Should we repeal "Don't ask, don't tell?"

Should we repeal this atrocity?


  • Total voters
    23
So you have to "serve your country" in order to be a great American. Is that your position? :)

Damn right you have to "serve" in order to be a great American. You have to do something for your country and your fellow countrymen besides what is absolutely required. Otherwise, you are just another self-serving asshole who makes demands without offering anything in return.
 
Because unlike you I care about the future of this country.

You care about your own future, not the future of this great nation.

You care about your own narrow views, not about the people of this great land.

You care about continuing the bigotry, not about freedoms.
 
Because it ain't normal, moral, natural or healthy: its queer. And as long as you don't act on your urge to butt-fuck your buddy, you can stay in the military and be legal as all hell.

Not this bullshit again?

Ok, so tell us how "normal" it is to put yourself in harms way to protect people you do not know? How "normal" is it to jump out of airplanes, shoot other humans, or the myriad of other things the military does??

"Normal" ain't part of the equation.

How "moral" is it to kill people? So "moral" isn't part of the equation.

How "healthy" is being shot at, being tear gassed, having explosives hidden to blow you up, or all the other things that happen in a war zone?

"Healthy" isn't part of the equation.

And "natural"?? :rofl: If you had joined instead of avoiding the military, you would know how ridiculous that standard is.
 
Because unlike you I care about the future of this country.
I cared so much about the future of my country I served in the military. You on the other hand do nothing more than TELL people what a great american you. You talk the talk but have NEVER walked the walk. Yet you are arrogant enough to say that only you and webb are the great americans and those on here that actually served and KNOW what that means don't care about the future. You are a chickenhawk.
 
The fact is Damo I wish I had served. In fact I think all able bodied high school graduates should. But I was influenced by other things back then, things that do not please me now, and one can't change history.
I call bullshit! You don't wish you had served. You just regret that it is not a card you can hold alongside all your hate and prejudice. If you had you would hit people over the head with it like a club and not wear the fact proudly and with humility. You are the worst kind of arrogant POS. Always crowing like a Banty Rooster, "look at me! Look at what a GREAT AMERICAN I am." You are the epitome of the ugly american. You care about no one but yourself and service in the military conflicts with that egocentric, selfish and pompus attitude of yours. Had you served you would be one of those guys that got a blanket party in his honor because you never thought of your buddies.
 
No.... try again. Here, you can google it.

Look up UCMJ. It's a punitive article by itself and included in article 134.
Article 134 deals with adultery- "clearly unacceptable conduct, and it reflects adversely on the service record of the military member."

Try again.
 
I call bullshit! You don't wish you had served. You just regret that it is not a card you can hold alongside all your hate and prejudice. If you had you would hit people over the head with it like a club and not wear the fact proudly and with humility. You are the worst kind of arrogant POS. Always crowing like a Banty Rooster, "look at me! Look at what a GREAT AMERICAN I am." You are the epitome of the ugly american. You care about no one but yourself and service in the military conflicts with that egocentric, selfish and pompus attitude of yours. Had you served you would be one of those guys that got a blanket party in his honor because you never thought of your buddies.
So much hate and baseless allegations from you, Asslicker. You fail again. :D
 
Article 134 deals with adultery- "clearly unacceptable conduct, and it reflects adversely on the service record of the military member."

Try again.
Article 125 directly states that Sodomy is illegal, even mentions that the slightest penetration is enough to subject you to court martial.

925. ARTICLE 125. SODOMY

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.

(b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

From this site:

http://www.ucmj.us/
 
Now queers want to change that.
Of course they do. Other articles changed the same way were against black people serving in the same battalions as whites, etc.

The reality is, the UCMJ can be changed with a stroke of a Presidential Pen and without need to make new civilian laws. Obama needs to man up and make decisions.
 
Back
Top