Vigilante gun Nut KILLS Innocent Man

[cawacko]

Seems like this was too tough a question for any of JPP's dim bulb Righties.

Why am I not surprised?

Holy sh*t. Wow!! In fact, double wow.

 

[zappasguitar]

That's because we were commending what was/is the right thing to do in this case, you fucking moron.

Understood.

You feel gunning down an alleged thief over a couple cases of beer is the RIGHT thing to do.

NO due process...NO trial by jury as the CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES.

And you are good with it.

 

[zappasguitar]

You think a guy who is being followed after robbing a store has the right to threaten the good Samaritan with a log? Ok.

I'll ask again...what crime had the alleged thief been convicted of?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Then there's THAT crazy little idea...leaving the policing duties to DULY DEPUTIZED LAW ENFORCEMENT.

Amazing how not a single JPP gun nut thought of it.

when seconds matter, cops are only minutes away. unless you carry a cop in your front pocket, sometimes WE THE PEOPLE must be the first responders. but to view the world in that way, you'd actually have to believe that the cops are our servants, whereas you believe they are your master.

 

[ChoppedLiver]

Understood.

You feel gunning down an alleged thief over a couple cases of beer is the RIGHT thing to do.

NO due process...NO trial by jury as the CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES.

And you are good with it.

Gawd, you are a fucking MORON!

If those good and peaceful folks weren't assaulted with a deadly weapon, they wouldn't have had to respond with deadly force.

The criminal didn't get himself killed over the minor crime of shoplifting.

Why is that so hard for even a moron like you to understand?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

""The witness had called police to report the theft and was following him to find out where he was headed, police said.""

http://tucson.com/news/blogs/police...cle_b5841f92-9c72-11e5-92e8-238a6a0693b0.html


So I guess this guy is evil for doing this. A sad sad day for America right Zap?

well, we already know that most of the libs here consider that stalking, therefore the beer thief was completely entitled to defend himself by threatening him with a club.

 

[ChoppedLiver]

I'll ask again...what crime had the alleged thief been convicted of?

That doesn't apply in this case, shit-for-brains.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I'll ask again...what crime had the alleged thief been convicted of?

if he'd have waited quietly with the man that followed him and let the police arrive, we'd know, but instead of waiting for the DULY APPOINTED LAW OFFICERS, he decided to attack the witness with a club. bad move.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

when seconds matter, cops are only minutes away. unless you carry a cop in your front pocket, sometimes WE THE PEOPLE must be the first responders. but to view the world in that way, you'd actually have to believe that the cops are our servants, whereas you believe they are your master.

Zappa is the type of good citizen that would let someone else get raped, murdered, mugged while waiting for the police.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Zappa is the type of good citizen that would let someone else get raped, murdered, mugged while waiting for the police.

he'd also let a kid get mauled to death by dogs while he looked for a 2x4 or lawn chair to beat the dog off instead of using a gun

 

[cawacko]

Zappa is the type of good citizen that would let someone else get raped, murdered, mugged while waiting for the police.

pretty much. Is his world there are no good Samaritans, only vigilantes.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

pretty much. Is his world there are no good Samaritans, only vigilantes.

I have to wonder if somewhere in zappas past, he trusted the wrong people and it has had a severe impact on the rest of his life leading him to distrust all people, trusting only government. very sad.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I have to wonder if somewhere in zappas past, he trusted the wrong people and it has had a severe impact on the rest of his life leading him to distrust all people, trusting only government. very sad.

Given his constant need to defend criminals by claiming someone was 'stalking them'... my guess is that Zappa, at some point in his past, thought someone was 'stalking him' and he turned and beat the crap out of a little old lady.

 

[zappasguitar]

Given his constant need to defend criminals by claiming someone was 'stalking them'... my guess is that Zappa, at some point in his past, thought someone was 'stalking him' and he turned and beat the crap out of a little old lady.

ROFL...please cite some evidence to corroborate your allegation regarding my "constant need to defend criminals".

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

ROFL...please cite some evidence to corroborate your allegation regarding my "constant need to defend criminals".

this thread is full of examples...

Trayvon Martin case... same thing

Michael Brown... same thing

 

[zappasguitar]

That doesn't apply in this case, shit-for-brains.

Yes, that's correct!

The alleged thief had been convicted of NO CRIME WHATSOEVER.

CL resorts to name calling because he can't stand to respond with the truth.

 

[zappasguitar]

when seconds matter, cops are only minutes away. unless you carry a cop in your front pocket, sometimes WE THE PEOPLE must be the first responders. but to view the world in that way, you'd actually have to believe that the cops are our servants, whereas you believe they are your master.

Why did seconds matter in this particular case?

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Righties condoning vigilante justice...a sad, sad day for America.

you condone stealing. Stealing is violence. By being upset that this man was killed, you also condone violence.

 

[cawacko]

I'll ask again...what crime had the alleged thief been convicted of?

No one is answering your question because it's irrelevant to what's being discussed.