canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
When will people learn? This is no religion of peace. Although there are some moderates, the religion itself is built on death and destruction.
It is t a religion. It is a political ideology disguised as a religion
When will people learn? This is no religion of peace. Although there are some moderates, the religion itself is built on death and destruction.
It is t a religion. It is a political ideology disguised as a religion
[h=1]The whipping girl: Screaming in agony, a woman collapses as she and a man are caned under Sharia law in Indonesia merely for being 'seen in close proximity' to each other without being married[/h]
- The woman was accused of getting too close to a fellow university student
- As the pair are unmarried, she had committed an offence under Sharia law
- She was brought to a mosque where she was caned in front of a crowd
- The woman received five lashes and at end had to be taken to hospital
Hundreds of people gathered outside a mosque in Indonesia to see a woman scream out in agony after being caned as a punishment for being in 'close proximity' to a man she wasn't married to.
Nur Elita was marched to the yard of Baiturrahumim Mosque in Banda Aceh for violating the region's strict Sharia laws, after she allegedly showed affectionate behaviour to a fellow university student.
Under the law men and women, who are not spouses, are not allowed to get too close due to the the 'khalwat' offence and punishment is by public caning.
![]()
The woman is brought to the stage by two female members of the Sharia Police and is put in position on her knees
![]()
She screams out in agony after being whipped in a caning ceremony outside a mosque in Indonesia's Banda Aceh region
![]()
The woman was forced to endure the punishment after breaking the region's strict Sharia law on being to close to a man she was not married to
![]()
After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane
![]()
Hundreds of people gathered outside the mosque in Banda Aceh to watch the caning, with some spectators holding up cameras
![]()
![]()
In total, the woman received five lashes from the masked man who carried out the caning outside the mosque
After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nesian-region-s-sharia-law.html#ixzz3vijY8GzZ
![]()
Another typical display of peaceful muslims...
That's another problem with those idiot muslimes.
They dish out their crap to the wrong people.
I can see them justifying something like the punishment they're dishing out (pictured above) to the likes of Rana and that fat pig friend of hers/its.
Those two twats DESERVE shit like that and more.
That's another problem with those idiot muslimes.
They dish out their crap to the wrong people.
I can see them justifying something like the punishment they're dishing out (pictured above) to the likes of Rana and that fat pig friend of hers/its.
Those two twats DESERVE shit like that and more.
My Economist tells me this morning that the proportion of atheists in Saudi Arabia is the same as that in the US. I don't know what this is based on, but it suggests that I am right in my estimate of the similarity of the two societies and of those within them who want to destroy others.![]()
Islam can be interpreted as a religion and millions of Muslims do it. The problem is it's too easily interpreted as a political ideology and the ideology is more comparable to Nazism than conservatism or liberalism. Islamists are supremacists that are bent on forcing their religious ideology onto non-believers.
Now, right about here lol, some wag will step in and say 'domestic Christians do the same thing'. No, they don't. Christianity is a religion that can't be made into a political philosophy without abusing its core tenets. Historically, when people have tried it, it's failed. Christianity was never forced on anyone in the Gospels---and there are scriptural reasons it wasn't.
The inconvenient possibility for the Islamophilic left, is that Islam isn't being hijacked by the Islamists. In other words, they are the ones practicing the pure and unadulterated Islam and the moderates aren't. But it's hard to get them to even entertain the question.
It's why when Trump talks about a moratorium on Muslim immigration, many non-Islamophiles think maybe it's not such a bad idea.
[h=1]The whipping girl: Screaming in agony, a woman collapses as she and a man are caned under Sharia law in Indonesia merely for being 'seen in close proximity' to each other without being married[/h]
- The woman was accused of getting too close to a fellow university student
- As the pair are unmarried, she had committed an offence under Sharia law
- She was brought to a mosque where she was caned in front of a crowd
- The woman received five lashes and at end had to be taken to hospital
Hundreds of people gathered outside a mosque in Indonesia to see a woman scream out in agony after being caned as a punishment for being in 'close proximity' to a man she wasn't married to.
Nur Elita was marched to the yard of Baiturrahumim Mosque in Banda Aceh for violating the region's strict Sharia laws, after she allegedly showed affectionate behaviour to a fellow university student.
Under the law men and women, who are not spouses, are not allowed to get too close due to the the 'khalwat' offence and punishment is by public caning.
![]()
The woman is brought to the stage by two female members of the Sharia Police and is put in position on her knees
![]()
She screams out in agony after being whipped in a caning ceremony outside a mosque in Indonesia's Banda Aceh region
![]()
The woman was forced to endure the punishment after breaking the region's strict Sharia law on being to close to a man she was not married to
![]()
After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane
![]()
Hundreds of people gathered outside the mosque in Banda Aceh to watch the caning, with some spectators holding up cameras
![]()
![]()
In total, the woman received five lashes from the masked man who carried out the caning outside the mosque
After being brought to the stage as the crowd cheered, the woman was forced to kneel down while a masked man repeatedly whipped her with the cane.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...nesian-region-s-sharia-law.html#ixzz3vijY8GzZ
![]()
Another typical display of peaceful muslims...
It is t a religion. It is a political ideology disguised as a religion
The majority muslim nations all practice Sharia law, and have harsh rules. Especially against gays and women. Yet libs will defend Islam to their death, while still pretending to be pro women/gay. Its pretty fascinating to watch.
White slavery and people trafficking is BIG business in Europe TODAY.
Islam presents a dilemma for them. Their historical narrative asserts that Christianity is the 'bad religion' since white male Europeans are responsible for enslaving or otherwise oppressing Africans, Middle Easterners, American Indians---just about everyone who had the misfortune to come into contact with them.
And the white male Europeans were largely Christian or at least came from a Christian heritage. So, Christianity=bad lol.
Note how off base that is, historically. Islam nearly conquered Europe but was turned back at the battle of Tours, thanks to largely Christian men. Suppose Europe had been conquered and then culturally Islamified several centuries ago. Talk about an historical game changer. I don't know, maybe liberal's think that would be no biggie lol. Political correctness be damned, I'm glad my name really isn't Omar lol.
Yes, thank you, Christian Crusaders and Charles Martel.
Then there's slavery. Yes, white Christian Europeans took black slaves from Africa and it's morally repugnant. But guess what? Lots and lots of people were involved in the African slave market, including black Africans and Muslims. I guess liberal's think the white guys would land in Africa and go capture them some slaves lol. Imagine how that would go. No, they needed the help of other black Africans. Somehow that never comes up when the subject of reparations comes around.
Then there's Muslim slave trade. These boys rocked it lol. Not only did Muslims take blacks for slaves, they took EVERYONE who wasn't Muslim for slaves. One thing you could say for the Muslim slavers is they weren't racially prejudiced. I don't have the numbers, but the Barbary pirates took whites from Europe and made either slaves or concubines out of them. Another inconvenient fact is that you really, really didn't want to be captured by the Muslims because you would probably be literally worked to death. Unlike the blacks who were captured and taken by whites to the New World. If they survived the trip, they had a decent chance at survival. Where do liberal's think our significant minority of blacks came from lol.
And one is forced to suppose that's because they were captured by Christians and not Muslims.
So yeah, liberal's don't quite know what to do with Islam. The narrative informs them it's not supposed to be this way, but their narrative is flat out wrong.
White people suck lol!
Islam presents a dilemma for them. Their historical narrative asserts that Christianity is the 'bad religion' since white male Europeans are responsible for enslaving or otherwise oppressing Africans, Middle Easterners, American Indians---just about everyone who had the misfortune to come into contact with them.
And the white male Europeans were largely Christian or at least came from a Christian heritage. So, Christianity=bad lol.
Note how off base that is, historically. Islam nearly conquered Europe but was turned back at the battle of Tours, thanks to largely Christian men. Suppose Europe had been conquered and then culturally Islamified several centuries ago. Talk about an historical game changer. I don't know, maybe liberal's think that would be no biggie lol. Political correctness be damned, I'm glad my name really isn't Omar lol.
Yes, thank you, Christian Crusaders and Charles Martel.
Then there's slavery. Yes, white Christian Europeans took black slaves from Africa and it's morally repugnant. But guess what? Lots and lots of people were involved in the African slave market, including black Africans and Muslims. I guess liberal's think the white guys would land in Africa and go capture them some slaves lol. Imagine how that would go. No, they needed the help of other black Africans. Somehow that never comes up when the subject of reparations comes around.
Then there's Muslim slave trade. These boys rocked it lol. Not only did Muslims take blacks for slaves, they took EVERYONE who wasn't Muslim for slaves. One thing you could say for the Muslim slavers is they weren't racially prejudiced. I don't have the numbers, but the Barbary pirates took whites from Europe and made either slaves or concubines out of them. Another inconvenient fact is that you really, really didn't want to be captured by the Muslims because you would probably be literally worked to death. Unlike the blacks who were captured and taken by whites to the New World. If they survived the trip, they had a decent chance at survival. Where do liberal's think our significant minority of blacks came from lol.
And one is forced to suppose that's because they were captured by Christians and not Muslims.
So yeah, liberal's don't quite know what to do with Islam. The narrative informs them it's not supposed to be this way, but their narrative is flat out wrong.
always with the racism huh
how can you blame black people for slavery when you REFUSE to admit the white peoples responsibilities for slavery.
who paid the money ?
who then used those slaves for all their lives and their childrens lives?
accept history and quit trying to minimize what actaully happened