Pro lifers show no mercy

Maybe if that's the case, she should elect to use birth control or refrain from sex, since she finds the risk unacceptable.

We don't advocate the slaughter of wasps because some people are allergic to stings.

She could. Those are also CHOICES.

And people may kill wasps that affect them (their house, apt, yard, etc) without question or censure. See...cuz those wasps are their business.

Good one!
 
Did I say that? Where in my post did I suggest that people have stopped reproducing? Why is your argument so packed full of deceit? Why are liberals so comfortable with trying to deceive people? What is it about spreading destruction as well as lies that turns you on?


Pretty much implied here. Dont you even understand what you write? lol

That's all you, comrade. We're just trying to restore the process of life. It takes a lot of work to stop brainless heathens like you from spreading destruction.
 
Correct. Is there some reason why an unborn fetus's (that might never even survive to birth) rights should supercede hers?

yes....some rights have greater value than others.....a right to life on the part of the unborn child is greater than a right of privacy held by the mother......or do you have a right to keep something private even if it costs someone else's life?....
 
I am okay with killing unborn ADULT unicorns. There are as many of them killed by abortion as there are unborn children. None. You mean fetuses. You are abusing the language and this time it does not appear to be due to your incredibly vast ignorance as it was with "hybrid," "ancestor" and "recent." It's just propaganda and blatant lies.

the problem isn't with my understanding of English, its with your understanding of science.....
 
yes....some rights have greater value than others.....a right to life on the part of the unborn child is greater than a right of privacy held by the mother......or do you have a right to keep something private even if it costs someone else's life?....

No, does the right to life of the fetus supersede the right to life or pursuit of happiness (risks to health from pregnancy, education, career, safety & security that a better income would support, etc) of the woman?

Pregnancy carries risks of permanent health damage or even death. Does the unborn have rights that supersede the already born?
 
Are uncooperative convicts force-fed?

Seems to me that a hostess on a hunger strike might be subject to the same treatment, especially since her voluntarily self-induced malnutrition risks harm to another...
 
Back
Top