T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And I commented on your comment.
No, you made more ad hominem on it.
And I commented on your comment.
No, you made more ad hominem on it.
Well, Obama being a racist bigot certainly didn't help. Then his being a Leftist was a blow because the Left never, ever, accepts any view but their own.
As for Trump, his problem is that he's a bloviating braggard and blowhard who engages his mouth without fully connecting to his brain. But a large part of his problem was the MSM has shifted far enough Left that it has the same unacceptance of anything they disagree with instilled in it now. That meant no matter what Trump said, however rational or irrational, it was going to be twisted into the most negative connotation and meaning the MSM could make it. Trump created divisiveness simply by not being a Leftist. His mere existence to the Left was an affront they could not let go of. This is why, depending on the media outlet, up to 95% + of what the reported on him was negative. Everything Trump said was then said by the MSM to be "a lie."
Obama created division by repeatedly siding with Black criminals early in widely reported incidents that incited rioting and protests. He did it more than once. As facts came out he usually had to walk back or shut up about the incident.
![]()
That was one great example of Obama's inherent bigotry and naïve view of American society. First, Biden was present only to equal out the numbers by race (racist). Then, Obama naively assumed that Sgt. James Crowley, the officer involved, being a "working man" would drink beer. In this he is joined by Pocahontas, Indian princess, Lizzy Warren and her beer drinking charade.
![]()
Another bit of elitist, Leftist, hubris showing how she, and Obama, are out-of-touch with most of America.
Whether Obama's creation of division was intentional or not, his merely being a Leftist was going to cause it because the Left is generally not clued in to what the average person is thinking, doing, or saying.
Obama invited his vice president to a meeting because he needed another white guy at the table? You know as well as I do that that's not true.
Then why is Biden there? He had nothing to do with the situation Obama created in commenting on this incident. What purpose does Biden's presence serve?
and not all bluebirds are blue.......you've been proven wrong and now you're proven stupid......
He was the vice president. He didn't go to meetings to be a token white dude. That is the stupidest fucking thing I have heard today.
It is not that it was a stupid remark, but it is he really believes shit like that. Biden was in most conferences and involved in policy.
Can you prove it? I would bet my house that you cant.
I find your stupidity boring.
that's debateable reasoning, but you concur that dems were more pro lockdown. thanks.
So you're saying you're pro virus?
false dichotomy fallacy.
That isn't what it means.
Being anti lockdown will only encourage faster spread of the virus.
To whatever extent lockdowns even work it’s like holding a finger down on the pause button. As soon as you take your finger off play resumes.
And while it’s on pause, the economy crashes, drug and alcohol abuse sky rockets, jobs are lost, along with myriad other human miseries.
I think that’s been safely established by now.
That isn't what it means.
Being anti lockdown will only encourage faster spread of the virus.
the virus is barely lethal.