killed 50 from two blocks away from the 32nd floor....

[Cancel 2020.1]

I mean, what a complete effing moron.

 

[canceled.2021.3]

Why do you always fabricate what people claim & say?

It makes you sound exceedingly dopey.

Not fabricating anything. Watching you call for the banning of the type of weapon he used. As I said if was a true automatic weapon then they are already banned.

And I maintain that if it is discovered this guy did this in the name of islum (and I am not saying he did) you and your ilk will stop talking about this like you did when you learned it was a Bernie supporter that shot republican congressman.

Don’t be angry because I know you better than you know yourself

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Different topic, but Cops don't carry guns to kill people, and please, don't bring up cop shootings, those incidents amount to a extremely small percentage of what the overwhelming majority of cops do in their daily duties

this isn't about cop shootings, this is about the purpose of guns. you said a guns only purpose is to kill, so a cops job must be to kill. But then you say cops don't carry guns to kill people, so you see the confusion? what, exactly, is the purpose of a gun?

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Not fabricating anything. Watching you call for the banning of the type of weapon he used. As I said if was a true automatic weapon then they are already banned.

And I maintain that if it is discovered this guy did this in the name of islum (and I am not saying he did) you and your ilk will stop talking about this like you did when you learned it was a Bernie supporter that shot republican congressman.

Don’t be angry because I know you better than you know yourself

You always fabricate what people say. On any major issue, you get in this sort of frantic mode, where it's reduced to the most basic instinct: "Defend Trump! Defend guns!" You're like a child.

I didn't "call for" anything but discussion, and I said I didn't know the circumstances of how he obtained the weapon. I tried to approach this issue honestly; I even said it wasn't all about the guns & NRA.

But dopey knee-jerkers like you go out of your way to prevent an honest discussion on the topic. Partisan hacks like you who don't think keep us from moving forward. Asking for an honest conversation is not unreasonable.

Now, go back your ignorance & desperation.

 

[canceled.2021.3]

You always fabricate what people say. On any major issue, you get in this sort of frantic mode, where it's reduced to the most basic instinct: "Defend Trump! Defend guns!" You're like a child.

I didn't "call for" anything but discussion, and I said I didn't know the circumstances of how he obtained the weapon. I tried to approach this issue honestly; I even said it wasn't all about the guns & NRA.

But dopey knee-jerkers like you go out of your way to prevent an honest discussion on the topic. Partisan hacks like you who don't think keep us from moving forward. Asking for an honest conversation is not unreasonable.

Now, go back your ignorance & desperation.

You don’t want an honest conversation. You just want people to agree with you.

Yes like you have wanted an “honest” conversation about Trump or guns for that matter

The fact remains that if he used an automatic weapon they are illegal. End of story. Nothing to discuss.

Now if it is learned that he is a muslime it bet you won’t call for an “honest conversation about islum”

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

You don’t want an honest conversation. You just want people to agree with you.

Yes like you have wanted an “honest” conversation about Trump or guns for that matter

The fact remains that if he used an automatic weapon they are illegal. End of story. Nothing to discuss.

Now if it is learned that he is a muslime it bet you won’t call for an “honest conversation about islum”

The bolded is just wrong - like so much of what you say.

As I said before - when I wasn't 'calling' for anything - if it was illegal, we need to talk about enforcement of that law.

You lose. Again.

 

[canceled.2021.3]

The bolded is just wrong - like so much of what you say.

As I said before - when I wasn't 'calling' for anything - if it was illegal, we need to talk about enforcement of that law.

You lose. Again.

Great. Automatic weapons are illegal. Now how do you propose we enforce people not owning them?

You are so fucking smart tell us.

Do we develop automatic weapon indentification technology?

Do we conduct random searches of every citizens house to see if they have an automatic weapon?

Or maybe just gun owners?

Tell us oh brilliant one.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

automatic weapons are not illegal.

 

[Jarod]

Sorry GayRod. I do not accept your straw man argument. I know you like to play lawyer here, but stop it already.

Look, this happens every time there is a shooting. You guys scream and cry, but you know you will lose. If you couldn't get anything after Newtown, what makes you think this will? If you couldn't get anything after Scalise was shot by a Bernie supporter what makes you think this will?


BTW. I don't know if this is true, but if it is, you will stop talking about this in two days

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...tack-says-suspect-converted-islam-months-ago/

I agree we will lose, if newton wasn’t able to cause change no way this well. That doesn’t make it right.

 

[Jarod]

Sorry GayRod. I do not accept your straw man argument. I know you like to play lawyer here, but stop it already.

Look, this happens every time there is a shooting. You guys scream and cry, but you know you will lose. If you couldn't get anything after Newtown, what makes you think this will? If you couldn't get anything after Scalise was shot by a Bernie supporter what makes you think this will?


BTW. I don't know if this is true, but if it is, you will stop talking about this in two days

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...tack-says-suspect-converted-islam-months-ago/

I don’t care if this was Isis or a loan crazed gunman, he still should not of been alloud access to that weapon.

 

[Jarod]

it is already illegal to possess automatic weapons, so what is Gayrod getting at?

False

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I don’t care if this was Isis or a loan crazed gunman, he still should not of been alloud access to that weapon.

other than the obvious hindsight, explain why he should not have been allowed access to that weapon. why should I not be allowed access to that weapon? why should YOU not be allowed access to that weapon?

 

[canceled.2021.3]

automatic weapons are not illegal.

For all intents and purposes they are. It is very difficult to own them.

There is something that doesn’t add up about this shooting. It doesn’t fit any pattern of last attacks.

According to his brother he wasn’t a gun guy. He parked in a corner room with prime spot for days. If they were automatic weapons he went to great expense to get them

 

[Jarod]

Sorry GayRod. I do not accept your straw man argument. I know you like to play lawyer here, but stop it already.

Look, this happens every time there is a shooting. You guys scream and cry, but you know you will lose. If you couldn't get anything after Newtown, what makes you think this will? If you couldn't get anything after Scalise was shot by a Bernie supporter what makes you think this will?


BTW. I don't know if this is true, but if it is, you will stop talking about this in two days

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...tack-says-suspect-converted-islam-months-ago/

I have not made an argument yet.

I agree that my position will lose, its still my position and its still right.

 

[Jarod]

other than the obvious hindsight, explain why he should not have been allowed access to that weapon. why should I not be allowed access to that weapon? why should YOU not be allowed access to that weapon?

The same reason I should not have a nuke in my backyard.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

This whack job killed 50 people from two blocks away and from above down from the 32nd floor...


Can we all agree he should not have had access to a weapon capable causing this carnage?

I know the saying, guns don't kill people, but without access to such a weapon, he would never have been able to pull this off.

nope i don't agree.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I have not made an argument yet.

I agree that my position will lose, its still my position and its still right.

and millions disagree with you. does that still make you right?

 

[Jarod]

Dead is dead, you simpleton. Would you really rather have your kid killed by speeder than a gun loon? THINK

Speeding is ILLEGAL and our governments make an effort to control it. Automobiles are strictly regulated. If a person speeds to much too often he will lose his right to drive.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

I still haven't heard how he got the weapons he used, and I know it's not cool to "politicize" tragedies like this right out of the gate, but this stuff does affect me on a pretty basic level.

I just don't get our gun culture. I don't get why organizations like the NRA have so much political power, and why they oppose measures like the banning assault weapons so fiercely.

guns are the last protection from slavery. it is the protector of the individual. It is how a single person wields their power. You, as a serf, look to others to protect you and feed you and coddle you. If you believe you are a truly free individual though, guns are necessary to protect your autonomy.

 

[Jarod]

Every day 100 people are killed on our highways by the pedalphiles and textdrivers and other highway crazies. And we could easily stop that carnage but liberals say hell with it. Why do you liberals let the auto industry sell cars that do 120 mph?

Auto's are strictly regulated, they are required to have all kinds of safety equipment and many types of cars are BANNED from being driven on public roads. Rarely can a car kill 50 people even if you try.