Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

cawacko said:
So if someone attacks you with a log you'll sit there and let him hit you because he hasn't been convicted in court of anything?
Click to expand...

Guy was literally chasing this other guy down on a bike, he was under zero threat and it's not like the other guy was going to outmaneuver his bike on foot. He was just looking for an excuse to commit murder, because like all rightist he enjoys unnecessarily shedding his fellow man'sman's blood. And he should pay with his life.

No trial for vigilantes.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
When was the murdered man convicted of theft or attempted murder?

I defended the rights of an innocent man.

But, just like he did with his hero GZ, expect Grind to tell any lie necessary to demonize those he doesn't agree with.
Click to expand...

1) He wasn't murdered... he was killed in self defense
2) He wasn't innocent... he first stole from the store, he second attacked the good samaritan with a weapon
 
Underworld King Star said:
Guy was literally chasing this other guy down on a bike, he was under zero threat and it's not like the other guy was going to outmaneuver his bike on foot. He was just looking for an excuse to commit murder, because like all rightist he enjoys unnecessarily shedding his fellow man'sman's blood. And he should pay with his life.

No trial for vigilantes.
Click to expand...
We only like to kill emo's from Mississippi. This happened in AZ.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Still waiting for anyone to show me when the ALLEGED thief was convicted of anything.

Wacko makes a lot of assumptions that have no basis in fact or reality.
Click to expand...

1) He wasn't convicted because he died as a result of his stupidity prior to being charged and convicted
2) You pretending he was innocent is comical
 
Superfreak said:
1) He wasn't murdered... he was killed in self defense
2) He wasn't innocent... he first stole from the store, he second attacked the good samaritan with a weapon
Click to expand...

He attacked a sadistic monster who was looking for an excuse to kill. He should get a medal.

No trial. This man deserves death.
 
Underworld King Star said:
Repercussions for stealing beer and threatening someone who's chasing you shouldn't be summary execution. Rightists just think the white man should have the right to kill any brown person they say
Click to expand...

race has nothing to do with whether or not he was justified in using force. You think the man should have let himself be physically harmed prior to defending himself.
 
Dad of Desh said:
I know it's hard for people like us to understand, but the vast majority of our population are serfs. They would be perfectly content living in a monarchy under a king and being told exactly what to do.

Zappas is a serf. It's a completely different mindset than what natural free people like ourselves have.
Click to expand...

You would make a good slave, Grind. You always do what your rightist masters tell you.
 
Superfreak said:
race has nothing to do with whether or not he was justified in using force. You think the man should have let himself be physically harmed prior to defending himself.
Click to expand...

He was in a bike, he wasn't going to be outmaneuvered. This man just wanted to kill. He was ecstatic when the other man tried to use that log to force the gut chasing him down to keep guys distance and stop stalking him, he was under no threat and got the opportunity to kill.

Does it make you hard?

Rightists aren't human.
 
Why was he following so closely that he couldn't rationally been attacked with a log? Again, he was on a damn bike. Was this piece of wood like a mile long?
 
The guys story makes zero sense, I can't be attacked by someone with a stick riding my bike. I'm faster than they are.

I think he just shot the guy because he enjoyed it and then went and found a stick to put in his hand to give him a weak ass story. And you all buy it because you'll buy anything from a vigilante.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top