Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

when seconds matter, cops are only minutes away. unless you carry a cop in your front pocket, sometimes WE THE PEOPLE must be the first responders. but to view the world in that way, you'd actually have to believe that the cops are our servants, whereas you believe they are your master.

A pack of beer from some corporate chain convenient store that makes a billion a year anyway is nothing. Stop trying to be a wannabe hero over a stupid pack of beer. Stop murdering people because you enjoy it and then putting sticks in their hand and claiming it wss self defense. It makes you look weak and pathetic.
 
You think a guy who is being followed after robbing a store has the right to threaten the good Samaritan with a log? Ok.

Robbery is theft involving a weapon, grabbing a pack of beer and running out of a store isn't robbery. He retained all rights of a citizen afterward.
 
oh, he knows. He doesn't like it that PEOPLE have to get involved. he hates people and loves government.

I like rational application of law, fair trials, and sentences proportional to the crime, I dislike mobs of armed lunatics running around and dispensing death for any and all perceived slights. You are an anarchist, you want mob rule.
 
This man should pay with his life. An eye for an eye. He should not be given the privilege of a trial, being that he thought it was unnecessary for this man.

I hope you have a home invasion, while your home.
And just before one of them beats you to death, I want you to tell him that you understand he's innocent.
 
race has nothing to do with whether or not he was justified in using force. You think the man should have let himself be physically harmed prior to defending himself.

It's what Watermark would do.
He'd curl up in a ball and cry like a baby.
"Please - please don't hurt me. If you don't hurt me, I'll let you fuck me in the ass."
 
Given his constant need to defend criminals by claiming someone was 'stalking them'... my guess is that Zappa, at some point in his past, thought someone was 'stalking him' and he turned and beat the crap out of a little old lady.

Heap that straw ever higher Simplefreak.
 
Guy was literally chasing this other guy down on a bike, he was under zero threat and it's not like the other guy was going to outmaneuver his bike on foot. He was just looking for an excuse to commit murder, because like all rightist he enjoys unnecessarily shedding his fellow man'sman's blood. And he should pay with his life.

No trial for vigilantes.

Clearly, the gunman wanted to kill someone that day.

He didn't get his chance in the Circle K parking lot, so he followed the victim until he could get a clear shot, then he executed him.
 
1) He wasn't murdered... he was killed in self defense
2) He wasn't innocent... he first stole from the store, he second attacked the good samaritan with a weapon

And when was he CONVICTED of the crimes you accuse him of?

He was INNOCENT until proven guilty in a court of law...sadly he never got his day in court thanks to a trigger happy gun nut out to satisfy his lust for blood.
 
Pretty sure thats not true.
Any other strawmen you want to build out of this beer theft?
Dumbass

Super's response is precisely the kind of bullshit strawman argument I'd expect from lunatic Righties who support a vigilante gun nut who had just murdered a man in cold blood.
 
1) He wasn't convicted because he died as a result of his stupidity prior to being charged and convicted
2) You pretending he was innocent is comical

Correct, his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS were taken away by a rabid gun nut out for blood.

His right to a FAIR TRIAL was taken away by a vigilante looking to kill.

His right to DUE PROCESS was taken away by another coward with his "courage" strapped to his hip.
 
Back
Top