I'm just not feeling it...

Trump is for reforming immigration in the very same ways clinton, obama, shcumer have all suggested in the past, other than the wall which is a security issue not an immigration one.

Why do you think this? Because he may have said it once at one time?

The only Immigration plan Trump supports is the wall and kicking Muslims out.

He has no Immigration Reform plan.
 
Why do you think this? Because he may have said it once at one time?

The only Immigration plan Trump supports is the wall and kicking Muslims out.

He has no Immigration Reform plan.




Trump wants a merit based system. you need to read more than democrat talking points.



And no, I don't want a private conversation with you. I don't care about your therapist, nor your abusive relationships.
 
In November 2016, shortly after the presidential election, Trump told Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes that his personal view on same-sex marriage was "irrelevant" and that he was "fine with" same-sex marriage, stating that the issue was "settled" in the Obergefell decision.

Who fucking cares what Trump said in November 2016!?!? Why are you still taking the position that he's honest? I don't understand why you are taking him at his word. Are you a fucking idiot?


Give it 5 years or less and that will quietly disappear like it did for the democrats.

It didn't "disappear" for the Democrats. They made marriage equality central to their party platform.

For your "both sides" to work, they could not have done that.

So you failed again using one of the laziest rhetorical tactics ever.

What a fraud.
 
And lets compare that to the excuse making democrats make for Muslims who literally stone gays to death.

WHATABOUT WHATABOUT WHATBOUT BOUT BOUT, WHATABOUT WHATABOUT WHATABOUT BOUT BOUT, WHATABOUT WHATABOUT WHATABOUT BOUT BOUT, WHATABOUT WHATABOUT BOUT BOUT.

Democrats made marriage equality central to their party platform. They didn't "disappear it".

So when you whatabout like that, you end up just showing everyone how weak of an argument you're making.

I don't see Democrats making excuses for Muslims stoning gay people to death, but I do see Conservatives make excuses for gay bashing literally using the "gay panic" defense. And the best example of that is Matthew Shepherd, who was murdered by homophobic white Conservatives because he made a pass at one of them and it made them so emotionally unhinged that they just had to handcuff him to a fencepost and pistolwhip him to death.

SO THERE'S YOUR WHATABOUT. HAPPY WE GOT THERE?
 
It's relevant because I'd rather gays be able to have every right a straight marriage couple has moreso than to excuse the abhorrent treatment of gays in Islam.

So, you're trying to associate Islam to Democrats because...why?

I don't see any Democrats defending the practice of stoning gay people in Muslim countries. In fact, I see Democrats speaking out against it.

In fact, it's your Conservative friends who are literally going over to foreign countries to support and promote anti-gay agendas.

Republicans, on the other hand, are defending murdering gay people here in the US with the "gay panic" defense. The defense that was used by Conservatives in the murder of Matthew Shepherd.

So you're just constructing a straw man around Democrats supporting gay bashing in Islam to balance out the Conservatives who support gay bashing in the US.

What a fucking fraud you are. The more you post, the more convinced I am that you're just a superficial hack who has ego issues.
 
It means while in the past, like democrats were adamantly opposed to gay marriage, will start not commenting on it, stating they support equal rights and "civil unions" then drop it all together. that's progress. Remember, I was for gay marriage, before you.

So you're a fucking liar and an idiot because marriage equality is part of the Democrats platform.

So you're falsely characterizing Democrats' support for marriage equality in order to make your "both sides" argument coherent.

What. A. Fucking. Fraud.
 
"In November 2016, shortly after the presidential election, Trump told Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes that his personal view on same-sex marriage was "irrelevant" and that he was "fine with" same-sex marriage, stating that the issue was "settled" in the Obergefell decision.[78][102]"

LOL!

Donald Trump also said in that interview that no one in his campaign had any contact with Russia.

We know that's a lie. So since he lied about that, why wouldn't he also by lying about his feelings around SSM?
 
And there you go, you are an idiot. Republicans are not nazis. that makes you a mindless tool. You are being gaslighted, but it's by your media and your party that gets you to say such gawd awful stupid shit.

Republicans are most definitely Nazis because Republicans literally nominated Nazis to run as Republicans.

Steve King routinely tweets out Nazi propaganda.

TRUMP tweeted out Nazi propaganda.

If it goose-steps like a Nazi...
 
Republicans are most definitely Nazis because Republicans literally nominated Nazis to run as Republicans.

Steve King routinely tweets out Nazi propaganda.

TRUMP tweeted out Nazi propaganda.

If it goose-steps like a Nazi...

Calling Trump a Nazi, will get you 4 more years of..... TRUMP #MAGA

have you learned nothing
 
Yeah, not watching snotty british guy make an ass of himself for you to jerk off too. sorry.

Just as expected, you don't want to confront your own nature because you're afraid doing so will make you not feel as savvy or smart as you think.

I also provided you with links to NPR and The Atlantic. You're gaslighting sources now because you're afraid of confronting yourself.

So on top of being a fraud you're also a coward.

Nice.
 
FSB? yes I am with the FSB, I've been telling you this, why you no believe me? Are you ok? we talked about this.

You might think you're being funny by trying to deflect but you're not.

You're just telling everyone you're OK with being used by Russians to advance their propaganda because it makes you feel better about yourself.

This is why it's so easy for me to accept that Trump conspired with Russia; look how willing you are to sell your integrity out just to feel better about yourself on an anonymous message board.
 
I say they are the same and differ only slightly.

And you say that because you're lazy. You're too lazy to do the work of making distinctions and differences. Doing that work might upend your conventional wisdom, and that's too scary a prospect for you because you pride yourself on your judgment and instincts, don't you?

Well, so did this fucking idiot:

‘Nothing on this page is real’: How lies become truth in online America
“What she trusted most was her own ability to think critically and discern the truth, and increasingly her instincts aligned with the online community where she spent most of her time.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...1d3RQTcAVq8i-4y1pp7I9w&utm_term=.f058325e4e18

Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Your position wholly informed by the shit you read online that confirms your biases because you're too fucking lazy or stupid to do the work.
 
It's absolutely a choice.

No, it's not!

Not if the choice is not truthfully being informed.

A drug company not getting FDA approval means they can make whatever claim they want about the drug.

That's what that means, idiot.

So they will say "this drug will cue cancer!" And your mother will hear that and because she's desperate, or because you're desperate, you spend whatever savings you have to get the treatment because the drug company said it would work. Then when the treatment doesn't work, you're denied any remedy because you already gave your money over to the drug company who then says "we didn't have to tell the truth, silly moron."

That's what happens with experimental treatments.

It's also what happens on treatments that aren't FDA approved. That's why Dr. Oz got in trouble, moron.
 
Back
Top