If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[ZenMode]

RQAA. Stop asking the same thing over and over and over and over and over like a moron.

That wasn't a question. It was a statement.

 

[Into the Night]

Old Testament.

Nope. The iron age only covers a small part of the Old Testament.

Gods, if they are described as YOU claim, could prove they exist.

It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Right. Negative proofs don't work.

So why do you keep trying them?

Not by me, but by those who say "prove gods don't exist".

YOU are attempting to prove no god or gods exist!

A comparison isn't a circular argument. Fail.

YARP

 

[ZenMode]

Random equations are not the Universe. The Universe is unorganized.

Stop making shit up.

 

[Into the Night]

Stop making shit up.

You cannot resolve your paradox by denying it.

 

[Monad Portal]

Most events are random. The Universe is unorganized.

Random equations are not the Universe. False equivalence fallacy.

just dumb.

what do you just always be an idiot no matter what?

what the fuck is wrong with you, dumbass?

 

[Into the Night]

That wasn't a question. It was a statement.

Your word games won't work. RQAA.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. The iron age only covers a small part of the Old Testament.

Yes, but the Iron Age-type of man is who wrote the OT. The kind of man who thinks rain is let in through windows in the sky.

It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.

A god could prove it exists.

It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.

I don't need to disprove what has never been proven.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Nope.

So why do you keep trying them?

There's no trying.

YOU are attempting to prove no god or gods exist!

That which can be claimed without sufficient evidence can be dismissed without evidence

YARP

 

[ZenMode]

You cannot resolve your paradox by denying it.

You can create a paradox just by claiming it.

 

[Monad Portal]

You cannot resolve your paradox by denying it.

dumbest shit ever, fuckface.

 

[IBDaMann]

[irrelevant equations omitted]

You haven't shown that the universe somehow fails the Chi‑Square Test, Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test, Frequency / Equidistribution Test, Serial Test, Gap Test, Poker Test, Coupon Collector’s Test, Permutation Test, Runs Test, Serial Correlation Test, Maximum‑of‑t Test or the Collision Test.

Show that the universe distribution fails just one test and I'll concede your point.

 

[IBDaMann]

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Where is your extraordinary evidence for Global Warming? Oh, that's right, you haven't even gotten your definition yet.

I'm not falling for "you can't prove it doesn't exist" schtick.

It's everyone else that isn't falling for your inability to prove it doesn't exist.

If that worked, we should all believe in Russell's Teapot.

Nope. Any person affirmatively asserting Russell's teapot bears the full burden to support the claim. Anyone affirmatively asserting no Russell's teapot bears the full burden to support the claim. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

I wanna see my pool guy part the waters with a pool brush.

How deeply?

 

[Cypress]

ftfy

The fact that matter, space, and energy are predictable and their behaviors conform to precise mathematical principles, means your claim that the universe is supposedly totally disorganized and purely random does not pass the laugh test.

 

[Monad Portal]

ftfy

The fact that matter, space, and energy are predictable and their behaviors conform to precise mathematical principles, means your claim that the universe is supposedly totally disorganized and purely random does not pass the laugh test.

no.

you're dumb and gay

 

[ZenMode]

Your word games won't work. RQAA.

Your lack of a basic grasp of punctuation won't work.

 

[ZenMode]

You cannot resolve your paradox by denying it.

You can't create a non-existence paradox by claiming it.

 

[ZenMode]

Nope. The iron age only covers a small part of the Old Testament.

Iron rage is a general reference to a period in history when man was lacking much information about the world around him and created God's accordingly.

It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.

And God, as you described it, could prove itself.

It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.

I don't need to prove God's don't exist anymore than I need to prove astrology is fake.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Wrong.

So why do you keep trying them?

Lies.

YOU are attempting to prove no god or gods exist!

I don't need to disprove what has never been proven.

YARP

 

[IBDaMann]

Don't get angry with me just because you don't know of what thou speaketh.

The fact that matter, space, and energy are predictable

Nope. This does not make the universe predictable or the distribution ordered somehow. Poker has rules also, but you cannot predict what hand you will get.

and their behaviors conform to precise mathematical principles,

You insist on conflating separate and distinct mathematical concepts, in order to protect your fragile religious beliefs.

... means your claim that the universe is supposedly totally disorganized and purely random does not pass the laugh test.

Does it matter if the guy laughing never paid attention in school, is scientifically illiterate, and is banging his head on the padded walls of his cell?

 

[IBDaMann]

I don't need to disprove what has never been proven.

You need to prove what you affirmatively assert, and if you affirmatively assert the negation of another theory, you need to prove that.

 

[Monad Portal]

You can't create a non-existence paradox by claiming it.

he thinks he can.

and he doesn't know what a paradox is.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, but the Iron Age-type of man is who wrote the OT.

Nope. The Old Testament began long before the iron age.

The kind of man who thinks rain is let in through windows in the sky.

No such description in the Bible. You are still deluded.

A god could prove it exists.

It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.
Attempted negative proof fallacy.

I don't need to disprove what has never been proven.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Nope.

There's no trying.

That which can be claimed without sufficient evidence can be dismissed without evidence

Attempted negative proof fallacy. You cannot make any evidence just disappear. Evidence is not quantity.

Your word games won't work.