMEONE FROM THE UN DECLARING THAT THEIR INVESTIGATION WILL ASSIGN CULPABILITY


You run around here whining about how trashy this board is, when truth is, you're the fucking trash .. and really fucking dumb.

Goddamn, even when you post evidence and who in authority said it, stupid motherfuckers still won't get it.
 
I have not weighed in much on this topic.

It is really quite a conundrum. Part of me wants to sit back and let them tear each other to shreds. Quite frankly? I am sick of them.

On the other hand, I don't care to see innocents killed by chemical weapons either.

I suggest we invest Money....scads of money into renewables. We know it works...it's just a matter of scale.

Figure out how to make the Tesla and the volt affordable and practical. Encourage other car manufacturers to do the same.

If everyone could afford one, why wouldn't they make the switch the next time they need a car?

Same goes with our homes....solar, geothermal.
 
Hahha, I just saw this.

Here's the deal fuckwit, I don't give a crap what you say about me. Like I am going to kiss up to you so that you'll "at least say" that I'm honorable! You sound like a typical psychopath and/or meth head. Who cares what you say? Like the next time I need a mortgage I am going to go into my bank and say, hey, anonymous internet poster "Monty1" can vouch for my honor!

"Are you sure it's anonymous internet poster "Monty1" and not anonymous internet poster "Monty6? because boy did that 6 fucker sell us a bill of goods, vouching for someone's honor - we lost our shirts! we are looking for him!"

"No, no, definitely anonymous internet poster Monty1!"

"Oh, okay then. Approved!"

Get fucked psycho boy.

I don't like repeating myself so I blogged this post on my JPP blog. It's entitled "JPP Psychopaths and/or Meth Heads" to make it easier for you dumb fucks to find.

Please refer to it the next time any of you psychopaths and meth heads, and you know who you are, get the idea I might give a flying white dude what you will "at least" say about me.

Thank you.
 
Pretending Assad did not do this is silly.


every entity that has looked at the evidence says all the evidence points straight at the Syrian Military.


when did this country begin ignoring this type of crime?

under Reagan.


when will we break the Reagan curse on this one?

when will we do the right thing?
 
You don't stand on the street corner and watch a man hit women and children with a bat and do nothing and saying " Im tired and those people don't matter because last week I saw my own neighbor kill his mother with a bat and did nothing".

Listen to yourselves and admit being weary of war is not a good reason to watch crimes happen that we did not have the morals to stop in the past.
 
European Union and NATO officials firmly believe al-Assad was responsible for the Aug. 21 Sarin nerve gas attack in Damascus’ suburbs. Even when the U.N. report comes in, it won’t assign responsibility, only confirm the presence of poison gas. EU foreign ministers meeting in Vilnius, Lithuania, asked Kerry to wait for the U.N. report.
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-shrewd-political-gambit-syria

If it doesn't assign responsibility then there are two possible reasons for not doing so.

1. They were incapable of determining which side was responsible.
2. The terrorists were responsible and the US applied pressure to keep it quiet.

I would suspect that as always with these gassing incidents there will be some hunches thrown around and then the US media will take those words and attempt to make it a positive thing.

We can be very thankful that there are honest Russian members of the inspection teams and so the US won't get away with fabricating a false report.

This issue, with the demonization of Putin, the US foot dragging, the US negativism toward finding a peaceful resolution, has now made it very obvious that the humanitarian concerns are not what motivates the US to war.

Msnbc has become so obvious on that fact that it's become sickening to even watch them anymore. And I'm a leftist and an Obama backer and am objective about this issue as anyone can be.
 
If it doesn't assign responsibility then there are two possible reasons for not doing so.

1. They were incapable of determining which side was responsible.
2. The terrorists were responsible and the US applied pressure to keep it quiet.


LOL. It couldn't possibly be the actual reason - that the investigators were specifically not tasked with determining who used thm.
 
You don't stand on the street corner and watch a man hit women and children with a bat and do nothing and saying " Im tired and those people don't matter because last week I saw my own neighbor kill his mother with a bat and did nothing".

Listen to yourselves and admit being weary of war is not a good reason to watch crimes happen that we did not have the morals to stop in the past.

Nice analogy! So let me use it for you. If that analogy equals the US going into foreign countries and slaughtering millions under their bombs then yes, you do watch people dying and barely say anything against it. You can't change facts dear.

This is not about US morals, it has few, this is about going to war for reasons other than humanitarian. Wesley Clarke supplied the evidence and all the evidence from past US practice makes the anti-war side's case solid. Not to mention all the US negativism over the very possibility of Putin's initiative succeeding.
 
LOL. It couldn't possibly be the actual reason - that the investigators were specifically not tasked with determining who used thm.

Not tasked or lacking a mandate, it makes little difference when the facts have shown that Del Ponte and the rest of the UN have come out repeatedly with suggestions on which side was responsible.

Has it now gotten to the point at which we will hear the US try to forbid the UN from coming to the right conclusion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top