What's good for the goose ...

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Okay, but why are you trying to detour aways from the nepotism regarding the Kushners? Remember, the Kushners had cabinet/advisory positions while Dump was President. Slick and Hill were not in any office at the time frame you reference. I have no problem with investigations so long as they are relevant, pertinent and actually lead to something productive.

The OP simply puts it all in perspective.....you investigate one, you investigate all.

That's what mindless partisans do. You make a point about one side and they reply with a completely unrelated point about the other side. In Stone's case, he's stuck in the 1990s because that's when he stopped emotionally maturing.

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW. That's what I'm advocating, and I don't give a damn if it negatively affects the Bidens or Democrats. That's what the OP is about ... anything else is pure BS.

 

[Taichiliberal]

because your part of the world experiences absurd fantasies......

Jeez, you can't even muster a retort beyond grade school level!

For the honest, objective reader...here's what PMP left out of my previous response: " I rightly criticized Dump & company for their actions. I also criticized the DNC when needed. Too bad if you don't like it, but you sure as hell can't logically fault the criticism no matter how frequently you and your compadres tell each other the SOS.

The OP stands a valid point"

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
IF?

Once again, a MAGA troll tactic that pushes speculation, supposition and conjecture as fact.

The OP is a fair proposal....and exposes the BS you are so eager to defend.

no isn't.

no it doesn't.

its dumb as balls.

Your childish retorts indicate you have nothing left but troll tactics. You're done.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Wrong as usual. For your education:


The White House is only telling you half of the sad story of what happened to American jobs

https://www.businessinsider.com/what...the-80s-2017-7

it's basically right.



your nitpicking on details makes you look stupid and unable to conquer the larger point:

globalization fanaticism is disastrous on many fronts.

1. it's a one way money suck out of so called "post-industrial" countries, for many reasons.

2. It's a national security idiocy stroke, as it makes a nation dependant on hostile foreign enemies. is it wise to give up your national supply chain with no thought of security concerns? our security state is evidently a treason state now. so go fuck yourselves and go suck more klaus schwab dick.

I'm not "nitpicking" anything. The link clearly documents a timeline that you stated is WRONG.

But instead of just honestly conceding a point, you just pile on your worthless supposition and conjecture as fact. It isn't. But being a MAGA asshat, you'll just repeat and tout your rhetoric ad nausea.

You're done.

 

[Monad Portal]

I'm not "nitpicking" anything. The link clearly documents a timeline that you stated is WRONG.

But instead of just honestly conceding a point, you just pile on your worthless supposition and conjecture as fact. It isn't. But being a MAGA asshat, you'll just repeat and tout your rhetoric ad nausea.

You're done.

You're nitpicking on dumb bullshit.

You cannot face the larger tragedy that you feel you must continue to be a globalist idiot traitor to humanity and god.

your only dumb nitpick is that it started sooner. yeah maybe so. and?

deal with the issues you dumb idiot fuck.

 

[Diesel]

not since lib'ruls started pretending retribution meant revenge.....

That's literally what it means. The fact that you attempt to even corrupt simple English vocabulary with your political hatred is just further evidence that you are a truly lost and stupid person who will deny reality and erase your credibility just to own the libs. You are a pathetic shell of a human and a robot of the alt right.

noun
punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.

 

[Diesel]

EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW. That's what I'm advocating, and I don't give a damn if it negatively affects the Bidens or Democrats. That's what the OP is about ... anything else is pure BS.

Yeah, that's what I said.

 

[Jarod]

I bet Kushner would give a better explanation than Bagman, assuming Bagman shows up straight not stoned...

Maybe, but we will never know because Kushner will fight like hell to avoid being under oath.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

That's literally what it means. The fact that you attempt to even corrupt simple English vocabulary with your political hatred is just further evidence that you are a truly lost and stupid person who will deny reality and erase your credibility just to own the libs. You are a pathetic shell of a human and a robot of the alt right.

noun
punishment inflicted on someone as vengeance for a wrong or criminal act.

that is not what it originally meant......

Etymology
Middle English retribucioun, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin retribution-, retributio, from Latin retribuere to pay back, from re- + tribuere to pay

to restore what was taken.......
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retribution

First recorded in 1350–1400; Middle English retribucioun, from Middle French, from Late Latin retribūtiōn- (stem of retribūtiō ) “punishment, reward as result of judgment,” equivalent to Latin retribūt(us) (past participle of retribuere “to restore, give back”; see re-, tribute) + -iōn--ion

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/retribution