I have told you, I do not know. Keep asking, I am done telling you over and over again.
E Jean Carrol case stands! Appeal denied.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
I do not, I consider unwanted penetration of a vagina rape. Regardless of what penetrated it.
I do not consider unwanted kissing, unless its the vagina or other sexual organ rape or sexual assault.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
It happened sometime during the decade that Hunter's daddy pardoned him for.
Last edited:
Yakuda
Verified User
Then if all that is needed is a claim then Hunter, the talking pig in a pant suit and Brandon are guilty. You're a brain dead idiot.
I think they should at least know in what fuckig hear it happened, but I'll play along. I hear them say "On or about..." so fill in the blank, On or about (________________) trump supposedly raped the gold digging whore.
So you just said sexual assault was the same as rape in your book. The law defines unwanted kissing as sexual assault. Should I assume your parochial legal opinion is about as valid as your opinion on arrest vs detention?
Are you illiterate?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Not a lawyer so I have to look this stuff up:
10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally
10 U.S. Code § 920 - Art. 120. Rape and sexual assault generally
prev | next(a)Rape.—Any person subject to this chapter who commits a sexual act upon another person by—
(1)
using unlawful force against that other person;
(2)
using force causing or likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to any person;
(3)
threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be subjected to death, grievous bodily harm, or kidnapping;
(4)
first rendering that other person unconscious; or
(5)
administering to that other person by force or threat of force, or without the knowledge or consent of that person, a drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance and thereby substantially impairing the ability of that other person to appraise or control conduct;
is guilty of rape and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
(b)Sexual Assault.—Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1)commits a sexual act upon another person by—
(A)
threatening or placing that other person in fear;
(B)
making a fraudulent representation that the sexual act serves a professional purpose; or
(C)
inducing a belief by any artifice, pretense, or concealment that the person is another person;
(2)commits a sexual act upon another person—
(A)
without the consent of the other person; or
(B)
when the person knows or reasonably should know that the other person is asleep, unconscious, or otherwise unaware that the sexual act is occurring; or
(3)commits a sexual act upon another person when the other person is incapable of consenting to the sexual act due to—
(A)
impairment by any drug, intoxicant, or other similar substance, and that condition is known or reasonably should be known by the person; or
(B)
a mental disease or defect, or physical disability, and that condition is known or reasonably should be known by the person;
is guilty of sexual assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
What you "think" is not relevant, but it seems 1995 or 1996.
Yakuda
Verified User
Im not arguing anything I'm asking how he can be found liable for something that you can't tell me when it happened. If she claims it happened on June 16, 2021 for example, but Trump can prove he was out of town on that day, how is the date not important?
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Carroll says it was rape, but it's a he said/she said thing. Pretty common with rapists like Trump.
Did Donald Trump rape E. Jean Carroll? Here's what a jury and judge said.
Nine jurors found Donald Trump had sexually abused E. Jean Carroll, but they didn't call it "rape." Here's why a judge said that word still applies.
www.usatoday.com
I do not always conform my opinions to what is defined by Federal Law.
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
The court heard the case and found him guilty. The dates are in the transcript. Google it rape apologist.
鬼百合
Let It Burn!
Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll even though he was found liable only for 'sexual abuse,' judge rules
Donald Trump raped E. Jean Carroll even though he was found liable only for 'sexual abuse,' judge rules
The jury didn't find Trump "raped" Carroll only because of a quirk in New York state law, according to the judge who oversaw the trial.
www.businessinsider.com
So y
our legal opinion is pretty much useless because it isn't legal. Who pays for bad legal advice?
There was ZERO evidence of any of that other than that filthy old dried up whore saying so. Never mind it parroted a law and order episode right down to the store. Never mind she couldn't recall what year it was. Never mind she was 50 years old at the time and Trump had his choice of thousands of nubiles to bang who had oil left in the crank case that would show on the dipstick.
I think I will go finger bang a dried up old hooch at a store I've never been to. Said no one ever.
Never mind all of that he must have done it because crazy eyes said so. And an orange man bad TDS jury said "well that sounds reasonable" we have to believe her because we hate that motherfucker too!
She will die with her cat vagina at her side never fulfilling her promise to take Richard Maddow shopping abroad.
And you still wonder why America elected him? We're sick and tired of your lies and cuntery. Every single thing about this case wreaks to high heaven yet here you are defending it like the mindless child you are. But it's ok because you hate the motherfucker too right?
You are a sickening human being.