How Will America Get it's War on Syria? Or Will War be Avoided? A Poll.

Will Obama get his Planned War against Syria?

  • The US will move the goalposts and demand more.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • The US will claim that Syria didn't give up 'all' it's chemical weapons.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • Syria will honour the agreement but the terrorists will use chem weapons and blame Assad.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • There will be no war because stated Obama interests have been satisfied.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • other (please specify)

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
dear fucking idiot partisan hack,


he went after the weapons and now they are going to be gone.
what the fuck is this claimed walk back you lying sack of rat shit?

Dear fucking asshat; what weapons have been removed from Syria?

Only someone dumber than a rat can make such laughably asshattish claims and then call others idiot partisan hacks.

There are no mirrors in your house are there asshat; if there were, the reflection back at you would be the perfect definition for hyper partisan asshat.
 
No doubt about it, if Obama succeeds then he becomes the hero for the American people. It won't matter how the rabid right tries to counterspin it.

But if the initiative fails and there is war then Obama losed bigtime regardless of what trumped up phony reason is made by the rabid right to get a war.

Sadly, there's little doubt that some excuse will be found for war. The US has reasons much bigger than chemical weapons for a war that will cut out the Russians in their sphere of influence. Through Wesley Clarke they were stupid enough to tell us a long time ago. Syria's toast, just like Iraq and for no more honourable reason.

This poll shows it and none have the courage to state publicly that there won't be a war. Not even evince.

What would Obama succeed in? Do any of you incredibly stupid leftsists read the papers?

Clashes rage on in Syria despite chemical arms deal

Opposition leaders and human rights advocates try to shift the focus back to the ongoing bloodshed caused by bullets, artillery shells, bombs and rockets.


http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-syria-war-20130916,0,4099737.story

I forgot; hyper partisan asshat liberals can't read.
 
GOING


learn to read shitgob

Dear asshat; here is Obama drawing the red line:


Dear asshat; here is Obama walking his rhetoric back.


Dear asshat; do the world a favor and shove your empty hyper partisan head were the sun doesn't shine and jump.
 
What would Obama succeed in? Do any of you incredibly stupid leftsists read the papers?

Clashes rage on in Syria despite chemical arms deal

Opposition leaders and human rights advocates try to shift the focus back to the ongoing bloodshed caused by bullets, artillery shells, bombs and rockets.


http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-syria-war-20130916,0,4099737.story

I forgot; hyper partisan asshat liberals can't read.



He was after the chem weapons not after ending the civil war you lying asshole
 
He was after the chem weapons not after ending the civil war you lying asshole

Dear asshat; he hasn't gotten anything yet.

But again, when you are dumber than a rock, you are inclined to say incredibly stupid things, fabricate incredibly stupid things and support incredibly stupid candidates.
 
so you don't like diplomacy?


make up your fucking mind

Dear asshat; where did I claim I don't like diplomacy? Oh that's right, you make up your own world so that you can wallow in ignorance and remove all doubt what an incredibly dumb vulgar asshat you are.
 
[
:0) This from the asswipe who thinks invading Iraq was a good idea.

This from the asshat who thinks we should bomb Syria.

You never got around to answering if I voted for Obama or not. :0) YOU are a moron.

I asked you the question dumbass; how the hell would I know who you voted for if you are too big of an asshat to be honest about it? No one can be this stupid; but you’re determined to prove that you can take stupid to new extremes.

Carry on asshat; keep posting. We need to find out how stupid dipshits like you really can be.
 
This from the asshat who thinks we should bomb Syria.

:rofl2: You have no clue how big of an ass you're making of yourself .. but please continue.

Where were we .. oh yeah, I want Syria bombed. :0)

I asked you the question dumbass; how the hell would I know who you voted for if you are too big of an asshat to be honest about it? No one can be this stupid; but you’re determined to prove that you can take stupid to new extremes.

Well, dummy .. if only you could READ. If you had the ability to read, you would know that I never voted for Obama, don't support him, not a democrat, and that I've stood against all for-profit wars .. including this one and the one you were too dumb to figure out.

Everyone here on this board knows that .. but you. :0)

YOU are stupid.
 
:rofl2: You have no clue how big of an ass you're making of yourself .. but please continue.

Where were we .. oh yeah, I want Syria bombed. :0)



Well, dummy .. if only you could READ. If you had the ability to read, you would know that I never voted for Obama, don't support him, not a democrat, and that I've stood against all for-profit wars .. including this one and the one you were too dumb to figure out.

Everyone here on this board knows that .. but you. :0)

YOU are stupid.

Well, when you rant like a vulgar asshole Liberal; it is very hard to tell what your political affiliations are.

So what are you? Libertarian? Or just a vulgar dumbass with no political affiliation?
 
Well, when you rant like a vulgar asshole Liberal; it is very hard to tell what your political affiliations are.

So what are you? Libertarian? Or just a vulgar dumbass with no political affiliation?

Kiss my ass dummy.

Next time pay attention before you open that toilet bowl brain of yours and shit falls out.

.. and growing up wouldn't hurt you either.
 
Kiss my ass dummy.

In other words, you’re not only a liar and a dumbass, but a political coward as well; got it.

Which ass, the one on your shoulders or in your panties girly man?

Next time pay attention before you open that toilet bowl brain of yours and shit falls out
.. and growing up wouldn't hurt you either.

This coming from a vulgar dumbass who lies; the epitome of irony:

:0) You are truly stupid.
I mean REALLY stupid.[/B]

:0) This from the asswipe who thinks invading Iraq was a good idea.
You never got around to answering if I voted for Obama or not. :0) YOU are a moron.

Kiss my ass dummy.

You’re a dumbass caricature of that which you denounce.

Dismissed dipshit.
 
If we try to rise above Americans just being Americans, everyone should at least understand that this has the potential to go very good for Obama if war is avoided and very bad for him if it isn't.

I sure wouldn't bet on Obama being able to prevent war right now but there's no harm in being truthful about it. And of course, all along I've given Obama the benefit of the doubt and will continue to do so.

For evince: Yes, it has the potential to be huge for Obama but it's not there yet. I truly hope it works because it's history making and it won't go unnoticed that an American president had a large part in letting it happen. In my opinion there are few presidents that would let it happen. And if it does then there's nothing the political right is going to be able to do about it to take away from it as Obama's achievement. You can bet the world is watching!
 
Hey dumbass; please provide the polls that showed the American public was not in support of the Iraq War before we went in.

From: "mike burke"
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:56 PM
Subject: Democracy Now Exclusive: Survey Shows
Congress Overwhelmed w/ Anti-War Calls


*** DEMOCRACY NOW EXCLUSIVE ***

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 27, 2002


CONGRESS OVERWHELMED WITH ANTI-WAR CALLS FROM"THE SILENCED MAJORITY"

Republican and Democratic Senate offices report "overwhelming" opposition from their constituents
to war with Iraq. This comes as Congress prepares to pass a war resolution granting President Bush sweeping powers to invade Iraq.

The national news radio show Democracy Now! conducted an informal survey on Thursday of 70 Republican and Democratic Senate offices.

Of the 26 offices which responded to our inquires, 22 reported an overwhelming majority - in some cases up to 99 percent -- of constituents opposed war inIraq; three said the response was split and just one office Among the findings:

Democrats * Wisconsin Sen. Herb Kohl: Aides say they are receiving 1,000-2,000 calls per week with the overwhelming number opposed to an attack on Iraq.

* Washington Sen. Patty Murray: Over 5,000 letters and phone calls were received last week on Iraq,
Aides say. Only about 100 came from constituents who supported an attack.

* California Sen. Dianne Feinstein: Staff in her San Francisco office reported about 200 calls a day
with 99 percent of the callers opposing the war.

* New Mexico Sen. Jeff Bingaman: The D.C. office has been receiving at least 1,300 calls a day with
about 70 percent opposed to war.

Republicans * North Carolina Jesse Helms: Staff declined to give figures but said the "majority is against" when it comes to calls on Iraq.

* Nebraska Charles Hegal: According to aides, constituents favor diplomacy over war at a rate
of 5 to 1.

* Virginia John Warner: About 150 constituents a day are calling into the D.C. offices. "A very small
minority supported military action," said one aide.

"It's extraordinary that, as Senators work with the Bush Administration to draft a war resolution,
their constituents are expressing overwhelming opposition an attack against Iraq," said Amy Goodman, the host of Democracy Now! "Unfortunately we are hearing very little about this in the media. These calls represent the silenced majority, not the silent majority."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top