I'm just not feeling it...

1. We aren't that close.

I don't need to be close to someone to know when they're bullshitting and posturing.


. if you truly believe that I am engaging it, you are more of a mindless partisan than even I suspect.

You're just a lazy fucking nobody who has a false sense of entitlement that demands accommodation because you want people to think you're more thoughtful than you truly are.
 
Which is exactly what "Both sides" is.

It's you trying to make us question our sanity by employing binary thinking so you can avoid doing the actual work of understanding your position; so we're left with the question of "why are you both siding things?" Since you leave that unspoken, we have to divine your intent that you simply just categorically deny.

So that's gaslighting, asshole.



No, that's not. are you questioning you sanity? How am I trying to question your sanity, Cunt.
 
I don't need to be close to someone to know when they're bullshitting and posturing.




You're just a lazy fucking nobody who has a false sense of entitlement that demands accommodation because you want people to think you're more thoughtful than you truly are.


What am I demanding you accomodate?


I think you see a shrink regularly, don't you. This is why you have this delusion of gaslighting, and use the term. You come from an abusive relationship?
 
No, it is the same shit you engaged in when Obama first took office

????????? WTF???????????


you are delusional to think it's a KGB tactic, where in the world did you read this

Drumpf Embraces One Of Russia's Favorite Propaganda Tactics — Whataboutism
https://www.npr.org/2017/03/17/5204...sias-favorite-propaganda-tactics-whataboutism

The History of Russian Involvement in America's Race Wars
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/russia-facebook-race/542796/

Watch John Oliver Break Down Drumpf’s Three Dangerous Manipulation Tactics

The fact that you're just finding out about this now is troubling for one of two reasons:

1) You have been an unwitting stooge of the FSB this whole time

or

2) You are lying and bullshitting me again
 
if you bitch and moan about trump doing something, but was silent when obama did it,

Right on cue!

"WHATABOUT OBAMA"

What did Obama whatabout?

I think you're just reflexively whatabouting now because you know that I know you're a phony who's phoning this shit in.

Very disappointing.
 
????????? WTF???????????




Drumpf Embraces One Of Russia's Favorite Propaganda Tactics — Whataboutism
https://www.npr.org/2017/03/17/5204...sias-favorite-propaganda-tactics-whataboutism

The History of Russian Involvement in America's Race Wars
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/10/russia-facebook-race/542796/

Watch John Oliver Break Down Drumpf’s Three Dangerous Manipulation Tactics

The fact that you're just finding out about this now is troubling for one of two reasons:

1) You have been an unwitting stooge of the FSB this whole time

or

2) You are lying and bullshitting me again





Yeah, not watching snotty british guy make an ass of himself for you to jerk off too. sorry.


FSB? yes I am with the FSB, I've been telling you this, why you no believe me? Are you ok? we talked about this.
 
When you get all whiney and butthurt at trump for something you had no problem with when your guy did it, makes you a hypocritical dipshit, not a victim of "gaslighting" or "kgb tactics", that just makes you look like an idiot.

What are you talking about? You keep insisting Obama died what Trump did, but you don't provide any specifics.

You're just a fucking fraud.
 
Right on cue!

"WHATABOUT OBAMA"

What did Obama whatabout?

I think you're just reflexively whatabouting now because you know that I know you're a phony who's phoning this shit in.

Very disappointing.




No, I am kgb, I implanted virus in your toaster to make collectivist toast.
 
My ego is huge because I am surrounded by mediocrity, or in your case, mindless incapability.

No, you're delusional.

Remember, this whole thing started because you insisted that Trump's False Hope Bill would provide false hope to terminally ill patients. When I called that out, you sought to try and manipulate me emotionally byu invoking a "what if" scenario right after screeching that it was unfair that I would invoke a "what if". The only argument you could make in favor of that stupid bill (a bill you didn't read and took Trump's comments about at face value, showing your gullibility) was to invoke a "what if" emotional hypothetical.

That's it. You can't come up with a thoughtful reason to support the bill, you immediately went for the emotional rhetorical track. And you fucking failed there because it was precisely the thing you screeched was unfair for me to do literally in the prior post.

Like, no joke...I invoked a "what if" and you said it was unfair, then in the next fucking post, you invoked a "what if" and then stuck to that "what if".

Were you aware of that? Do you even care that you did it?
 
No, you're delusional.

Remember, this whole thing started because you insisted that Trump's False Hope Bill would provide false hope to terminally ill patients. When I called that out, you sought to try and manipulate me emotionally byu invoking a "what if" scenario right after screeching that it was unfair that I would invoke a "what if". The only argument you could make in favor of that stupid bill (a bill you didn't read and took Trump's comments about at face value, showing your gullibility) was to invoke a "what if" emotional hypothetical.

That's it. You can't come up with a thoughtful reason to support the bill, you immediately went for the emotional rhetorical track. And you fucking failed there because it was precisely the thing you screeched was unfair for me to do literally in the prior post.

Like, no joke...I invoked a "what if" and you said it was unfair, then in the next fucking post, you invoked a "what if" and then stuck to that "what if".

Were you aware of that? Do you even care that you did it?




I use kgb to find information on you. look outside, that is comrade sergi, he want to speak to you.
 
I'm smarter

Apparently not.

A smart person wouldn't have tried to manipulate someone to give yourself comfort.

A smart person would have taken the time to thoroughly read and understand the position they're taking.

You only took the position you did because it served the personal narrative you were trying to establish for yourself; that you're a reasonable person solely because you're a binary thinker.
 
Yes, I am trying to question your sanity by disagreeing with you and not being a mindless partisan hack like you..... ooohga booogha!!!!!

You're trying to gaslight me so I won't question the lazy "both siderism" you use as a rhetorical crutch because you're too lazy to do the work.
 
Apparently not.

A smart person wouldn't have tried to manipulate someone to give yourself comfort.

A smart person would have taken the time to thoroughly read and understand the position they're taking.

You only took the position you did because it served the personal narrative you were trying to establish for yourself; that you're a reasonable person solely because you're a binary thinker.





You think republican good, democrat bad.


I say they are the same and differ only slightly.


But I am the binary thinker?


KGB disagrees.
 
Are you that insecure that you think anyone could manipulate you on the internet?

LOL.

You didn't succeed in manipulation.

And internet manipulation works; that's why a Conservative walked into a DC Pizza Shop and shot up the place. It's also why so many people voted for Trump; they were manipulated.

You're trying to manipulate people by preying on their emotions. But you're not thoughtful about that, so it just comes off as phony and insincere.

I refer to my OP...I'm not feeling the sincerity, bruh.
 
LOL.

You didn't succeed in manipulation.

And internet manipulation works; that's why a Conservative walked into a DC Pizza Shop and shot up the place. It's also why so many people voted for Trump; they were manipulated.

You're trying to manipulate people by preying on their emotions. But you're not thoughtful about that, so it just comes off as phony and insincere.

I refer to my OP...I'm not feeling the sincerity, bruh.





KGB says question is begged.


If that is why the pizza shop was shot up, why did a democrat shoot up a republican softball game?
 
I read the fucking bill, dumb dumb. I am for choice. you are not. I would not have a problem with a terminally ill patient, seeking experimental treatment, You would kill your fucking mother.

It's not a choice! It's false hope. If the drug isn't FDA-approved that means that it's not going to work.

It means the drug company knows it won't pass FDA muster.

So rather than write it off, the drug company is seeking to profit off it and they do that with this bill. This bill says to the drug company that you don't have to have your drug approved by the FDA for patients to pay for it. So a drug company will then make wild claims about the effects of the drug, even ignoring, withholding, or obfuscating any negative side effects, because this bill a) shields them from the liability, b) doesn't require them to get the drug approved by the FDA, c) provides no mechanism for oversight when the drug company inevitably lies about the drug's effects and successes.

And the only argument you can make is an emotional "what if" that you had previously said wasn't a fair argument to make.

And you're doing this all so you can prove "both sides" for yourself.

BARF.
 
It's not a choice! It's false hope. If the drug isn't FDA-approved that means that it's not going to work. It means the drug company knows it won't pass FDA muster. So rather than write it off, the drug company is seeking to profit off it and they do that with this bill. This bill says to the drug company, you don't have to have your drug approved by the FDA for patients to pay for it. So a drug company will then make wild claims about the effects of the drug, even ignoring, withholding, or obfuscating any negative side effects, because this bill a) shields them from the liability, b) doesn't require them to get the drug approved by the FDA, c) provides no mechanism for oversight when the drug company inevitably lies about the drug's effects and successes.

And the only argument you cna make is an emotional "what if" that you had previously said wasn't a fair argument to make.

And you're doing this all so you can prove "both sides" for yourself.

BARF.





It's absolutely a choice. Consider the marijuana argument. People think it cures everything, I think they are full of shit, but I also think people should have the choice to use it if they want. IT's the same with these experimental drugs but the stakes are higher. What harm will come to a terminally ill patient, will they die or something?


And why are you pming me?
 
Back
Top