Weiner: Yeah, it was my wiener!

[zappasguitar]

Again:

Just going to hold your breath until everyone starts being nice to you...is that the plan?

AWWWWWWWW...is peepeepants mad at me?

That is MAGNIFICENT by the way...I couldn't highlight the total stupidity of your average response and lack of factual information provided in your petulant little tantrums any better than you yourself are doing right now and I thank you!

One morning jock on an AM talk station in Nevada does NOT a mainstream GOP party member make. But by all means continue to backpedal from that earlier claim you made.

 

[DamnYankee]

LOL At FatAssGut. You're so anxious to get a "gotcha" that you have to define someone else's position to try and get it.

But as with nearly everything else in your life, failure, followed by self-denial.

 

[zappasguitar]

LOL At FatAssGut. You're so anxious to get a "gotcha" that you have to define someone else's position to try and get it.

But as with nearly everything else in your life, failure, followed by self-denial.

And you're so deathly afraid to admit to a Liberal that they were right and you were wrong that all you can do is backpedal, change your story and move the goalposts.

It speaks volumes that you choose Clint Eastwood as your avatar...Clint is a "real" man, whereas you're just a weak-kneed, spineless little man who cowers behind a photo of someone with much more courage and honor.

Now run and get those two dried up old twats out here to deflect attention away from your lying ass...



:lol:

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

And you're so deathly afraid to admit to a Liberal that they were right and you were wrong that all you can do is backpedal, change your story and move the goalposts.

It speaks volumes that you choose Clint Eastwood as your avatar...Clint is a "real" man, whereas you're just a weak-kneed, spineless little man who cowers behind a photo of someone with much more courage and honor.

Now run and get those two dried up old twats out here to deflect attention away from your lying ass...



:lol:

Speaking of "deflecting attention" why is it you are not calling out your fellow liberal, Bfoon, who is passionately defending Weiner and not calling for his resignation as you have? I'd like to see you take him to task, Zapped... I think you can take him, he's not that much of a challenge... and I can tell by your avatar of Frank Zappa, that you ain't afraid!

:lmao:

 

[DamnYankee]

Epic fail by Zap, again.

 

[tinfoil]

I just saw that he sent picks of his dick. LOL

Every single person would define someone sending pics of their junk as a perv.

I love it that there are still defenders of this little chump.

LOL the twitter brought him down.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I just saw that he sent picks of his dick. LOL

Every single person would define someone sending pics of their junk as a perv.

I love it that there are still defenders of this little chump.

LOL the twitter brought him down.

Busted for tweeting his weenie!! I love it!

Seriously, I hope they don't force him to resign! PLEAAAASE... Let Weiner Stay! I want him to be the Poster Boy for the Democrat Party in 2012, and if they get rid of him now, he will be all but a footnote in history by election time. I urge all you pinhead liberals to call and write Nancy Pelosi and tell her to lay off the Weiner! I mean.... how can we usurp the will of his constituents over his personal sex life...doesn't 'democracy' mean anything anymore? This is the man the people of NY elected to represent them, and by God, I think he ought to have to serve every stinking day of his term!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
What's your point? How does this change or disprove what I've stated previously?

It's called a 'question'.

I ask, you answer.

Or not.

Okay, I'll give you the long version. I'm not impressed that your source gives out negative poll results for the GOP...hell, I wasn't aware they existed until you provided the link.....using a limited number of people and then claiming its an adequate representation of the entire country just doesn't cut it. Now, if you go to a website that gives you the poll results on a subject from a number of various pollsters, you can extrapolate a decent conclusion.

My original reply to you here stands....and since you obviously disagree, I'd say we're pretty much done on this .

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by apple0154
What kind of person would deny the 911 responders, those who were stricken by illness while in the line of duty, medical care? Perhaps the question should be who would vote for the people denying care?

Who should resign: a man sending pictures of himself in his underwear or a man voting to deny medical care to the suffering and dying responders?

It's a strange world, indeed!

Funny, that is the same bullshit spin some on the left used with Clinton. Clinton was impeached because he LIED under oath... not because he got a blow job. Weiner is getting nailed because he LIED... not because he texted pictures of himself (unless it turns out some recipients were under age).

No bullshit or spin...Slick Willy gets an article of impeachment for lying under oath....the willfully ignornant neocon toadies and parrots want to leave it at that. The average schmoe with a high school diploma and a job would ask, "what did he lie about?". Answer....an extra-marital affair...which had NOTHING to do with the initial investigation into an alleged insider trading violation.....which came to public attention not by his wife filing for divorce, but via an illegal wiretap that's inadmissable in court. Results: no Wall St. trading violation uncovered, but a Millions of tax payers dollars wasted.

No bullshit or spin......a right wing attack dog ponies up evidence that Weiner been web flirting with a bunch of women via nude/lewd/suggestive pics, tweets and e-mails. Weiner lies badly about it, and has to publically cop to the lying. Big deal for his new bride wife who is now pregnant.....Publically embarassing, critical damage for a re-election, possible ethics violation in using gov't property, but has NOTHING to do with his record of revealing neocon BS on the Congressional floor.

Anyone party screaming moral outrage from either side of the political fence are living in glass houses and should STFU.

 

[Canceled1]

Epic fail by Zap, again.

I think Zappa has clear Weiner-Envy. When you have to tie a string around it and attach it to your wrist in order to take a whiz, life just ain't that great, ya know?

 

[zappasguitar]

I think Zappa has clear Weiner-Envy. When you have to tie a string around it and attach it to your wrist in order to take a whiz, life just ain't that great, ya know?

Coming from someone who has to tie a 2x4 across her boyfriend's ass so he doesn't fall in during sex, it's not really surprising she's jealous of the loving relationship between myself and my wife.

Rumor is, sex with disloyal these days is like rolling a BB down the middle of a four lane highway...just sayin.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

No bullshit or spin...Slick Willy gets an article of impeachment for lying under oath....the willfully ignornant neocon toadies and parrots want to leave it at that. The average schmoe with a high school diploma and a job would ask, "what did he lie about?". Answer....an extra-marital affair...which had NOTHING to do with the initial investigation into an alleged insider trading violation.....

WAAAAANK! Sorry, and I had such high hopes for you, it started out so well... Yes, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, I have to give you kudos for admitting that, after hearing pinheads yammer for 13 years, that he was not impeached, or that he was impeached for having sex with his intern, it is refreshing to know that history finally sunk in, and you now realize he was impeached for lying under oath. Now, you are also correct that he lied about an extra-marital affair, but it wasn't in any trial pertaining to insider trading, it was in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones. There is a significant difference. Being the charge was "sexual harassment" the fact that Clinton was having an extra-marital affair, was material to the prosecution's case. Even a dim bulb such as yourself, should understand that. If a Republican had lied under oath and jeopardized a case like that, he would still be pissing on the bars trying to rust his way out of jail for it.

No bullshit or spin......a right wing attack dog ponies up evidence that Weiner been web flirting with a bunch of women via nude/lewd/suggestive pics, tweets and e-mails. Weiner lies badly about it, and has to publically cop to the lying. Big deal for his new bride wife who is now pregnant.....Publically embarassing, critical damage for a re-election, possible ethics violation in using gov't property, but has NOTHING to do with his record of revealing neocon BS on the Congressional floor.

You're right, it has nothing to do with his record in Congress. Thanks for admitting that... some pinheads were claiming earlier that this was a right wing dirty trick, some even suggested Andrew Breitbart hacked Weiner's computer... when the 'hacking' excuse was still in play.

Anyone party screaming moral outrage from either side of the political fence are living in glass houses and should STFU.

You're absolutely correct, I hope that Republicans will just let this go... allow Weiner to remain right where he is until election time! I can think of nothing better for the Democrats than to have to tolerate the ridicule and jokes, and have this ineffective clown taking up space on the Democrat side of the aisle. I think the people who elected Weiner should get to decide if his ethics and morals matter to them, and if they don't... hell, re-elect the pervert! Then we can make him the Poster Boy for the Democrats... sounds wonderful to me! What can I possibly do to help ensure he isn't forced to resign???

 

[wanderingbear]

What has this guy done wrong?

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

What has this guy done wrong?

Wye, nothing at all wanderingbear... he was just sending sultry sex messages and pictures to young college-aged women, and some middle-aged women (porn star), and he accidentally sent one to his public twitter account, so everyone saw his package... then he told everyone it was a prank, he was hacked... he continued to insist he didn't send the picture, and sycophants speculated wildly, that right-winger Andrew Breitbart, was the one who hacked him. After two weeks, when it became apparent that it wasn't going away without further investigation and clarification into what had actually happened, he admitted the previous two weeks were all a lie, that he sent the pictures himself. So, there is really nothing at all to kick him out of Congress for, and I hope that Nancy Pelosi doesn't try it. I want Anthony Weiner to stay right where he is, and I want more people like you to come forward and tell us about how he didn't do anything that you object to... did I mention his wife will be delivering Jr. Weiner in a few months? Won't that be fun? I can hardly wait!

 

[Damocles]

I look at it this way:

Would I get fired for this? The answer is likely, no. If my employer found out I was having legal sexting conversations with adult women, they'd check to see if I did it using work systems, if I hadn't. I'd be fine. However, if I had I'd be sacked. For sure and without fanfare. Did Weiner use his official computer for this? I don't know. If he used government resources, offered his staff to aid in lying or something. If that is true. Then maybe he should be sacked. Otherwise, it is up to NY's 9th Congressional District to decide if this lack of judgment is worth his losing his job.

You won't hear me calling for the dude's resignation. Just let his district decide what to do with him.

I suspect that in a decade when we move into 2020, he'll be listed in the "remember when" videos and soundtracks that people will throw out there... He'll be a joke for a long time to come.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

No bullshit or spin...Slick Willy gets an article of impeachment for lying under oath....the willfully ignornant neocon toadies and parrots want to leave it at that. The average schmoe with a high school diploma and a job would ask, "what did he lie about?". Answer....an extra-marital affair...which had NOTHING to do with the initial investigation into an alleged insider trading violation.....which came to public attention not by his wife filing for divorce, but via an illegal wiretap that's inadmissable in court. Results: no Wall St. trading violation uncovered, but a Millions of tax payers dollars wasted.

No bullshit or spin......a right wing attack dog ponies up evidence that Weiner been web flirting with a bunch of women via nude/lewd/suggestive pics, tweets and e-mails. Weiner lies badly about it, and has to publically cop to the lying. Big deal for his new bride wife who is now pregnant.....Publically embarassing, critical damage for a re-election, possible ethics violation in using gov't property, but has NOTHING to do with his record of revealing neocon BS on the Congressional floor.

Anyone party screaming moral outrage from either side of the political fence are living in glass houses and should STFU.

Wow.... all that rambling and it doesn't change ONE thing about what I wrote. REGARDLESS of how Clinton came to that point in time.... HE LIED UNDER OATH and was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH.... not for getting a blow job. People are hammering Weiner, not because he was tweeting pics, but because he LIED to the public, he broke trust with the PUBLIC. Had he come out and stated the truth from the start then this would have quickly become a non-issue for all but the right wing fringe.

The POINT I made remains.... it is bullshit to state Clinton was impeached for a blow job or that Weiner is getting waxed because of a tweet.

As I and others have stated, I KNOW both sides lie to us.... the point is we SHOULD ALL be outraged when it is proven to us and we should all hold EACH AND EVERY ONE of them accountable when they do so.... REGARDLESS of what letter is in parenthesis after their name.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I look at it this way:

Would I get fired for this? The answer is likely, no. If my employer found out I was having legal sexting conversations with adult women, they'd check to see if I did it using work systems, if I hadn't. I'd be fine. However, if I had I'd be sacked. For sure and without fanfare. Did Weiner use his official computer for this? I don't know. If he used government resources, offered his staff to aid in lying or something. If that is true. Then maybe he should be sacked. Otherwise, it is up to NY's 9th Congressional District to decide if this lack of judgment is worth his losing his job.

You won't hear me calling for the dude's resignation. Just let his district decide what to do with him.

I suspect that in a decade when we move into 2020, he'll be listed in the "remember when" videos and soundtracks that people will throw out there... He'll be a joke for a long time to come.

You know, I keep hearing this 'qualifier' ...if he used government resources... Uhm, who do you think pays for his internet services? Where does he get the money to pay the electric bill or buy his personal computer? Was the camera on his Blackberry? Who pays for that? It seems to me, ALL his resources are taxpayer dollars, whether directly or indirectly. Now if we get into this and find he tried to pay off some of these women to keep them from coming forward, that might be a criminal matter, but I don't think you can avoid the fact he spent taxpayer dollars doing this, since that IS his source of income.

 

[Damocles]

You know, I keep hearing this 'qualifier' ...if he used government resources... Uhm, who do you think pays for his internet services? Where does he get the money to pay the electric bill or buy his personal computer? Was the camera on his Blackberry? Who pays for that? It seems to me, ALL his resources are taxpayer dollars, whether directly or indirectly. Now if we get into this and find he tried to pay off some of these women to keep them from coming forward, that might be a criminal matter, but I don't think you can avoid the fact he spent taxpayer dollars doing this, since that IS his source of income.

Just because he is payed for his job doesn't mean that everything he buys is payed for by "us" anymore than the gas station that (>>||<<) works at is responsible for the things (>>||<<) buys.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Just because he is payed for his job doesn't mean that everything he buys is payed for by "us" anymore than the gas station that (>>||<<) works at is responsible for the things (>>||<<) buys.

Well, I disagree. His home, his car, his computer, his internet access, his utilities... are all paid for with taxpayer dollars. We funded his little escapades, whether you want to admit that or not, Dumo.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
No bullshit or spin...Slick Willy gets an article of impeachment for lying under oath....the willfully ignornant neocon toadies and parrots want to leave it at that. The average schmoe with a high school diploma and a job would ask, "what did he lie about?". Answer....an extra-marital affair...which had NOTHING to do with the initial investigation into an alleged insider trading violation.....

WAAAAANK! Please do NOT share your wanking, Dixie! Sorry, and I had such high hopes for you, it started out so well... Yes, Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, I have to give you kudos for admitting that, after hearing pinheads yammer for 13 years, that he was not impeached, or that he was impeached for having sex with his intern, it is refreshing to know that history finally sunk in, and you now realize he was impeached for lying under oath. Obviously, your ears have been clogged with right wing talking points and the blatherings of Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, the WND, NewsMax, Fox Noise, Maulkin, Crowley, Levin, the WND, the Washington Times, etc., because for 13 years folk like me have been pointing out the details of the ARTICLE of impeachment, and the dubious legality of the reasons that were behind it. Now, you are also correct that he lied about an extra-marital affair, but it wasn't in any trial pertaining to insider trading, it was in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by Paula Jones. There is a significant difference. Being the charge was "sexual harassment" the fact that Clinton was having an extra-marital affair, was material to the prosecution's case. Even a dim bulb such as yourself, should understand that. If a Republican had lied under oath and jeopardized a case like that, he would still be pissing on the bars trying to rust his way out of jail for it.

Ignoring your last supposition and conjecture filled sentence, you've once again have NOT gotten your facts entirely straight. Paula Jones lawsuit was a separate issue from the Starr investigation of the Clintons (Lewinsky was asked to testify, but signed an affidavit stating she didn't have sex with Clinton) ....until Tripp introduced the taped conversations with Lewinsky to Starr. Here's a nice little chronology of the situation for your edification:

http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/history/johnson/clintontimeline.htm

As you can see, my previous statement stands firm in light of the facts.

No bullshit or spin......a right wing attack dog ponies up evidence that Weiner been web flirting with a bunch of women via nude/lewd/suggestive pics, tweets and e-mails. Weiner lies badly about it, and has to publically cop to the lying. Big deal for his new bride wife who is now pregnant.....Publically embarassing, critical damage for a re-election, possible ethics violation in using gov't property, but has NOTHING to do with his record of revealing neocon BS on the Congressional floor.

You're right, it has nothing to do with his record in Congress. Thanks for admitting that... some pinheads were claiming earlier that this was a right wing dirty trick, some even suggested Andrew Breitbart hacked Weiner's computer... when the 'hacking' excuse was still in play.

Of which I said earlier that another screw-up Weiner did was hand a victory to tha POS neocon hack Breitbart by lying his ass off. Score one for the documented liar Breitbart, who like the proverbial broken clock can be right at least twice in one day.

Anyone party screaming moral outrage from either side of the political fence are living in glass houses and should STFU.

You're absolutely correct, I hope that Republicans will just let this go... allow Weiner to remain right where he is until election time! I can think of nothing better for the Democrats than to have to tolerate the ridicule and jokes, and have this ineffective clown taking up space on the Democrat side of the aisle. I think the people who elected Weiner should get to decide if his ethics and morals matter to them, and if they don't... hell, re-elect the pervert! Then we can make him the Poster Boy for the Democrats... sounds wonderful to me! What can I possibly do to help ensure he isn't forced to resign???

Ahhh, but before you have an political orgasm.....do you REALLY want to compare Weiner's boondoggle to the list of Republican creeps who are either in office, running for a nomination, or running for re-election? Remember, we're not just talking philanderers (virtual and real), we're talking closet homosexuals, pedophiles and whore mongers. I seriously doubt Weiner will survive this politically, but I REALLY doubt that the hypocritical bannister rooster of the GOP are willing to put their party's morality record to a contest. Time will tell.