Fani Willis' lover Nathan Wade takes the stand, details trips with DA

This is Georgia's REQUIRED standard for a D.A to be removed.

8g3let.jpg


The accusers cannot merely say 'she got kick backs she profited from' and they must provide conclusive proof of that, which they have not.
So you think her personally benefiting from hiring the Special Prosecutor isn't an Actual conflict.:rofl2:
 
So you think her personally benefiting from hiring the Special Prosecutor isn't an Actual conflict.:rofl2:

There has been no personal benefit established.

Simply claiming something is not enough, even though we know Magats think it is, based on the Hunter/Joe Biden accusations.

We are not responsible for your stupidity.
 
It's happened to me twice. ETrade was the worst, I decided to give them a try. I had money wired into the account. Three weeks later I was moving some cash, and they froze the account, demanding to know the source of the funds. It took me two months to clear that up.

I have two checking accounts, I keep funds in both, the account attached to my investment account is my backup. You can't put bank accounts or Roth IRAs in a trust, so that money is exposed, and mistakes happen all the time. Everything else I own, including my home, is in trust. I still carry a million dollar umbrella policy. I have faith in the system, but not enough faith to leave myself exposed.
$5.16 cents doesn't really count.
 
There has been no personal benefit established.

Simply claiming something is not enough, even though we know Magats think it is, based on the Hunter/Joe Biden accusations.

We are not responsible for your stupidity.
She can't prove she paid back for her lavish travel. If she paid Wade back to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest why didn't either one of them keep records to prove it. The judge will not be fooled. :rofl2:
 
She can't prove she paid back for her lavish travel. If she paid Wade back to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest why didn't either one of them keep records to prove it. The judge will not be fooled. :rofl2:

YOu have it backwards as most Magats do.

When you accuse someone of doing something YOU have to prove they did it.

You cannot say 'you did not prove you did not do it', and expect to win. Not unless you are stupid.
 
YOu have it backwards as most Magats do.

When you accuse someone of doing something YOU have to prove they did it.

You cannot say 'you did not prove you did not do it', and expect to win. Not unless you are stupid.
You have it wrong Queer Person, the prosecution has the receipts to prove their case and Wade and Willis do not.
 
Last edited:
You have it wrong Queer Person, the prosecution has the receipts to prove their case and Wade and Willis do not.

Nope.

I know you think that, because you are stupid.

but Willis is under no obligation to prove 'i did not do what i am being accused of'.

The lawyers making that accusation must provide compelling proof of that or the judge will dismiss.
 
Nope.

I know you think that, because you are stupid.

but Willis is under no obligation to prove 'i did not do what i am being accused of'.

The lawyers making that accusation must provide compelling proof of that or the judge will dismiss.
Willis is under no obligation to prove anything you moron. The prosecution proved Wade paid for their lavish vacations. Neither Wade or Willis could prove Willis reimbursed Wade. :rofl2: She is screwed. Literally. The defense star witness blew up today. It was proven that he lied to the court

:magagrin:
 
Willis is under no obligation to prove anything you moron. The prosecution proved Wade paid for their lavish vacations. Neither Wade or Willis could prove Willis reimbursed Wade. :rofl2: She is screwed. Literally. The defense star witness blew up today. It was proven that he lied to the court

...

They cannot prove Willis did not reimburse him, and that is the problem. The burden of proof is AGAIN on those making the accusations and they failed.

If you get off right derp media you will see almost all the legal analysis, whether the legal expert is from the left or right, are saying they do not think the burden was met and most say it was not even close.

Accusations are not proof, but again telling that to the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden gang who live off accusations as the only proof, i know you will struggle to understand that.
 
They cannot prove Willis did not reimburse him, and that is the problem. The burden of proof is AGAIN on those making the accusations and they failed.

If you get off right derp media you will see almost all the legal analysis, whether the legal expert is from the left or right, are saying they do not think the burden was met and most say it was not even close.

Accusations are not proof, but again telling that to the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden gang who live off accusations as the only proof, i know you will struggle to understand that.

What kind of a fuckwad say derp all the time, can anybody sensible answer that?
 
They cannot prove Willis did not reimburse him, and that is the problem. The burden of proof is AGAIN on those making the accusations and they failed.

If you get off right derp media you will see almost all the legal analysis, whether the legal expert is from the left or right, are saying they do not think the burden was met and most say it was not even close.

Accusations are not proof, but again telling that to the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden gang who live off accusations as the only proof, i know you will struggle to understand that.
They kept her off the stand yesterday because they didn't want her to do any more damage...their financial relationship couldn't possibly have been more corrupt....He proved that, and she couldn't undo the damage, no matter how much she flipped in her seat, shouted, or threw papers...
She'll be lucky if she's ever respected in her job position again.
 
Well, according to Fani and her father, cash transactions with zero paper trail is a _________thing... apparently something that only ________people would understand.. I think that testimony was clear...;) No one is buying that, btw, in Fani's case...
She was a hoot to watch, wasn't she?
 
Well, according to Fani and her father, cash transactions with zero paper trail is a _________thing... apparently something that only ________people would understand.. I think that testimony was clear...;) No one is buying that, btw, in Fani's case...
She was a hoot to watch, wasn't she?
She didn't know what the legal definition of "hostile witness " was. The Judge had to explain it to her. :laugh:
 
They kept her off the stand yesterday because they didn't want her to do any more damage...their financial relationship couldn't possibly have been more corrupt....He proved that, and she couldn't undo the damage, no matter how much she flipped in her seat, shouted, or threw papers...
She'll be lucky if she's ever respected in her job position again.

Indeed.

She lied to the court about when her relationship with Wade began.

A witness corroborated that she lied.

Lying to the court is called perjury.

Corruption does not even have to be proven, just the appearance of corruption (per Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional Law Professor at George Washington University) and Willis/Wade appear totally corrupt.
 
MSNBC reports that there is ZERO evidence that Willis did anything remotely wrong.

They are the only credible news source remaining, it seems, so I've no choice but to accept their assessment.

I'm losing patience with all of these drawn out stories.
All I want is Trump in custody or dead. Simple, right?
This fucking country makes the simplest things so very complicated.
It's really pissing off...I won't deny it.

Obama would have had the pigfucking orangutan sleeping with the "fishes" by now.
I miss him.
 
MSNBC reports that there is ZERO evidence that Willis did anything remotely wrong.

They are the only credible news source remaining, it seems, so I've no choice but to accept their assessment.

I'm losing patience with all of these drawn out stories.
All I want is Trump in custody or dead. Simple, right?
This fucking country makes the simplest things so very complicated.
It's really pissing off...I won't deny it.

Obama would have had the pigfucking orangutan sleeping with the "fishes" by now.
I miss him.

Go back to sleep, old man.

You were raised in a barn.

We will awaken you if anything important happens.
 
Professor Jonathan Turley, a Constitutional law professor at George Washington University, says that corruption does not have to be proven, just the appearance of corruption.

With trips all over the world paid for by taxpayers, these two lawyers should be disbarred and jailed for perjury.
 
What kind of a fuckwad say derp all the time, can anybody sensible answer that?

Yes.

A person who deals with derps constantly will refer to them as such.

Derp

foolishness; stupidity
noun. a person or thing considered to be foolish or awkward. foolishness; stupidity.

if you read the above and do not see how it applies to most Magat idiots then you ARE the derp.
 
Queer Person would.

I love how magats think that being queer, or LGBTQ is an insult still, like this is the 50's and you could just say 'your gay' to insult someone.

You prove who you are and why you are magat every day ExpressLane. You are consumed with hate and bile of 'others'.
 
Back
Top