If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Into the Night]

They Chose a path,they can walk it

Who are 'they'?? There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist'.

 

[Margot]

I am. Do you know what an atheist is?


What path would that be? I don't recall ever choosing any paths.


He's such an ass.


You might not be able to see me.

The Path you Chose is the path you walk,when you get up each day

 

[Into the Night]

View attachment 67326
That's a question for the Guy with the Sword!

What does a guy with a sword have to do with talking donkeys? YARP

 

[Margot]

Who are 'they'?? There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist'.

Atheist! I didn't mention militant atheist

 

[Into the Night]

The Path you Chose is the path you walk,when you get up each day

Deep...for the shallow end of the pool.

 

[Into the Night]

Atheist! I didn't mention militant atheist

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POST!

 

[Margot]

What does a guy with a sword have to do with talking donkeys? YARP

If you will read Numbers 22 ,you'll find he was there!

 

[Margot]

I don't worship random letters.

Your choice

 

[Margot]

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POST!

Show where I wrote militant

 

[Into the Night]

Random equations mean nothing. Try again.

 

[gmark77]

View attachment 67326
That's a question for the Guy with the Sword!

No, it's a question for you given you are the one telling us about the nature of spirit. So far you've made positive declarations (like that spirit is not held to the laws of physics) which you offer without evidence.

You can't then go hand waving away your inability to support your own claims.

 

[Into the Night]

Good luck being an atheist

You are very nice to wish him luck. He deserves it.

 

[Into the Night]

As this and other threads prove, militant atheists are broken people. Sad.

There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist', Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

The comment I have about a multiverse is that it still doesn't explain a beginning, or the origin of universal mathematical laws of physics. Logic and science suggest there was a beginning, the universes can't be infinitly old.

You are still locked in this paradox. You're gonna have to choose or continue to be irrational.

Neither logic nor science specify a beginning of anything, Clanker.

According to cosmologist David Whittle, the total (positive) mass-energy of the observable universe is estimated at 10 exponent 53 kg.

Argument from randU fallacy. Special pleading fallacy.

The total (negative) gravitational energy of the observable universe is 10 exponent 53 kg

Argument from randU fallacy. Special pleading fallacy.

The sum of positive mass-energy and negative gravitational energy is therefore estimated to be equal to zero.

Argument from randU fallacy. Buzzword fallacy.

This is an extraordinary result.

Random numbers are not a result.

Almost any other result would imply a universe that collapses back on itself in a fraction of a second, or inflates so rapidly that atomic matter doesn't have a chance to form.

Random numbers are not a result.

Of the infinite number of mathematical possibilities for an energy balance in the universe, it seems to be balanced precisely at zero.

What 'energy balance'? Buzzword fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.

We seem to live in a universe that is improbably finely tuned on the razor's edge.

A razor is not a tuner. The universe is not a radio.

 

[Into the Night]

Spirit! Spirit isn't subject to the laws of physics

Why? Does a spirit made of matter? Does a spirit have energy? If it is neither, how do you know it exists?

 

[Into the Night]

Your choice

Yup. My choice. It seems to be your's, however, to worship random letters.

 

[Into the Night]

Show where I wrote militant

DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS! ANYONE CAN READ THEM!

 

[Cypress]

Random equations mean nothing!!

They are not 'random' equations.

They are among the most famous and important equations in the history of science, and instantly recognizable to anyone who had a few semesters of college physics.

It says something about you and your science illiteracy that you didn't recognize them.

 

[IBDaMann]

So you don't have any answer as to why they exist or take the particular form they do.

So, you surrender. I see. You had only one job: provide the logical support for your affirmative assertion that the laws of nature and the god in which you believe necessarily had to migrate from somewhere.

You threw in the towel, in the first round.

According to you,

You don't get to speak for me, especially since you don't understand anything.

they either just randomly popped into existence

You are selecting from the menu of your limited imagination, remember?

, or they exist and persist for no particular reason at all.

This is the argument you are making for the deity you worship, yes? You were supposed to have answered this question but were in the process of surrendering.

You are a bad faith poster

... because it's my fault that you can't support your affirmative assertions.

I'm not going to invest much time in.

i.e. you are going to flee to the hills now.

You insinuated that you supposedly had read Steven Hawking's PhD dissertation,

If I merely insinuated, allow me to correct that. I will explicitly state that I have read it. I would offer to answer any questions that you might have about it, but you would neither understand any of the material nor be able to formulate a coherent question related to the subject matter.

It's not a profitable use of my time to engage with liars.

... which is why you limit your mumbling to yourself.

 

[IBDaMann]

They are not 'random' equations. They are among the most famous and important equations in the history of science,

So is E = MC^2, and it would have been just as unrelated to the question of from where your deity originally migrated, or are you claiming that it "just popped into existence"?