It's ILLEGAL to shoot GAME in several states with an ASSAULT weapon.

Still waiting to see that fascism you’re talking about. Any visits from jack-booted thugs? Are you actually having ANYTHING dictated to you? Do you honestly see any evidence of hitler’s or Mussolini’s regimes here? Stop using that word, it makes you look stupid


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Many definitions FASCISM BUT core tenets...

Fascism is a complex ideology. There are many definitions of fascism; some people describe it as a type or set of political actions, a political philosophy or a mass movement. Most definitions agree that fascism is authoritarian and promotes nationalism at all costs, but its basic characteristics are a matter of debate.

The core principle — what Paxton (Social Science PROF Emeritus) defined as fascism's only definition of morality — is to make the nation stronger, more powerful, larger and more successful. Since fascists see national strength as the only thing that makes a nation "good," fascists will use any means necessary to achieve that goal.

(Yep, sounds familiar)...

"a form of political practice distinctive to the 20th century that arouses popular enthusiasm by sophisticated propaganda techniques for an anti-liberal, anti-socialist, violently exclusionary, expansionist nationalist agenda."


"What Is Fascism?" According to Paxton, these regimes excel at propaganda and make use of grand gestures, such as parades and leaders' dramatic entrances. Fascists scapegoat and demonize other groups, though those groups differ by country and time.

(SCARY PART)

As a result, fascists aim to use the country's assets to increase the country's strength. This leads to a nationalization of assets, Montague (Australian writer/scholar on post war Fascism) said, and in this, fascism resembles Marxism.


Paxton, author of several books, including "The Anatomy of Fascism" (Vintage, 2005), said fascism is based more on feelings than philosophical ideas. In his 1988 essay "The Five Stages of Fascism," published in 1998 in the Journal of Modern History, he defined seven feelings that act as "mobilizing passions" for fascist regimes. They are:


-The primacy of the group. Supporting the group feels more important than maintaining either individual or universal rights.
Believing that one's group is a victim. This justifies any behavior against the group's enemies.


-The belief that individualism and liberalism enable dangerous decadence and have a negative effect on the group.


-A strong sense of community or brotherhood. This brotherhood's "unity and purity are forged by common conviction, if possible, or by exclusionary violence if necessary."


-Individual self-esteem is tied up in the grandeur of the group. Paxton called this an "enhanced sense of identity and belonging."


-Extreme support of a "natural" leader, who is always male. This results in one man taking on the role of national savior.


-"The beauty of violence and of will, when they are devoted to the group's success in a Darwinian struggle," Paxton wrote. The idea of a naturally superior group or, especially in Hitler's case, biological racism, fits into a fascist interpretation of Darwinism.


 
AND even with these?

blaze_ll.jpg



Of course now this guy was a consummate hunter and NRA stalwart...

gun%20presentation.jpg


DUCK IT'S DICK!

Yea there are a lot of “gun enthusiasts” who don’t know shit about hunting that cause a lot of tragedies. Knowing how to shoot is just one small part of hunting. Most of it is understanding geography, habitat, animal behavior and tracking and if you don’t spend a lot of time tramping around and mastering those skill what gun you have and how well you shoot doesn’t mean squat.

In fact if you don’t learn those skills of hunting you’re more of a menace than anything,
 
Yea there are a lot of “gun enthusiasts” who don’t know shit about hunting that cause a lot of tragedies. Knowing how to shoot is just one small part of hunting. Most of it is understanding geography, habitat, animal behavior and tracking and if you don’t spend a lot of time tramping around and mastering those skill what gun you have and how well you shoot doesn’t mean squat.

In fact if you don’t learn those skills of hunting you’re more of a menace than anything,

You know when a 'duffer' goes out on a golf course, especially the 'occasional' player, NO ONE gets killed.
 
Those rights are enshrined in the US Constitution and its Second Amendment.

Keep your grimy, Fascist hands off our Constitution and its Second Amendment.

Constitution can be changed,the 2nd amendment is outdated,has to go!
We're coming for your guns!
 
I see Trump ignoring the Constitution,and that Congress is a equal partner.The boots will come if he is reelected

Specifics. Give me specifics and as a registered republican and conservative, I'll write a letter to go-nadler demanding impeachment. The reality is, if Trump wants to flush a toilet in the white house, one of your jackasses yells "unconstitutional!!" and files a lawsuit(usually with the 9th circus, or some other equally ludicrous jurisdiction) it's a knee-jerk reaction meant to overwhelm you sheep with the notion that he is lawless. You should recognize this, it's kinda what hitler did when he blamed the Jews for Germany's problems
 
Who cares? There is no part of the 2nd Amendment that says it is about hunting. It's a right to own and bear arms, not a "hunting" privilege.

Precisely this. The 2nd amendment has nothing (say it in your best Shultz voice), nothing!!!! to do with hunting.
 
Anyone who needs a 30-round ammo clip to hunt deer is obviously a terrible shot, and needs to spend much time on the target shooting range before progressing to the skilled sport of hunting.

Anyone who is shooting at ducks and quail with an AK-47 needs to be punched in the mouth and have their guns taken away.

I couldn’t agree with this more (well, I wouldn’t actually condone punching someone in the mouth) ... given that the person in the first line actually uses more that 1 or 2 shots of his 30 rounds.
 
Then QUIT USING HUNTING as 'THE' rationale. The NRA builds it's business around it. This is just one random google search just today for the NRA. Notice how many times HUNTING is used--on the FRONT page. (Of course they are throwing in 'conservation' which my friends and FAMILY of gun enthusiasts of old were the 'original' conservationists). None owned a military assault weapon.

https://www.nraila.org/campaigns/huntingconservation/hunting-home-page/

I’m guessing you are implying that the NRA shouldn’t have anything to do with hunting? Or shouldn’t have anything to do with guns? Confusing. The NRA promotes shooting and guns. When you join (and I strongly recommend people join) you are given the opportunity to select one of two magazines with your membership. Either American Hunter for those gun owners who like to hunt (not all for) or American Rifleman] for gun owners who like to collect guns. I like both. The NRA teaches classes all over the US on gun safety, hunting skill and conservation, self defense and a number of other topics. It’s a great organization whose members are gun owners. They own them for various reasons. As a result the organization promotes the expansion all sorts of things including hunting. Just makes sense for them to do so.

As a side note, I frequently order gun parts and other implements from MidwayUSA. I participate in their “round up” program where they round your order price up to the next dollar and donate that to the NRA. I ordered a new clip (actually magazine but...) this morning for the gun I carry concealed at work. I noticed the “round up” program has donated over $16,000,000 to the NRA. :good4u:
 
That second amendment is out dated and needs changed or deleted.
The founding fathers made the Constitution so it could be changed!

Proffer an Amendment then. My guess, you won't get it past the Legislative requirement. The US has a limited power government, and it will stay that way.
 
to own and bear arms in a well regulated militia

nice cherry picking pilgrim

It doesn't say "in a well regulated militia" it says: Because the government can call up a militia, the citizens can own arms to protect themselves from it. The first part is the reason for the right, not a description where you can use the weapon.

If you want that to change you'll need to submit and pass an Amendment. Otherwise we'll maintain our right to keep and bear arms, even if you don't like it.
 
Constitution can be changed,the 2nd amendment is outdated,has to go!
We're coming for your guns!

That's hilarious! Do you have a gun? Do you even know how to operate a firearm? That might be good information to have if you're coming to take people's guns. If you need a primer on how to be successful in your endeavor, you should research the gestapo, the KGB, OVRA, the Stasi, the Tonton Macoute, and all the other regimes that have employed armed secret police forces to eliminate threats to charismatic leaders(including private ownership of firearms). They were successful too! Only one problem, they were all fascists or socialists(not a lot of differences in their behavior, frankly)
 
It's unlawful in Ohio to hunt for anything with any type of high powered rifle. For @#$&%¥ good reasons too. €£¥§ our body count during Deer season is bad enough with just Primitive Weapons! LOL It's not ironic in the least. The prohibition in our State on using high powered rifles for hunting is due to population density and safety concerns.

Does it violate the 2nd amendment? Not at all.

Ugh. We know what you mean. Where my in-laws live in Kentucky one is allowed to hunt with a high powered rifle. Scares me to death. I’m not used to seeing houses when I hunt. I’m not used to seeing houses when I pee off the front porch. Got the opportunity to hunt there last year and looked into my gun safe. The safest weapon I had besides a shotgun with slugs or one of my smoke poles was a 44 mag. Used it and ... I worked. ;)
 
Just out of curiosity.. which states is it illegal to use an AR-15 to hunt? I know in CO, so long as you don't load more than 3 rounds you could hunt with an AR-15. It's a semi-automatic weapon like any .223 I would normally hunt with, and I would have the same limitation with a different semi-automatic "hunting" rifle as I would with my AR-15 which uses the same ammunition.
 
SS

So if I read this correctly, a NUMBER OF STATES have outlawed the assault rifle for 'game'. Just deer, other game? Of course I guess it wouldn't do much good to shoot a duck or quail with a one these. Kinda defeats the purpose if you want a bird for dinner.

Does ANYONE else find this more than just a little bit ironic? I didn't know this till 2 minutes ago.

Save your keystrokes, yes I K N O W you can't shoot people with them anywhere! But guns are for hunting, yet someone decided THESE guns are stupid to use on game or is it just not 'fair' to shoot an animal with them?


Which AR-15 Can You Hunt With?



hunting-with-ar-15.jpg
The AR-15 is often overlooked as a firearm that can be used for hunting game of all kinds. While there are laws that prohibit hunting with an AR-15 rifle in some states, below are some details about which AR-15 rifles should be used for hunting and where you can use them to hunt.

Know Hunting Laws

First, you should know the laws for hunting deer and other game with specific types of guns and ammunition in each state so that you don’t accidentally break the law when you start hunting. It’s best to look at the states that don’t allow deer hunting with .223 diameter bullet or an AR-15 rifle.

Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Iowa, Massachusetts, Virginia, Ohio, New Jersey, Washington, and West Virginia require larger bullets to be used to hunt game.




https://info.stagarms.com/blog/bid/381895/Which-AR-15-Can-You-Hunt-With



What a DINGBAT. NO GUN IS BANNED...the .223 (5.56mm) ROUND IS BANNED, as not heavy enough. You can use an SKS/AK, M14A1, or any other heavier caliber semi-auto "scary looking" rifles, called "assault rifles" by the LEFTIDIOT DUNCES who are CLUELESS, and DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT AN "ASSAULT RIFLE" is CAPABLE OF FULLY AUTOMATIC FIRE.


SEMI-AUTOS all WORK THE SAME WAY, regardless of APPEARANCE, which eludes the LEFT-DUNCES.


THIS (arguable the greatest squirrel rifle of all time) is a SEMI-AUTO:


70620_60_Right.png




FIRES THE SAME WAY AS THIS:



93836.jpg




And THIS is MORE POWERFUL THAN EITHER OF THESE, BY FAR ^^^^^AND IS ALSO SEMI-AUTO:


wm_12909138.jpg




NOTHING FUNNIER THAN LEFTISTS PRETENDIING TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE of.....ANYTHING...
:laugh:
 
Last edited:
It's unlawful in Ohio to hunt for anything with any type of high powered rifle. For damned good reasons too. Hell our body count during Deer season is bad enough with just Primitive Weapons! LOL It's not ironic in the least. The prohibition in our State on using high powered rifles for hunting is due to population density and safety concerns.

Does it violate the 2nd amendment? Not at all.

Um...

You can hunt with rifles in Ohio.

http://wildlife.ohiodnr.gov/hunting...pping-regulations/allowable-hunting-equipment

Straight-walled cartridge rifles in the following calibers: All straight-walled cartridge calibers from a minimum of .357 to a maximum of .50. Shotguns and straight-walled cartridge rifles can be loaded with no more than three shells in the chamber and magazine combined.

And there is no limitation against my AR-15, only the same limitation CO has. 3 rounds. Well, that and the larger animals require a more powerful round than a .223 or 5.56... in states where it is illegal it is because the round is not powerful enough to drop a 100 pound doe in one round.
 
Last edited:
Why? Because you say so? How is it outdated?

It exists to prevent Government tyranny. If you like tyranny, then you would love to see Americans disarmed. Thankfully, not all Americans are as dumb and as uneducated as you appear to be.

Like I told you, in another thread this person would tell you that they are "liberal" and "don't trust government", yet they still want the same people they call "jack booted thugs" when they kill somebody to be the only people legally armed. It isn't about logic, it isn't about how they don't "trust the man", it is solely about control.
 
What a DINGBAT. NO GUN IS BANNED...the .223 (5.56mm) ROUND IS BANNED, as not heavy enough. You can use an SKS/AK, M14A1, or any other heavier caliber semi-auto "scary looking" rifles, called "assault rifles" by the LEFTIDIOT DUNCES who are CLUELESS, and DO NOT UNDERSTAND THAT AN "ASSAULT RIFLE" is CAPABLE OF FULLY AUTOMATIC FIRE.


SEMI-AUTOS all WORK THE SAME WAY, regardless of APPEARANCE, which eludes the LEFT-DUNCES.


THIS (arguable the greatest squirrel rifle of all time) is a SEMI-AUTO:


70620_60_Right.png




FIRES THE SAME WAY AS THIS:



93836.jpg




And THIS is MORE POWERFUL THAN EITHER OF THESE, BY FAR ^^^^^AND IS ALSO SEMI-AUTO:


wm_12909138.jpg




JOTHING FUNNIER THAN LEFTISTS PRETENDIING TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE of.....ANYTHING...
:laugh:

The laughable “technical knowledge” you present is absurd. If first two “fire the same” why is the second one the platform of choice for cops as well as these mass shooters?

Quit trying to bullshit us by presenting them as equal weapons, asswipe.
 
Back
Top