How Will America Get it's War on Syria? Or Will War be Avoided? A Poll.

Will Obama get his Planned War against Syria?

  • The US will move the goalposts and demand more.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • The US will claim that Syria didn't give up 'all' it's chemical weapons.

    Votes: 4 36.4%
  • Syria will honour the agreement but the terrorists will use chem weapons and blame Assad.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • There will be no war because stated Obama interests have been satisfied.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • other (please specify)

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL:

Question: But who put the limits on the mandate? Is it the Syrian Government? What is the mandate of the team, of Sellström’s team, is not identified, so who put such limitations on the mandate? Was it the Secretariat when it negotiated, was it the Syrian Government or was it the Security Council?

Secretary-General: This is the United Nations decision and my decision. The mandate of this team is to determine the use of chemical weapons — whether there was or not the use of chemical weapons. It’s not to determine who has used against whom. We do not have that kind of mandate at this time. So it’s not… one may think it is a limit, but this is based on the recognized standards of the international community. We’ve been working very closely with the OPCW [Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons] and the WHO [World Health Organization].

Thank you very much. I have to rush to the airport at this time. I hope you will understand. Thank you.


http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2013/sgsm15261.doc.htm
 

Yes, I know all that so now try to rise above it while we try to discuss this in a sane manner. Has the UN been forbidden in the past from voicing it's opinions on where blame should be placed. Will the UN stop short of voicing it's position on where blame should be placed in the coming report?

Will the US forbid the UN from placing a suspicion of where the blame lies?
Have no doubt, that if that should happen then the US case for war will evaporate into nothing in the eyes of the world.

The UN will voice it's suspicions and those suspicions, if on the side of Assad's regime will be manufactured into positives by the US propagandists.

But before that, remind me what side you're taking on this rush to war.
 
Who is it that chose the last option that states Obama's demands have been fulfilled and there will be no war. Why would a person who thinks that way not have the courage to say it?
 
And so Desh (evince) do you now have the courage to put your name to your choice? If you believe in what you have said then you must have. And I'm supposing that you are the only one who thinks there will be no war.
 
Aha, two more votes registered on my poll!

And two more gutless co--suckers who don't have the courage to be honest and declare who they are.

Are you too retarded to make a poll public? Holy shit, even Jarod knows how to do that....
 
Are you too retarded to make a poll public? Holy shit, even Jarod knows how to do that....

I've already explained why I didn't do that. People would be discouraged from taking part because they want to remain anonymous, as we have seen already with this one. Do the same poll for me if you like and make it public. I'll certainly register my choice.
 
It won't work.

Why could Bush ignore the will of majority to start war on Iraq?
Why could Bush had a second term when he was a proved lier? (WMD)
Why Obama insists to missile Syria despite opposition from majority?

You still don't know your country is a totalitarian? It says it is democratic. It is not. President and Congress work for the same master - inside group. They never work for the people.

When Bush started Iraq war which was against the will of people, nothing happened. Even when he was proved a lier (WMD), he was still selected for second term. This is a totalitarian country. Most things are fake. Civil rights; election; Constitution..... all are of a cover value. It is a dictatorship. Everything is under domestic control.
 
It won't work.

Why could Bush ignore the will of majority to start war on Iraq?
Why could Bush had a second term when he was a proved lier? (WMD)
Why Obama insists to missile Syria despite opposition from majority?

You still don't know your country is a totalitarian? It says it is democratic. It is not. President and Congress work for the same master - inside group. They never work for the people.

When Bush started Iraq war which was against the will of people, nothing happened. Even when he was proved a lier (WMD), he was still selected for second term. This is a totalitarian country. Most things are fake. Civil rights; election; Constitution..... all are of a cover value. It is a dictatorship. Everything is under domestic control.

Intelligent and thoughtful Americans probably know all this. But they also know that their country can't be stopped in conventional ways because it is too powerful militarily.

That leaves stopping it in other ways such as economic pressures or non-military strikes of the nature of the attack on the WTC. However, Americans are still mostly of the opinion that they are invincible and immune from attack.

Well, maybe they are but also as likely is that they aren't.

This has a lot to do with the careless attitude and the careless rhetoric being expressed on forums such as this. Americans are likely to make a decision on going to war if at least it's suggested (not promised) that none of theirs will die in the war.

So callous!
 
I've already explained why I didn't do that. People would be discouraged from taking part because they want to remain anonymous, as we have seen already with this one. Do the same poll for me if you like and make it public. I'll certainly register my choice.

So you want people to be anonymous but then want them to post what choice they made?

Ok....
 
So you want people to be anonymous but then want them to post what choice they made?

Ok....

I wanted to give them the choice to be anonymous and thereby register their vote in case they didn't want to go public. But I certainly didn't expect that they wouldn't have the courage to be forthwith and honest about it. It's a little ridiculous to expect that they would have registered their vote now isn't it.

However, as I've said, you can do the same poll over again and make it public.
 
There is nothing I hate more than war. It turns men into monsters .. and women and children into statistics.

Why is America so in love with war?

Answer: for the money

What a profoundly stupid claim. It's the taking point of fools and buffoons who have their realities filtered for them.
 
It won't work.

Why could Bush ignore the will of majority to start war on Iraq?
Why could Bush had a second term when he was a proved lier? (WMD)
Why Obama insists to missile Syria despite opposition from majority?
I
You still don't know your country is a totalitarian? It says it is democratic. It is not. President and Congress work for the same master - inside group. They never work for the people.

When Bush started Iraq war which was against the will of people, nothing happened. Even when he was proved a lier (WMD), he was still selected for second term. This is a totalitarian country. Most things are fake. Civil rights; election; Constitution..... all are of a cover value. It is a dictatorship. Everything is under domestic control.

Hey dumbass; please provide the polls that showed the American public was not in support of the Iraq War before we went in.
 
I didn't vote in he stupid poll because there wasn't a choice for Obama doing nothing because he is all bluster and talk with very little walk.
 
I believe the goal posts have already been moved. The president has walked back his threats due to the international pressure, but notably since the UK's parliamentary vote against involvement. Took the wind right out of his sails.
 
I didn't vote in he stupid poll because there wasn't a choice for Obama doing nothing because he is all bluster and talk with very little walk.

There was a choice of 'other'. How could I have guessed that somebody would want a choice of Obama doing nothing. I think you're just a coward and didn't want to take a chance of being wrong. You still are.
 
There was a choice of 'other'. How could I have guessed that somebody would want a choice of Obama doing nothing. I think you're just a coward and didn't want to take a chance of being wrong. You still are.

Yeah that's it moron; carry on clueless.
 
I believe the goal posts have already been moved. The president has walked back his threats due to the international pressure, but notably since the UK's parliamentary vote against involvement. Took the wind right out of his sails.


dear fucking idiot partisan hack,


he went after the weapons and now they are going to be gone.

what the fuck is this claimed walk back you lying sack of rat shit?
 
No doubt about it, if Obama succeeds then he becomes the hero for the American people. It won't matter how the rabid right tries to counterspin it.

But if the initiative fails and there is war then Obama losed bigtime regardless of what trumped up phony reason is made by the rabid right to get a war.

Sadly, there's little doubt that some excuse will be found for war. The US has reasons much bigger than chemical weapons for a war that will cut out the Russians in their sphere of influence. Through Wesley Clarke they were stupid enough to tell us a long time ago. Syria's toast, just like Iraq and for no more honourable reason.

This poll shows it and none have the courage to state publicly that there won't be a war. Not even evince.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top