T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
I thought you said he's senile?
Even the senile have their lucid moments...
I thought you said he's senile?
Even the senile have their lucid moments...
True.
You yourself said this: "The depth of that involvement is not fully known".
In other words, you do not know. Hence no evidence.
That means he was involved, contrary to his LYING about not being involved. It is to what extent he was involved we don't fully know. Just his being involved raises serious questions.
How do you know he was involved in it?
You have to understand how the left plays the game . You could have multiple Videos from 5 different angles of Joe Biden screwing a billygoat and board lefties would only say........NOPE.....no evidence.![]()
Cope
Nice trolling.![]()
Its TRUTH not trolling.
I caught this on Twitter recently:
" I have no problem with Hunter Biden explaining his $50,000.00/month Board position he had in the Ukraine under oath IF Jared Kushner and Ivanka go under oath and detail the sources of $90 million in foreign funding from unexplained, offshore sources Kushner's business received after Trump took office. ENOUGH WITH THE BULLSHIT!"
Sounds fair enough to me. Thoughts?
How do you know he was involved in it?
The photos show he lied about never meeting his son's business partners. That's a start. What else has he lied about on this subject, given the asshole lies about everything else.
The photos show he lied about never meeting his son's business partners. That's a start. What else has he lied about on this subject, given the asshole lies about everything else.
Since there is a photo of Obama and Fartkhan together, it must mean Obama was involved in the Jew hating business.![]()
False equivalence. Obama didn't go out and repeatedly say he never met Farrakhan while claiming to know nothing about Jews. Biden went out repeatedly and stated he had NO (zero) knowledge of his son's business dealings.
The photos show he met with his son's business partners on multiple occasions. There is ZERO way he stood in his office at the White House taking photos with people his son brought in and he didn't know who they were or what they were doing with his son.
So since you think he "lied" about meeting his son's business partners, that means he was involved?
So since you think he "lied" about meeting his son's business partners, that means he was involved?