Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

christiefan915 said:
Shoplifting isn't a capital offense. Why didn't the aggressor just call the cops when he saw what was happening?
Click to expand...

because not everyone is a scared granny like you that needs the cops (who they usually hate) to come save them.

This guy is a maker. He took action and reshaped reality in his own image. And it was good.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
We will never know all the details, will we?

Maybe the purported thief (NO trial/NO conviction) felt threatened by the people following him and turned to defend himself...gun nuts certainly had no problem going that route when it was your hero George Zimmerman gunning down someone he felt threatened him.
Click to expand...

it has been [0] days since a liberal on JPP has defended a thief/attempted murderer/
 
Last edited:
Let's recap:

Person A stole beer from a Circle K and took off

Person B called the DULY DEPUTIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT to report the crime and then followed the suspect, Person A, on his bike to identify him to police

Person A then threatened (or possibly attacked) Person B with a log

Person B shot Person A


Yet to Zappa the man who robbed the store and threatened the good Samaritan with a log is the victim here.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I have to wonder if somewhere in zappas past, he trusted the wrong people and it has had a severe impact on the rest of his life leading him to distrust all people, trusting only government. very sad.
Click to expand...

I know it's hard for people like us to understand, but the vast majority of our population are serfs. They would be perfectly content living in a monarchy under a king and being told exactly what to do.

Zappas is a serf. It's a completely different mindset than what natural free people like ourselves have.
 
Dad of Desh said:
it has been [0] days since a liberal on JPP has defended a thief/attempted murderer/
Click to expand...

When was the murdered man convicted of theft or attempted murder?

I defended the rights of an innocent man.

But, just like he did with his hero GZ, expect Grind to tell any lie necessary to demonize those he doesn't agree with.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
When was the murdered man convicted of theft or attempted murder?

I defended the rights of an innocent man.

But, just like he did with his hero GZ, expect Grind to tell any lie necessary to demonize those he doesn't agree with.
Click to expand...

an innocent man? You mean the guy attacked my someone with a log?
 
cawacko said:
Let's recap:

Person A stole beer from a Circle K and took off

Person B called the DULY DEPUTIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT to report the crime and then followed the suspect, Person A, on his bike to identify him to police

Person A then threatened (or possibly attacked) Person B with a log

Person B shot Person A

Yet to Zappa the man who robbed the store and threatened the good Samaritan with a log is the victim here.
Click to expand...

Still waiting for anyone to show me when the ALLEGED thief was convicted of anything.

Wacko makes a lot of assumptions that have no basis in fact or reality.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Still waiting for anyone to show me when the ALLEGED thief was convicted of anything.

Wacko makes a lot of assumptions that have no basis in fact or reality.
Click to expand...

No basis in fact or reality? Please show me what is incorrect in what I posted above.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Still waiting for anyone to show me when the ALLEGED thief was convicted of anything.

Wacko makes a lot of assumptions that have no basis in fact or reality.
Click to expand...

How about you answer what your question of him being convicted has to do with what happened here?
 
Repercussions for stealing beer and threatening someone who's chasing you shouldn't be summary execution. Rightists just think the white man should have the right to kill any brown person they say
 
ZappasGuitar said:
You claim the man stole beer.

WHEN was the dead man CONVICTED of stealing beer?

If he hadn't yet been convicted, then he was INNOCENT.
Click to expand...

I see, you are wording smithing. Person A ALLEGEDLY stole beer.

Now please tell me what was incorrect in what I wrote in the summary.
 
This man should pay with his life. An eye for an eye. He should not be given the privilege of a trial, being that he thought it was unnecessary for this man.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top