He is not an atheist.You said that gods are fictional.
That is an assertion.
ANYONE making an assertion assumes the burden of proof for the assertion.
You seem unable to do that...so you are diverting.
That is what many atheists do.
He is not an atheist.You said that gods are fictional.
That is an assertion.
ANYONE making an assertion assumes the burden of proof for the assertion.
You seem unable to do that...so you are diverting.
That is what many atheists do.
Random equations are not the Universe, Clanker. The Universe is unorganized.
Annnnnnnnd back to your chanting of random words. No apparent coherency.So, as expected no explanation given for the cause of the lawful organization of the cosmos.
The big bang, mathematical rationality, and fine tuning are independent events and observations that in principle could have arisen for reasons independent of each other.
Mathematics was created by Man, Clanker.Provide the exact quote where I said exactly that.
I think it's possible that the mathematical laws of physics have an independent existence in some platonic sense.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!Post the exact quote where I said exactly what you claimed I said.
DON'T TRY TO DENY YOUR OWN POSTS!^^ Unable to provide the quote that would prove his claim.
What is an 'iron age story'??Correct and those claiming gods exist, based on nothing but iron age stories,
It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.haven't come close to meeting the burden of proof.
Attempted negative proof fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).Me saying "gods don't exist" is just another way of saying "Those who believe in gods haven't proven they exist".
The burden on me isn't to prove gods don't exist. If 'negative proofs' were how we operate, then it would be on you, or anyone else, to prove there isn't a island of magical rainbow unicorns in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean and we'd all just have to believe that such an island exists, since none of us is able to prove every square miles of the Atlantic Ocean isn't inhabited by magical rainbow unicorns.
False equivalence fallacy. Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics). The Universe is unorganized.Explain exactly why matter and energy would move, behave, and interact according to precise mathematical principles, and what exactly caused that to happen.
p.s. Just throwing your hands up in the air and blurting out "well, that's just the way it is!" is not an intellectually adequate or satisfying answer.
Most events are random. The Universe is unorganized.I agree that most events aren't random,
Random equations are not the Universe. False equivalence fallacy.but that isn't the same as saying they were "designed". You can write an equation for basically anything that lawfully happens in the universe, regardless of how messy and complicated it is.
Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics). The Universe is unorganized.I almost exclusively have said the universe is mathematically rational and lawfully organized. I've tried to steer clear for the most part saying that it's designed.
The Universe is not mathematics or random equations.That's not an explanation for why inert and inanimate matter and would behave and interact according to very precise mathematical principles. You can't just sweep that under the rug.
The Universe is not mathematics or random equations. The Universe is unorganized.Leaving aside the question of why matter and energy even exists in the first place, why wouldn't matter and energy just behave chaotically and unpredictably? You would never expect random chance and irrational and inanimate causes to imbue precise organization and rational mathematical principles on a system.
Attempted proof by circular. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics).^^^ Translation: there is no explanation for the cause of a mathematically rational and lawfully organized universe. But somehow, atheists believe it is certain there in no rational agency involved or underlying it all
This worldview of "I don't know" on the one hand, followed up by "I am certain" on the other hand is pure cognitive dissonance and mental confusion.
no.You said that gods are fictional.
That is an assertion.
ANYONE making an assertion assumes the burden of proof for the assertion.
You seem unable to do that...so you are diverting.
That is what many atheists do.
Anywho....God is not Pharaoh.
RQAA. Why do you keep asking the same question over and over and over and over and over and over?Anywho....
Did God kill all the kids on Passover or did Pharaoh?
Right, so it was God who killed all the children, probably none of whom had anything to do with what Pharaoh was doing.RQAA. Why do you keep asking the same question over and over and over and over and over and over?
So, again, anything that occurs lawfully can be explained via an equation.Most events are random. The Universe is unorganized.
Random equations are not the Universe. False equivalence fallacy.
Old Testament.What is an 'iron age story'??
Gods, if they are described as YOU claim, could prove they exist.It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
Right. Negative proofs don't work.It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.
Not by me, but by those who say "prove gods don't exist".Attempted negative proof fallacy.
A comparison isn't a circular argument. Fail.Attempted negative proof fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
Stop making shit up.This is YOUR paradox, Void. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox. You cannot clear your paradox by blaming it on someone else.
RQAA. Stop asking the same thing over and over and over and over and over like a moron.Right, so it was God who killed all the children, probably none of whom had anything to do with what Pharaoh was doing.
Random equations are not the Universe. The Universe is unorganized.So, again, anything that occurs lawfully can be explained via an equation.