Is Trump being baited, again?

it's an "unholy" investigation.. lol

so where does his authority come from? it comes from the Rosenstein charter, and the powers delegated from the DoJ to an SC.

He has the power to issue a subpoena to try to compel President Trump's testimony,
for example and it requires no other source. Once again I have to try to decipher your meanings
I said a while back that he should have sacked Rosenstein.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
 
There is a reason this investigation is being done. It is no witch hunt. It is the right of the American People to know the truth and to see justice done.

If that means the President needs to have his campaign and his life investigated, (and that is very shameful for our nation,) then that is what must happen.

No man is above the law.

The President could have remained a private citizen. He chose to become a public official. He now answers to We the People. If he had dubious dealings in his background he never should have sought the Presidency.

It is widely understood that he only ran for the office as a way to get free publicity for his name because he uses his name to make money. Looks like he let it go to his head and began to believe he could be a good president despite his questionable past. If he truly wanted America to believe in him he should have released his taxes like he said he was going to do. And he should never have promoted the birther absurdity.

Trump supporters may turn out to be the gullible ones in the end.

So many are so far gone for this guy they probably won't believe it even if Trump is found guilty of money laundering, receiving extortion money, and obstruction of Justice. And if he is removed from office on those grounds, these people will claim it is a partisan over reach even if Republicans join the vote to remove him.

There are some who are so dedicated to Trump they will deny any reality which says Trump is dirty, look for any explanation of why he isn't, and believe anything Trump says, even if he is contradicting himself.

Officers could be frog-marching Trump out of court in hand cuffs, on their way to federal prison after numerous guilty verdicts, with Trump yelling: "What about Hillary's emails?" and his supporters would still be listening to him and believing every word.

If justice prevails, Bernie Madoff could get a new cell mate and America could put this destructive obsession with Donald Trump behind us.

It is limiting for our nation to have every news cycle dominated by this bitter bitter man.

He is so wrong for our nation the only way he could ever win the Presidency would be if he got help from Russian interference in our election.
 
I said a while back that he should have sacked Rosenstein.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 using Tapatalk
the Swamp would go into full throated apoplexy.
The idea is -SINCE THERE IS NO RUSSIAN COLLUSION_ not to take a political hit by firings -justified or not.
Wait it out. MoveOn.

Plus who replaces him? more Swamp characters? Since Sessions is basically AWOL due to his recusal.

That's why Trump is pissed off. All this unfounded/fake BULLSHIT takes a political toll-
but trying to untangle this unholy mess also results in screams of "obstruction"
 
it's an "unholy" investigation.. lol

so where does his authority come from?
it comes from the Rosenstein charter, and the powers delegated from the DoJ to an SC.

He has the power to issue a subpoena to try to compel President Trump's testimony,
for example and it requires no other source. Once again I have to try to decipher your meanings

Mueller has no power to issue subpoena's, he can request the Grand Jury do so, they have the power to do it, Mueller does not.
 
prosecutors by their nature use search. Cops can investigate without probable cause - but refer any criminal investigation for charges to a prosecutor.

There was no law enforcement impetus for Mueller,and Mueller is using powers of subpoena ( search) -
hence his investigation is unconstituitonal; based on unnamed/un-referenced "Russian collusion"

The hole matter is a political fishing expedition, and Mueller is unchecked even from there

Prosecutors do not have subpoena power, they are part of the executive branch and have no authority until the judicial branch gives it.
 
No wonder you people are Republicans you lack a basic understanding of how our government works under the Constitution.
 
Mueller has no power to issue subpoena's, he can request the Grand Jury do so, they have the power to do it, Mueller does not.

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/18/what-the-special-counsel-can-and-cant-do-with-his-investigation.html
In his new job, Mueller and his staff can interview witnesses,subpoena documents and, if the evidence merits, work with the bureau to bring criminal charges.

8 CFR Part 600 - GENERAL POWERS OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/part-600
...
Subject to the limitations in the following paragraphs, the Special Counsel shall exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.
 
...
Subject to the limitations in the following paragraphs, the Special Counsel shall exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.

CNBC is WRONG, Mueller can ask a grand jury to issue a subpoena.
 
This is an often misunderstood issue here. Mueller has no power to issue subpoena's, only the Judicial branch has that power.

A Grand Jury is a part of the judicial branch and can issue subpoena's and its where Mueller's "power" to subpoena comes from. A Grand Jury can approve or refuse a request for a subpoena.

They will call it Mueller's subpoena if he is the one who requested it, but it comes from the judicial branch as directed by the Constitution.
 
See...

United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. 292 (1991)
United States v. Nixon, 428 U.S. 683 (1974)
 
See...

United States v. R. Enterprises, 498 U.S. 292 (1991)
United States v. Nixon, 428 U.S. 683 (1974)
and this is where you should make your case, instead of us doing it for you.sending me to look for your claims in case law should be your responsibility - not mine.

I don't disagree -but I'm not a lawyer that deals with this daily - hopefully you provide more clarity to your clients
the you routinely do here -which is my beef with you. I write for alliteration/interst, but ALWAYS toward clarity!
++

yes. to your point courts issue subpoenas - but grand juries are rubber stamps -hence
"prosecutors like Mueller can issue subpoenas" is correct in practice, if not true separation of powers
 
and this is where you should make your case, instead of us doing it for you.sending me to look for your claims in case law should be your responsibility - not mine.

I don't disagree -but I'm not a lawyer that deals with this daily - hopefully you provide more clarity to your clients
the you routinely do here -which is my beef with you. I write for alliteration/interst, but ALWAYS toward clarity!
++

yes. to your point courts issue subpoenas - but grand juries are rubber stamps -hence
"prosecutors like Mueller can issue subpoenas" is correct in practice, if not true separation of powers

A Grand Jury has the authority and power to refuse. We use a Grand Jury because they are citizens of our nation. Their subpoena's are reviewable by a Court.
 
When debating if Mueller has the authority to conduct an investigation, we need to discuss where his power comes from.... It is coming from a Grand Jury which is the Constitutional seat of that power.

If a GJ authorizes it, it was Constitutional.

Mueller did no have any authority but to ask, it was their authority that is used to issue it.
There is NO LIMIT to Muellers legal authority to request a Subpoena.
 
So, again, tell me where has Mueller exceeded his authority? What is unconstitutional about Muellers investigation?
 
Back
Top