Again, you are flat out wrong. A man who is not afraid ,will face the people and allow his questioning to be under the lights and under the eyes of the citizens.
Not Jimmy Comey! He's scared shitless to answer ALL of the questions in a closed door hearing that will be transcribed and then opened to the folks with only the actual classified info redacted and he can't plead "CLASSFIED INFORMATION NOT FOR THE PEOPLES EYES" Besides the creep can't put on his Big Jimmy grandstand show for the folks without the TV cameras, huh?
And why do you make up the tiime limits?
Only because they're the "TRUTH,"
Gowdy is in charge and makes the rules.
Not so! Public TV has a say in public hearings. They're not interested in single politicians and or witnesses putting on grandstanding shows, spinning their political views and campaigning for reelection before the cameras in endless diatribes without limits. They have time limit agreements with both Houses of the Congress.
Even a guy with you weak understanding of logic should be able to understand that speaking in public is how you get exposed.
What I actually understand is that you can't hold a conversational debate without at least one or more insults aimed at your opponent. It doesn't make you look intelligent, it only proves you have no valid arguments and you have a need to simply fill space with insults.
Logic has it that the TV cameras only display what the actors before them "expose." A dancing comic show, dancing around truths and or trying to convince others he's the sharpest knife in the drawer by avoiding questions by playing fast and loose with the rules. Presenting fake news or whatever worthless bullshit they're selling.
That is why Daffy refuses to be questioned at all. He will fill out a questionaire if he can control it.
"Daffy" was actually "daffy" enough to whip some female felon's ass in an election.
Aside from that The President is smart enough to know that a Never Trumper Republican with a house full of Democrat lawyer/prosecutors who hate him who hold the power of prosecution in their hands without any congressional oversight who are salivating to frame him with a perjury trap are way more dangerous to felons and innocent folk alike, unlike the Congress critters with congressional hearings, with ZERO ability to prosecute anybody, who's only power is to let in sunlight on the operators of the people's government.
In this case, Gowdy will control it, Not Comey, but Gowdy.
Actually, in either case, closed hearings or open hearings, Gowdy will have limited control. He must follow the House rules for open or closed hearings and that includes any and all time limits if any for the questioning of witnesses. Where in the United States and her laws do you ever find a legal hearing where "THE WITNESS" has control of the hearing aside from applying his/her constitutional rights?
You make no sense at all. Don't repeat that, you embarrass yourself.
Your opinions of me are worthless with me. I actually seek out your post to debunk, because they're so easily debunked. I can always count on your insulting tone and your pleasure in it proving who you really are. I really should look harder for higher competition, but I never can find it from the left.