Pro lifers show no mercy

Are uncooperative convicts force-fed?

Seems to me that a hostess on a hunger strike might be subject to the same treatment, especially since her voluntarily self-induced malnutrition risks harm to another...

Any 'hostess' I ever heard of had the right to ask 'guests' to leave.

ROFLMAO
 
She could. Those are also CHOICES. And people may kill wasps that affect them (their house, apt, yard, etc) without question or censure. See...cuz those wasps are their business. Good one!

Sanctioning the killing of all stinging insects to 'protect' the 'choice' of people with allergies to refrain from engaging in risky behavior is the natural result of that thinking, isn't it?

Or should society instead tell people with allergies to take reasonable precautions to avoid being stung?
 
Sanctioning the killing of all stinging insects to 'protect' the 'choice' of people with allergies to refrain from engaging in risky behavior is the natural result of that thinking, isn't it?

Or should society instead tell people with allergies to take reasonable precautions to avoid being stung?

Nope. Sorry, I dont understand your thought processes. (And to be honest, I'm thankful for that.)
 
Nope. Sorry, I dont understand your thought processes. (And to be honest, I'm thankful for that.)

It's like this; your claim that abortion on demand is justifiable because some womens health might be negatively impacted by childbearing is specious, since those women can easily avoid that risk without killing babies they're already hosting.
 
No, does the right to life of the fetus supersede the right to life or pursuit of happiness (risks to health from pregnancy, education, career, safety & security that a better income would support, etc) of the woman?

Pregnancy carries risks of permanent health damage or even death. Does the unborn have rights that supersede the already born?

right to life, no.....we've already covered that......right to pursuit of happiness, absolutely.......

does your neighbor's right to life supersede your right to pursue happiness?......of course......life always supersedes happiness......
 
right to life, no.....we've already covered that......right to pursuit of happiness, absolutely.......

does your neighbor's right to life supersede your right to pursue happiness?......of course......life always supersedes happiness......

No, you did not 'cover' right to life.

Nowhere did you explain to me how the fetus's right to life supersedes the woman's.
 
No, you did not 'cover' right to life.

Nowhere did you explain to me how the fetus's right to life supersedes the woman's.

I "explained" by saying it doesn't.....when a right to life conflicts with a right to life there are different considerations than there are when a right to life conflicts with a right of privacy.....that is why we use phrases such as "except when the life of the mother is threatened".......
 
Back
Top