Liar, Liar

dukkha said:
Our Firm no longer represents Tara Reade. Our decision, made on May 20, is by no means a reflection on whether then-Senator Biden sexually assaulted Ms. Reade,” Douglas Wigdor wote. “On that point, our view — which is the same view held by the majority of Americans, according to a Harvard CAPS-Harris Poll — has not changed.”
Click to expand...

So what??????????
 
The Reds jumped on the Reade train immediately. They had their scandal. Only it was a lie and she was probably paid off by rightys. I wait for the first red to apologize for all the threads and lies about Biden. But this is no outlier. This is what the right does. Truth is not needed, just a narrative they can run with.
 
dukkha said:
what a retard! YOU used the word "disputed" -the woman's friend was skeptical - is that the same thing or not?
She had 'grave doubts' is how I would have put it (skeptical) - but you chose the word "disputed"

Either way Ford's friend did not "believe her" - whether it was skepticism on her part or she disputed Ford's claim makes no difference. Nobody could back up Ford capiche'?
For an English teacher you do a piss poor job of comprehending ideas.
Click to expand...

What a retard!!!! You claimed the two wiords are interchangeable when they are not.

Skeptical means to have doubts about something. Disputed means one openly denied something.

You are either a semi-literate dumbass or a craven shill for the right.

I suspect equal measures of both.

As far as not being able to back up Ford's claim.... not having seen something with one's own eyes and therefor not being able to confirm or deny it happened, has nothing to do with skepticism or denial.

I am obviously light years ahead of you when it comes to logical, conceptual thinking and comprehension.

dukkha said:
and this bullshit about "believe" ( the heart of the argument) is selective usage by Dems.
They jump onboard when convenient, and then deny the same criteria when it goes against Biden
Click to expand...

More lying Trumptard bullshit.

Just because your scumbag ilk intentionally mischaracterize and twist the meanings of everything said by those who don't lick Trump's boots along side you, says nothing about us.

Your rank, blatant dishonesty does not make us guilty of hypocrisy.
 
dukkha said:
so you are an idiot if you can't see she wasn't dropped over credibility issues - but we all knew that about you already
Click to expand...

Lawyers are out there to make money, after her past was revealed about her lies, the lawyer saw that he was whipping a dead horse, and dropped her, apparently you're just not smart enough to understand that.
 
Stretch said:
Try again. The whole #metoo thing was based on "We must believe every woman". If it was only a lowly "benefit of the doubt"
the whole Kav thing would not have been pushed so hard with all the marches, protests and logos. You had him guilty before
the trial even began...the media made sure of that.
Click to expand...

It wasn't a trial.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
What part? I do not doubt he and his drunken friends were having fun (not rape) at the expense of a teeny-bopper in a bikini. The best thing he could have done was say "I know I did some silly things in my teens, but I do not recall this incident. That doesn't mean it didn't happen and I sincerely apologize to anyone I offended in those days". Democrats wouldn't have forgiven him, but I think the other 70% of Americans would have accepted a Mea Culpa. Instead, I think he lied under oath even though that would be difficult to prove.
Click to expand...

Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge wrote a book about those days and the antics of the group. It was available to read for free in the internet archive during the hearing so I read it. It was a damning portrait of how rich, entitled kids behaved. It doesn't show Kavanaugh in a good light. Strangely enough, Mark Judge refused to answer questions at Kavanaugh's hearing.

Mark-Judge-Internet-Archive-Wasted-800x400.jpg
 
Grajonca said:
It's was a kangaroo court, with the full glare of the sanctimonious media.
Click to expand...

Kangaroo court is right. There was no effort made by the GOP to dig deep into the accusations, it was all a farce.

If I were inocent and in Kavanaugh's position, I wouldn't have been blubbering, sweating and slurping water over the accusations. I'd demand that every single person on Blasey's side be grilled under oath. Instead the FBI chose to disregard most of the people who wanted to come forward for her.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’d like to know how the high priced lawyer became involved! Was it pro bono and him hoping to get fame by bringing down Biden and it just didn’t pan out?

Good Morning, we’re doing Memorial Day today so we can do it outside.
Click to expand...

Hope you have a great Memorial Day.

I have a very low opinion of "celebrity" lawyers...well, most lawyers. :)
 
Nomad said:
What a retard!!!! You claimed the two wiords are interchangeable when they are not.
Skeptical means to have doubts about something. Disputed means one openly denied something.
Click to expand...
you retard part II. they aer close enough in meaning that you have to try to talk down her bests friends skepticism
If she isn't fully disputing it, she sure as hell has "grave doubts" -which would be the best term

You are either a semi-literate dumbass or a craven shill for the right.
I suspect equal measures of both.
Click to expand...
more like you are such a worthless Dem partisan you can't understand Ford was unsupported in her testimony, with skepticism included by her friend.

As far as not being able to back up Ford's claim.... not having seen something with one's own eyes and therefor not being able to confirm or deny it happened, has nothing to do with skepticism or denial.
Click to expand...
horseshit.
The friend is skeptical without having 1st hand knowledge means just that. This is wrong on your part
I am obviously light years ahead of you when it comes to logical, conceptual thinking and comprehension.
Click to expand...
your logic is as bad as your inability to support your contention that no one disputed Fords claims

More lying Trumptard bullshit.
Click to expand...
more garbage posts from yourself

Just because your scumbag ilk intentionally mischaracterize and twist the meanings of everything said by those who don't lick Trump's boots along side you, says nothing about us.
Click to expand...
ROFL. the usual crap rant.
You are incapable of posting anything but rants

Your rank, blatant dishonesty does not make us guilty of hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
"believe"!! HA HA HA HA -you fucking dullard
 
christiefan915 said:
Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge wrote a book about those days and the antics of the group. It was available to read for free in the internet archive during the hearing so I read it. It was a damning portrait of how rich, entitled kids behaved. It doesn't show Kavanaugh in a good light. Strangely enough, Mark Judge refused to answer questions at Kavanaugh's hearing.

https://www.dailydot.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Mark-Judge-Internet-Archive-Wasted-800x400.jpg
Click to expand...

There's no doubt in my mind he was a party animal and lied about it under oath. I know he changed when he got married, but, IMO, it displays a man of weak character who can't fess up to youthful indiscretions. Even if there were crimes committed, and I do not believe any laws were broken except underage drinking, the statute of limitations has long past. So why lie?
 
Nomad said:
For just one moment, look past the accusers in this comparison and look at the accused.

Which one's claims of innocence is more believable.... a career US Senator family man with a devoted wife and kids and a reputation as a decent, sober, solid guy or a young, spoiled rich brat college frat boy with a reputation for excessive drinking?

There is no comparison.

But as for the accusers, when you compare them, it's the same thing again. Reade is a proven liar. Biden staffers from back in the 90's dispute her claims. There is no history of dishonesty in Ford's past. Nobody disputed her claims against Kavanaugh, they just couldn't definitely attest to their accuracy.

Anyone who is anywhere above the level of mindless partisan hack understands all that and anyone with a speck of honesty agrees with it.

Unfortunately, you Trump suckers are too deep in the Trump tank to see reality.

Disgusting hypocrites.
Click to expand...
Don't forget...there were numerous other Kananaugh accusers who were ignored by the FBI because the White House wouldn't allow an investigation.
 
Phantasmal said:
I’d like to know how the high priced lawyer became involved! Was it pro bono and him hoping to get fame by bringing down Biden and it just didn’t pan out?

Good Morning, we’re doing Memorial Day today so we can do it outside.
Click to expand...
His statement was pretty lame. Didn't give a reason for quitting, but just knows that she's not lying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top