If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Cypress]

I have read it.

Claiming you took the time and effort to read a PhD dissertation in physics from Oxford University is a blatant lie, and it is your pervasive dishonesty that keeps most people from committing to any serious discussion with you.

You didn't even know about the standard model of particle physics:

C

Thread 'The greatest success story in physics'

Mar 28, 2024

Our best explanation of physical reality.

• Cypress

I would offer to answer any questions that you might have about it, but you would neither understand any of the material

That's because you would have to plagiarize or paraphrase what other people have written explaining Hawkins dissertation.

 

[IBDaMann]

Claiming you took the time and effort to read a PhD dissertation in physics from Oxford University is a blatant lie,

... says the guy who thinks engineers use the "standard model of particle physics" to build technology, and not chemistry and physics.

and it is your pervasive dishonesty

You are eternally dishonest and stupid.

 

[Cypress]

... says the guy who thinks engineers use the "standard model of particle physics" to build technology, and not chemistry and physics.


You are eternally dishonest and stupid.

Thanks for tacitly admitting you had never previously heard of one of the most famous theoretical frameworks in the history of science- i.e., the standard model of particle physics.

But then you want me to believe that you took the time and effort to read a 1966 PhD dissertation in physics from Oxford University