Don't you ever say 'black on black crime' again

Do you think that because black males have a higher percentage of homicide, the fact whites commit the most crimes by number shouldn't be talked about?

[URL="https://www.fbi.gov/about



Because murder is the number one killer of young black men. That's why it gets discussed differently.
 
For those bitching about BLM, save up a little of your hostility for these fine WHITE American organizations.

United States

 
Do you think that because black males have a higher percentage of homicide, the fact whites commit the most crimes by number shouldn't be talked about?

Table 43

Look at it this way Christie, if you can put aside your myopic glasses for just a moment.

You have $105 dollars with you.
A person from group A robs you of a dollar.
And then another person from group A robs you of another dollar.
And finally a third person from group A robs of yet another dollar.

Now you have $102 left.
BUT Suddenly, a person from Group B robs you of the $102.
Which group made the bigger impact on your life, PERCENTAGE WISE?
 
Ray Lewis drew ire for asking why B/B isn't talked about.

For starters, I disagree that it isn't "talked about." The violence in cities like Chicago is always in the news. As someone who watched a lot of the cable "discussion" shows, it definitely gets discussed.

As for BLM not "addressing" it, I think Ray has a fundamental misunderstanding of what their raison d'etre is. It stems from what they see as violence against the black community that comes from racism & discrimination, and unfair targeting by police.
 
I just read his Wiki bio, seems pretty mundane.

No. This is a white guy who lied and claimed he was black and claimed he was beaten up in high school for being black and it was a hate crime even though there was no proof. The guy is a huckster.
 
It appears you're having a problem discerning the point of the thread. Read this until it sinks in. "Yet, the only race-based phrase to ever describe crime is black on black."

no......when a thread is started about a white cop killing a black person, its also a race based phrase.......
 
You're a "pro lifer." How come you don't say something about innocent casualties in war, or about the death penalty? Why aren't you posting every day about murders that occur everywhere?

what's my position on the death penalty, Thing......I have stated it many times on this board.....I have also stated many things about innocent casualties of war......usually that the left has overstated them considerably............
 
The criticsm of BLM just shows such a disconnect. It's a group specifically targeted at violence associated with racism & discrimination. Trust me - this IS still a problem in 2016 America. It's not like civil rights laws passed, and everything has been smooth sailing since.

It just sounds like ignorant white-guy stuff to start whining about how they should care about all lives, or all murders, or black-on-black murders, or this or that. Violence based on discrimination is why they came into being, and what they're about. And that's okay. It's okay for a group to be specifically targeted at one thing, and it's not "hypocritical" in any way that they don't cover the entire gamut of death in the USA.
 
what's my position on the death penalty, Thing......I have stated it many times on this board.....I have also stated many things about innocent casualties of war......usually that the left has overstated them considerably............

Yeah, I've definitely noticed that about your position on casualties in war - that they're really no big deal.
 
Look at it this way Christie, if you can put aside your myopic glasses for just a moment.

You have $105 dollars with you.
A person from group A robs you of a dollar.
And then another person from group A robs you of another dollar.
And finally a third person from group A robs of yet another dollar.

Now you have $102 left.
BUT Suddenly, a person from Group B robs you of the $102.
Which group made the bigger impact on your life, PERCENTAGE WISE?

Group B is Democrats, right?.....
 
For starters, I disagree that it isn't "talked about." The violence in cities like Chicago is always in the news. As someone who watched a lot of the cable "discussion" shows, it definitely gets discussed.

As for BLM not "addressing" it, I think Ray has a fundamental misunderstanding of what their raison d'etre is. It stems from what they see as violence against the black community that comes from racism & discrimination, and unfair targeting by police.

So black lives matter only in the context of white people?
Ray is right to say what about ALL the time in EVERY context.
And likeep it or not, all lives matter.
 
No. This is a white guy who lied and claimed he was black and claimed he was beaten up in high school for being black and it was a hate crime even though there was no proof. The guy is a huckster.

I'm only going by what he himself said. Maybe his mom could clear this up if she wanted to. But I don't give much credence to a Breitbart writer on King's past, either.

"I refuse to speak in detail about the nature of my mother's past, or her sexual partners, and I am gravely embarrassed to even be saying this now, but I have been told for most of my life that the white man on my birth certificate is not my biological father and that my actual biological father is a light-skinned black man. My mother and I have discussed her affair. She was a young woman in a bad relationship and I have no judgment."

http://www.vox.com/2015/8/19/9180389/the-shaun-king-controversy-explained
 
So black lives matter only in the context of white people?
Ray is right to say what about ALL the time in EVERY context.
And likeep it or not, all lives matter.

Of course all lives matter. BLM is NOT saying that all lives do NOT matter. But they're highlighting one particular area that they have simply had enough of, and want to voice an opinion on.

What is wrong with that? I don't get it. If they change their group to "all lives matter" and just talk about murder in general, it completely takes away from what they're trying to change.
 
So black lives matter only in the context of white people?
Ray is right to say what about ALL the time in EVERY context.
And likeep it or not, all lives matter.
They sure do, but the black community has a reason for concern when a disproportionate amount of blacks are being killed by police officers who are public servants.
 
The criticsm of BLM just shows such a disconnect. It's a group specifically targeted at violence associated with racism & discrimination. Trust me - this IS still a problem in 2016 America. It's not like civil rights laws passed, and everything has been smooth sailing since.

It just sounds like ignorant white-guy stuff to start whining about how they should care about all lives, or all murders, or black-on-black murders, or this or that. Violence based on discrimination is why they came into being, and what they're about. And that's okay. It's okay for a group to be specifically targeted at one thing, and it's not "hypocritical" in any way that they don't cover the entire gamut of death in the USA.

If was founded specifically over black deaths at the hands of police.
 
Crime definitely went up. You're also talking about a limited period of time. With the inner cities, we're talking about generations of poverty. There are probably dozens of differentiators if you really want to research the topic and draw a comparison.

Man, do I love, love, LOVE that you jump in and seem to take the "violence is innate in blacks" position right off the bat. What a loser.

See there's where you myopic vision takes hold.
I "jumped in"; because way too many people are letting their FEELINGS dictate how they view this.

For some reason you appear to believe that only Blacks, that live in the inner cities, are the only ones who have ever been affected by poverty.
You seem to be avoiding all other groups that also lived in poverty, with inner cities, like the Irish, the Italians, the Asians, etc and a lot still do.
Unless you have something to show that the PERCENTAGES were some then, as they are now.

I know you so desperately want me to be viewed as a racist and will go to any length to prove it; but you can't and it makes you a very sad little man.

Would you like to guess which group has a higher poverty level then Blacks?

It's Native Americans and Alaskan Natives.

Why aren't their murder rates percentages any where near what Blacks are committing?

Here's another little bit of information you can absorb.
According to Census figures in 2013, 18.9 million whites are poor. That’s 8 million more poor white people than poor black people....

That means that in 2013 poor Whites were roughly at a 2.36 HIGHER percentage rate then Blacks.

Why wasn't the murder rate by Whites 2.36% higher then Blacks during that time period?
Please don't try to make a pathetic attempt to say that only Blacks have a higher "generalization" of continued poverty.
 
Last edited:
A white city?

You really miss the point. So-called "black on black" crime is tied directly to decades of neglect of the inner cities, which in itself has its roots in racism & discrimination - the very things that "BLM" is directed toward.

So I guess you cannot answer the question as well.

Neglect of inner cities is brought on by the democrats that run those cities. Once they have control, they steal everything that is not nailed down, so stop blaming whitey for the failure of inner cities. When those cities were white, they were prosperous and good places to live, then the democrats gained control and everything turned to shit.
 
Back
Top