killed 50 from two blocks away from the 32nd floor....

Damocles said:
Or even just right across the street. You must know that any good attorney would kill you on cross if you were this inaccurate.
Click to expand...

I’m not in a courtroom here, and jurors generally see the difference between relevant v non- relevant. I remember once when I Called a particular piece of metal “steel” When it was really An amagulmation. The other attorney made a huge deal out of it, after the trial was over one of the jurors told me how annoying it was When he did that, I won that trial.
 
NOVA said:
And you, if that is true, being as stupid as you are, think, because he didn't have a valid licence, he wouldn't dare fly an airplane.....

are you fuckin' serious ?
Click to expand...

I’m simply pointing out that because cars are dangerous we have lotsOf regulations relating to them. We have strict limitations on what type of vehicle you can use in public and who can use them. While people still die in automobile related injuries, many less die because of those regulations.
 
so everything im hearing says this gun was already illegal. So the guy was already breaking the law to get it meaning he didnt care about any laws you put up.

I could be wrong so if anyone has a source saying the gun was acquired legally link plz.
 
Jarod said:
I’m not in a courtroom here, and jurors generally see the difference between relevant v non- relevant. I remember once when I Called a particular piece of metal “steel” When it was really An amagulmation. The other attorney made a huge deal out of it, after the trial was over one of the jurors told me how annoying it was When he did that, I won that trial.
Click to expand...

Anyway, I just kind of expect more from people who are paid to argue.
 
Jarod said:
I’m not in a courtroom here, and jurors generally see the difference between relevant v non- relevant. I remember once when I Called a particular piece of metal “steel” When it was really An amagulmation. The other attorney made a huge deal out of it, after the trial was over one of the jurors told me how annoying it was When he did that, I won that trial.
Click to expand...

Prove it. :D
 
Jarod said:
I’m simply pointing out that because cars are dangerous we have lotsOf regulations relating to them. We have strict limitations on what type of vehicle you can use in public and who can use them. While people still die in automobile related injuries, many less die because of those regulations.
Click to expand...

Which still doesn't address the FACT that more people die, because of cars, then they do by firearms.
 
Jarod said:
I’m simply pointing out that because cars are dangerous we have lotsOf regulations relating to them. We have strict limitations on what type of vehicle you can use in public and who can use them. While people still die in automobile related injuries, many less die because of those regulations.
Click to expand...
Driving cars is NOT a Constitutional right.....owning a gun is.....self defense is....as is free speech

Rioting, looting, arson and destruction of property isn't a constitutional right...yet the left gets away with it all that on a regular basis.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top