Religion Of Peace Alert: Muslims In The News....

It is t a religion. It is a political ideology disguised as a religion

Islam can be interpreted as a religion and millions of Muslims do it. The problem is it's too easily interpreted as a political ideology and the ideology is more comparable to Nazism than conservatism or liberalism. Islamists are supremacists that are bent on forcing their religious ideology onto non-believers.

Now, right about here lol, some wag will step in and say 'domestic Christians do the same thing'. No, they don't. Christianity is a religion that can't be made into a political philosophy without abusing its core tenets. Historically, when people have tried it, it's failed. Christianity was never forced on anyone in the Gospels---and there are scriptural reasons it wasn't.

The inconvenient possibility for the Islamophilic left, is that Islam isn't being hijacked by the Islamists. In other words, they are the ones practicing the pure and unadulterated Islam and the moderates aren't. But it's hard to get them to even entertain the question.

It's why when Trump talks about a moratorium on Muslim immigration, many non-Islamophiles think maybe it's not such a bad idea.
 
[h=1]The whipping girl: Screaming in agony, a woman collapses as she and a man are caned under Sharia law in Indonesia merely for being 'seen in close proximity' to each other without being married[/h]
  • The woman was accused of getting too close to a fellow university student
  • As the pair are unmarried, she had committed an offence under Sharia law
  • She was brought to a mosque where she was caned in front of a crowd
  • The woman received five lashes and at end had to be taken to hospital

Hundreds of people gathered outside a mosque in Indonesia to see a woman scream out in agony after being caned as a punishment for being in 'close proximity' to a man she wasn't married to.
Nur Elita was marched to the yard of Baiturrahumim Mosque in Banda Aceh for violating the region's strict Sharia laws, after she allegedly showed affectionate behaviour to a fellow university student.


Under the law men and women, who are not spouses, are not allowed to get too close due to the the 'khalwat' offence and punishment is by public caning.



2FA9333A00000578-3377187-image-a-10_1451384544881.jpg


The woman is brought to the stage by two female members of the Sharia Police and is put in position on her knees


2FA9337500000578-3377187-image-a-4_1451378219906.jpg


She screams out in agony after being whipped in a caning ceremony outside a mosque in Indonesia's Banda Aceh region


2FA57FAE00000578-3377187-image-a-6_1451378243995.jpg


The woman was forced to endure the punishment after breaking the region's strict Sharia law on being to close to a man she was not married to


2FA9335600000578-3377187-image-a-7_1451378248917.jpg


After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane


2FA9337100000578-3377187-image-a-9_1451384528510.jpg


Hundreds of people gathered outside the mosque in Banda Aceh to watch the caning, with some spectators holding up cameras


2FA754DA00000578-3377187-image-m-11_1451378275468.jpg



2FA7562900000578-3377187-image-a-12_1451378281221.jpg



In total, the woman received five lashes from the masked man who carried out the caning outside the mosque



After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nesian-region-s-sharia-law.html#ixzz3vijY8GzZ

roflmao.gif


Another typical display of peaceful muslims...

That's another problem with those idiot muslimes.

They dish out their crap to the wrong people.

I can see them justifying something like the punishment they're dishing out (pictured above) to the likes of Rana and that fat pig friend of hers/its.

Those two twats DESERVE shit like that and more.
 
My Economist tells me this morning that the proportion of atheists in Saudi Arabia is the same as that in the US. I don't know what this is based on, but it suggests that I am right in my estimate of the similarity of the two societies and of those within them who want to destroy others. :)
 
That's another problem with those idiot muslimes.

They dish out their crap to the wrong people.

I can see them justifying something like the punishment they're dishing out (pictured above) to the likes of Rana and that fat pig friend of hers/its.

Those two twats DESERVE shit like that and more.

That's bad. They ought to put their female criminals to work;

article-0-13D3BFB3000005DC-84_964x504.jpg
 
That's another problem with those idiot muslimes.

They dish out their crap to the wrong people.

I can see them justifying something like the punishment they're dishing out (pictured above) to the likes of Rana and that fat pig friend of hers/its.

Those two twats DESERVE shit like that and more.

you are more evil than those people are



YOU would KILL if you had power


you are evil
 
My Economist tells me this morning that the proportion of atheists in Saudi Arabia is the same as that in the US. I don't know what this is based on, but it suggests that I am right in my estimate of the similarity of the two societies and of those within them who want to destroy others. :)

yes

its evil power desires


all organized religion has these evil tards in them
 
Islam can be interpreted as a religion and millions of Muslims do it. The problem is it's too easily interpreted as a political ideology and the ideology is more comparable to Nazism than conservatism or liberalism. Islamists are supremacists that are bent on forcing their religious ideology onto non-believers.

Now, right about here lol, some wag will step in and say 'domestic Christians do the same thing'. No, they don't. Christianity is a religion that can't be made into a political philosophy without abusing its core tenets. Historically, when people have tried it, it's failed. Christianity was never forced on anyone in the Gospels---and there are scriptural reasons it wasn't.

The inconvenient possibility for the Islamophilic left, is that Islam isn't being hijacked by the Islamists. In other words, they are the ones practicing the pure and unadulterated Islam and the moderates aren't. But it's hard to get them to even entertain the question.

It's why when Trump talks about a moratorium on Muslim immigration, many non-Islamophiles think maybe it's not such a bad idea.

The majority muslim nations all practice Sharia law, and have harsh rules. Especially against gays and women. Yet libs will defend Islam to their death, while still pretending to be pro women/gay. Its pretty fascinating to watch.
 
[h=1]The whipping girl: Screaming in agony, a woman collapses as she and a man are caned under Sharia law in Indonesia merely for being 'seen in close proximity' to each other without being married[/h]
  • The woman was accused of getting too close to a fellow university student
  • As the pair are unmarried, she had committed an offence under Sharia law
  • She was brought to a mosque where she was caned in front of a crowd
  • The woman received five lashes and at end had to be taken to hospital

Hundreds of people gathered outside a mosque in Indonesia to see a woman scream out in agony after being caned as a punishment for being in 'close proximity' to a man she wasn't married to.
Nur Elita was marched to the yard of Baiturrahumim Mosque in Banda Aceh for violating the region's strict Sharia laws, after she allegedly showed affectionate behaviour to a fellow university student.


Under the law men and women, who are not spouses, are not allowed to get too close due to the the 'khalwat' offence and punishment is by public caning.



2FA9333A00000578-3377187-image-a-10_1451384544881.jpg


The woman is brought to the stage by two female members of the Sharia Police and is put in position on her knees


2FA9337500000578-3377187-image-a-4_1451378219906.jpg


She screams out in agony after being whipped in a caning ceremony outside a mosque in Indonesia's Banda Aceh region


2FA57FAE00000578-3377187-image-a-6_1451378243995.jpg


The woman was forced to endure the punishment after breaking the region's strict Sharia law on being to close to a man she was not married to


2FA9335600000578-3377187-image-a-7_1451378248917.jpg


After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane


2FA9337100000578-3377187-image-a-9_1451384528510.jpg


Hundreds of people gathered outside the mosque in Banda Aceh to watch the caning, with some spectators holding up cameras


2FA754DA00000578-3377187-image-m-11_1451378275468.jpg



2FA7562900000578-3377187-image-a-12_1451378281221.jpg



In total, the woman received five lashes from the masked man who carried out the caning outside the mosque



After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nesian-region-s-sharia-law.html#ixzz3vijY8GzZ

roflmao.gif


Another typical display of peaceful muslims...

I thought libs kept telling us Indonesia was the great moderate nation, that shows us that Islam can be peaceful. Whoops. They also recently approved canning as a punishment for being gay.

But libs live in la la land.
 
The majority muslim nations all practice Sharia law, and have harsh rules. Especially against gays and women. Yet libs will defend Islam to their death, while still pretending to be pro women/gay. Its pretty fascinating to watch.

Islam presents a dilemma for them. Their historical narrative asserts that Christianity is the 'bad religion' since white male Europeans are responsible for enslaving or otherwise oppressing Africans, Middle Easterners, American Indians---just about everyone who had the misfortune to come into contact with them.

And the white male Europeans were largely Christian or at least came from a Christian heritage. So, Christianity=bad lol.

Note how off base that is, historically. Islam nearly conquered Europe but was turned back at the battle of Tours, thanks to largely Christian men. Suppose Europe had been conquered and then culturally Islamified several centuries ago. Talk about an historical game changer. I don't know, maybe liberal's think that would be no biggie lol. Political correctness be damned, I'm glad my name really isn't Omar lol.

Yes, thank you, Christian Crusaders and Charles Martel.

Then there's slavery. Yes, white Christian Europeans took black slaves from Africa and it's morally repugnant. But guess what? Lots and lots of people were involved in the African slave market, including black Africans and Muslims. I guess liberal's think the white guys would land in Africa and go capture them some slaves lol. Imagine how that would go. No, they needed the help of other black Africans. Somehow that never comes up when the subject of reparations comes around.

Then there's Muslim slave trade. These boys rocked it lol. Not only did Muslims take blacks for slaves, they took EVERYONE who wasn't Muslim for slaves. One thing you could say for the Muslim slavers is they weren't racially prejudiced. I don't have the numbers, but the Barbary pirates took whites from Europe and made either slaves or concubines out of them. Another inconvenient fact is that you really, really didn't want to be captured by the Muslims because you would probably be literally worked to death. Unlike the blacks who were captured and taken by whites to the New World. If they survived the trip, they had a decent chance at survival. Where do liberal's think our significant minority of blacks came from lol.

And one is forced to suppose that's because they were captured by Christians and not Muslims.

So yeah, liberal's don't quite know what to do with Islam. The narrative informs them it's not supposed to be this way, but their narrative is flat out wrong.
 
Islam presents a dilemma for them. Their historical narrative asserts that Christianity is the 'bad religion' since white male Europeans are responsible for enslaving or otherwise oppressing Africans, Middle Easterners, American Indians---just about everyone who had the misfortune to come into contact with them.

And the white male Europeans were largely Christian or at least came from a Christian heritage. So, Christianity=bad lol.

Note how off base that is, historically. Islam nearly conquered Europe but was turned back at the battle of Tours, thanks to largely Christian men. Suppose Europe had been conquered and then culturally Islamified several centuries ago. Talk about an historical game changer. I don't know, maybe liberal's think that would be no biggie lol. Political correctness be damned, I'm glad my name really isn't Omar lol.

Yes, thank you, Christian Crusaders and Charles Martel.

Then there's slavery. Yes, white Christian Europeans took black slaves from Africa and it's morally repugnant. But guess what? Lots and lots of people were involved in the African slave market, including black Africans and Muslims. I guess liberal's think the white guys would land in Africa and go capture them some slaves lol. Imagine how that would go. No, they needed the help of other black Africans. Somehow that never comes up when the subject of reparations comes around.

Then there's Muslim slave trade. These boys rocked it lol. Not only did Muslims take blacks for slaves, they took EVERYONE who wasn't Muslim for slaves. One thing you could say for the Muslim slavers is they weren't racially prejudiced. I don't have the numbers, but the Barbary pirates took whites from Europe and made either slaves or concubines out of them. Another inconvenient fact is that you really, really didn't want to be captured by the Muslims because you would probably be literally worked to death. Unlike the blacks who were captured and taken by whites to the New World. If they survived the trip, they had a decent chance at survival. Where do liberal's think our significant minority of blacks came from lol.

And one is forced to suppose that's because they were captured by Christians and not Muslims.

So yeah, liberal's don't quite know what to do with Islam. The narrative informs them it's not supposed to be this way, but their narrative is flat out wrong.

every organized religion has BAD in it


they are ALL tainted with evil



they are myths that have outlived their real purpose


to get mankind to be KIND


your ramblings there above are nothing but crap from YOUR brain and not reality
 
White people suck lol!

always with the racism huh


how can you blame black people for slavery when you REFUSE to admit the white peoples responsibilities for slavery.



who paid the money ?


who then used those slaves for all their lives and their childrens lives?


accept history and quit trying to minimize what actaully happened
 
Islam presents a dilemma for them. Their historical narrative asserts that Christianity is the 'bad religion' since white male Europeans are responsible for enslaving or otherwise oppressing Africans, Middle Easterners, American Indians---just about everyone who had the misfortune to come into contact with them.

And the white male Europeans were largely Christian or at least came from a Christian heritage. So, Christianity=bad lol.

Note how off base that is, historically. Islam nearly conquered Europe but was turned back at the battle of Tours, thanks to largely Christian men. Suppose Europe had been conquered and then culturally Islamified several centuries ago. Talk about an historical game changer. I don't know, maybe liberal's think that would be no biggie lol. Political correctness be damned, I'm glad my name really isn't Omar lol.

Yes, thank you, Christian Crusaders and Charles Martel.

Then there's slavery. Yes, white Christian Europeans took black slaves from Africa and it's morally repugnant. But guess what? Lots and lots of people were involved in the African slave market, including black Africans and Muslims. I guess liberal's think the white guys would land in Africa and go capture them some slaves lol. Imagine how that would go. No, they needed the help of other black Africans. Somehow that never comes up when the subject of reparations comes around.

Then there's Muslim slave trade. These boys rocked it lol. Not only did Muslims take blacks for slaves, they took EVERYONE who wasn't Muslim for slaves. One thing you could say for the Muslim slavers is they weren't racially prejudiced. I don't have the numbers, but the Barbary pirates took whites from Europe and made either slaves or concubines out of them. Another inconvenient fact is that you really, really didn't want to be captured by the Muslims because you would probably be literally worked to death. Unlike the blacks who were captured and taken by whites to the New World. If they survived the trip, they had a decent chance at survival. Where do liberal's think our significant minority of blacks came from lol.

And one is forced to suppose that's because they were captured by Christians and not Muslims.

So yeah, liberal's don't quite know what to do with Islam. The narrative informs them it's not supposed to be this way, but their narrative is flat out wrong.

That wasn't the only time muslims tried to conquer Europe either. The Persian Empire tried to take over, and only thanks to Greece and their spartan fighters were they stopped.

White people were slaves too. In egypt, and in Europe by the Romans, and many other places.

And you're right, the slave trade was propagated by other black Africans who sold other tribesmen to the white euros.

So if libs believe the white european christian is the real evil in the world even to this day, and cause of all the worlds problems, doesn't that make them ISIS sympathisers?

Could this be why Obama and others don't really condemn ISIS or even want to talk about them much?
 
your fucking lies are not reality get it asshole



you lying about what people believe is not what they believe OK you brain dead fucking racist sociopathic brain cancer level evil shithead
 
always with the racism huh


how can you blame black people for slavery when you REFUSE to admit the white peoples responsibilities for slavery.



who paid the money ?


who then used those slaves for all their lives and their childrens lives?


accept history and quit trying to minimize what actaully happened

THIS you fucking asshole




you can not pretend your racism away by using republican talking point memes to avoid the cou try having a real discussion about race.



You racists can never win this


you can only become a societal scourge.


that is your future


the rest of us will have the discussion you so want to avoid and then you will be recognized as the fucking scourge you are


you idiot talkin g point racist memes will only make it more apparent to the VAST majority that you are evil and stupid.


gulp the tar you sociopaths
 
Iranian doctor's planned talk on Islam and homosexuality outrages some in Sanford


SEMINOLE COUNTY, Fla. — When Dr. Farrohk Sekaleshfar took the podium Monday night at the Husseini Islamic Center in Sanford to give a talk on women’s issues, attendees said his talk was well-received.

The discussion he was slated to have at the Center Tuesday, though, caused a stir in the city, with some calling English-born Sekaleshfar’s stance “reprehensible.”

Homosexuality as it applies to Islam is a topic Sekaleshfar has been addressing since at least 2013, when he addressed a crowd at the University of Michigan.


The rhetoric in that talk, which was posted on YouTube, was something that resident Alan Komman could not believe was coming to Sanford.

Sekaleshfar was blunt in the 2013 speech, admitting that under Islamic law, the punishment for homosexuality was death.

At the same time, he pointed out that it was the act that should be hated, not the person. “Because the sinner is Allah’s creation,” he said. “You could never hate Allah’s creation.”
Even the punishment for the act of homosexuality is one of love, Sekaleshfar argued. “We see the physical killing as something brutal, and this is the point when human hatred toward the act has to be done out of love,” he said in the 2013 talk. “You have to be happy for that person ... we believe in an afterlife, we believe in an eternal life … and with this sentence, you will be forgiven and you won’t be accountable in the hereafter.” In that way, “It’s for his own betterment that he leaves,” Sekaleshfar said.

“We have to have that compassion for people. With homosexuals, it’s the same,” he said. “Out of compassion, let’s get rid of them now.”

At the same time, he said it was different if the homosexual act was done in private. “Because you can’t enter people’s houses to see if they’re occupied in the act,” he said. “Inside their houses they can do whatever they want, they’re free.”

To be convicted of committing a homosexual act under Islamic law, four people have to witness it, he explained. That rarely happens, he said.

Sekaleshfar’s talk scheduled for 8:30 p.m. Tuesday in Sanford was titled “How to deal with the phenomenon of homosexuality” on the Islamic Center’s website, but specifics were not given. Sekaleshfar could not be reached for comment.

A leader at the Islamic Center told Channel 9 that he believes they have the right to have anyone speak and that Tuesday’s talk was a private event. He did not believe there was any reason to be concerned that Sekaleshfar’s talk could incite violence.

In the 2013 talk, Sekaleshfar did not see Islam’s take on homosexuality as a condemnation of homosexuals. “True, people can’t be judged and all people are good,” he said. “They’re God’s creatures and that’s why everyone is good … so, is Islam homophobic? This is inaccurate, because there’s no hatred against such people.”

People like Komman, disagree. “It’s appalling,” he said. “In fact, it’s inciting violence against gays, and I find that reprehensible.”


http://www.wftv.com/news/local/iran...osexuality-outrages-some-in-sanford/185803158


Say it aint so, muslims want gays exterminated???
 
[h=1]Atheist Law Student Hacked To Death In Bangladesh[/h]




ap_637781174536_custom-8090f03ca67004cec391b9647ce5e53cb14da402-s800-c85.jpg


Bangladeshi students protest on Thursday.





A 28-year-old atheist law student has been killed in Bangladesh. The attack follows a string of murders last year targeting outspoken advocates of secularism.


Nazimuddin Samad, a student at Jagannath University, was hacked and shot on Wednesday night while he was walking in Bangladesh's capital, Dhaka, The Associated Press reports. Multiple attackers, who were reportedly riding on a motorcycle, have not been identified. They escaped while praising Allah, according to the news service.


Samad was an outspoken atheist who criticized radical Islam and promoted secularism on his Facebook page, the AP writes. It adds:

"A supporter of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina's secular Awami League party, Samad also took part in the movement that successfully pushed for prosecutors to have more scope for going after suspected war criminals."


The Dhaka Tribune
describes him as an activist with that movement, which is called Ganajagaran Mancha.


The perpetrators and the motive haven't been identified by police, the BBC reports.


Last year, at least four secular bloggers were hacked to death in Bangladesh and a publisher who worked with one of those bloggers was stabbed to death. After one of those murders, the editor of the Dhaka Tribune, Zafar Sobhan,spoke to NPR's Robert Siegel about the rising tensions between secularists and Islamists in Bangladesh.

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...ist-law-student-hacked-to-death-in-bangladesh
 
Back
Top