If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

Everyday-Equation.jpg
Random equations are not the Universe, Clanker. The Universe is unorganized.
 
So, as expected no explanation given for the cause of the lawful organization of the cosmos.

The big bang, mathematical rationality, and fine tuning are independent events and observations that in principle could have arisen for reasons independent of each other.
Annnnnnnnd back to your chanting of random words. No apparent coherency.
 
Correct and those claiming gods exist, based on nothing but iron age stories,
What is an 'iron age story'??
haven't come close to meeting the burden of proof.
It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.
Me saying "gods don't exist" is just another way of saying "Those who believe in gods haven't proven they exist".

The burden on me isn't to prove gods don't exist. If 'negative proofs' were how we operate, then it would be on you, or anyone else, to prove there isn't a island of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and we'd all just have to believe that such an island exists, since none of us is able to prove every square miles of the Atlantic Ocean isn't inhabited by magical rainbow unicorns.
Attempted negative proof fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
 
Explain exactly why matter and energy would move, behave, and interact according to precise mathematical principles, and what exactly caused that to happen.

p.s. Just throwing your hands up in the air and blurting out "well, that's just the way it is!" is not an intellectually adequate or satisfying answer.
False equivalence fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics). The Universe is unorganized.
 
I almost exclusively have said the universe is mathematically rational and lawfully organized. I've tried to steer clear for the most part saying that it's designed.
Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics). The Universe is unorganized.
That's not an explanation for why inert and inanimate matter and would behave and interact according to very precise mathematical principles. You can't just sweep that under the rug.
The Universe is not mathematics or random equations.
Leaving aside the question of why matter and energy even exists in the first place, why wouldn't matter and energy just behave chaotically and unpredictably? You would never expect random chance and irrational and inanimate causes to imbue precise organization and rational mathematical principles on a system.
The Universe is not mathematics or random equations. The Universe is unorganized.
 
^^^ Translation: there is no explanation for the cause of a mathematically rational and lawfully organized universe. But somehow, atheists believe it is certain there in no rational agency involved or underlying it all

This worldview of "I don't know" on the one hand, followed up by "I am certain" on the other hand is pure cognitive dissonance and mental confusion.
Attempted proof by circular. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics).
 
You said that gods are fictional.

That is an assertion.

ANYONE making an assertion assumes the burden of proof for the assertion.

You seem unable to do that...so you are diverting.

That is what many atheists do.
no.

an assertion can stand proven or unproven.

if you want to disprove an assertion you must disprove it.
 
What is an 'iron age story'??
Old Testament.
It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
Gods, if they are described as YOU claim, could prove they exist.
It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.
Right. Negative proofs don't work.
Attempted negative proof fallacy.
Not by me, but by those who say "prove gods don't exist".
Attempted negative proof fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
A comparison isn't a circular argument. Fail.
 
Back
Top