Life is Golden
The Sage
Exactly!!!!!he wasn't ALLOWED to have them. Automatic weapons have been banned for years.
Next?
Exactly!!!!!he wasn't ALLOWED to have them. Automatic weapons have been banned for years.
Next?
so you'll just surrender your freedom and submit? if that works for you, great. is there some 'right' of yours that you would never surrender? like your right to free speech? would you retain that?
Nobody wants to discuss if he should have been allowed access to these weapons or not?
he wasn't ALLOWED to have them. Automatic weapons have been banned for years.
Next?
Well, do we all agree then that he should not of been allowed to have this weapon? I think that’s the preliminary questions.
If we all agree then, what steps should or can be taken to prevent something like this from getting such a weapon?
it is already illegal to possess automatic weapons, so what is Gayrod getting at?
False equivalence, an auto's purpose by design isn't to kill other people, can't say the same for a gun
who uses legal automatic weapons in this country today? who is the largest customer of automatic weapons?
Reports this morning say he was a pilot and owned two airplanes.
Would you rather he crashed a plane into the crowd?
We don’t know how he obtained it yet. In your zealotry to ban guns you aren’t waiting for all the facts.
I also think it is closer than 2 blocks, he was across the street and the cops are saying it was 300 yards. 1 football field is not far.
I think it's more than the NRA, but the NRA is part of it.
In America, it's a weird mix of gun worship & a warped desire for any kind of fame. I genuinely don't know how you prevent tragedies like this, but it sure would be nice if people didn't have the kind of weaponry that is needed to cause such a toll. I'll never oppose someone's right to own a gun, but not guns like these.
Again - not sure how he got them. If these weapons were against the law, then we should take a closer look at the enforcement of that law.

Seriously? This is your argument?
Different topic, but Cops don't carry guns to kill people, and please, don't bring up cop shootings, those incidents amount to a extremely small percentage of what the overwhelming majority of cops do in their daily duties
NRA is part of the problem, big part, they feed the gun worship
You address the problem by talking about it, now any serious attempt to begin a discussion is automatically killed by such as the NRA
If you accept the Second Amendment, which I think is as relevant as the Third Amendmemt, you begin with the easy access, if one can own a gun the Amendment doesn't say you can own any kind of gun manufactured, even Scalise agreed, no right is absolute
The bolded is just wrong - like so much of what you say.
As I said before - when I wasn't 'calling' for anything - if it was illegal, we need to talk about enforcement of that law.
You lose. Again.
Tell me how you enforce an existing law, when someone with a home machine shop can make the modification?
Nobody wants to discuss if he should have been allowed access to these weapons or not?
I agree we will lose, if newton wasn’t able to cause change no way this well. That doesn’t make it right.
And yet it's happening.
It would seem that left's opposition to firearms in not the number of deaths, but instead the time frame they occur within; because more people are killed by cars, every year, then killed by firearms and if this was truly about the number of deaths, they would be outcries wanting to hold car manufactures responsible.
Speeding is ILLEGAL and our governments make an effort to control it. Automobiles are strictly regulated. If a person speeds to much too often he will lose his right to drive.