Don't you ever say 'black on black crime' again

think of the things the white people were doing to the black population in Ferguson.



they were using them as a revenue source which kept them poor and over policed



this is the reality in many places



when you deny its real you deny racism and help it survive
 
i saw this stat before. in 2010 5 most dangerous cities in the US were Flint (53% black) detroit (82% black) st louis (51% black) new haven (37% black) memphis (61% black). 5 safest irvine (1.4% black) Temecula (3.4% black) cary (6.4% black) murrietta (3.4% black) gilbert (2.4% black)

Maybe blacks have a greater propensity of commiting violent crimes on other blacks?
 
tsuke said:
i saw this stat before. in 2010 5 most dangerous cities in the US were Flint (53% black) detroit (82% black) st louis (51% black) new haven (37% black) memphis (61% black). 5 safest irvine (1.4% black) Temecula (3.4% black) cary (6.4% black) murrietta (3.4% black) gilbert (2.4% black)

Maybe blacks have a greater propensity of commiting violent crimes on other blacks?
Click to expand...

Propensity? "an inclination or natural tendency to behave in a particular way."

Do whites have a greater "propensity" for committing violent crimes on other whites?
 
christiefan915 said:
Nobody should be fine with any violence. Why single out black on black?

We need to find the root cause of all violence.
Click to expand...

You're asking why we shouldn't focus on the number one killer of black males ages 16-34? How smart is that? This is where political correctness causes actual harm. Now we do have idiots in this thread and in the country that make anti-black comments. But if you claim to care you can't help the problem by ignoring it and that's essentially what you're asking us to do.
 
cawacko said:
You're asking why we shouldn't focus on the number one killer of black males ages 16-34? How smart is that? This is where political correctness causes actual harm. Now we do have idiots in this thread and in the country that make anti-black comments. But if you claim to care you can't help the problem by ignoring it and that's essentially what you're asking us to do.
Click to expand...
How much focus has been given to the 16-34 year old male violence as a whole? Isn't this is also the group that commits mass murders the most?

Why aren't we discussing this? Why isn't something being done? Why aren't older males reaching out to this group to find out why young males are so dangerous?
 
cawacko said:
You're asking why we shouldn't focus on the number one killer of black males ages 16-34? How smart is that? This is where political correctness causes actual harm. Now we do have idiots in this thread and in the country that make anti-black comments. But if you claim to care you can't help the problem by ignoring it and that's essentially what you're asking us to do.
Click to expand...

It's a horrible statistic, no question about it. But I look at it as a reflection of society, not of young black men's "propensity", i.e. innate tendency toward violence.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's a horrible statistic, no question about it. But I look at it as a reflection of society, not of young black men's "propensity", i.e. innate tendency toward violence.
Click to expand...

Only buffoons like RacerX look at it as some sort of innate thing.

It's circumstance. Poverty breeds crime. More blacks live in poverty.

Not a complicated thing.
 
cawacko said:
You're asking why we shouldn't focus on the number one killer of black males ages 16-34? How smart is that? This is where political correctness causes actual harm. Now we do have idiots in this thread and in the country that make anti-black comments. But if you claim to care you can't help the problem by ignoring it and that's essentially what you're asking us to do.
Click to expand...

You once said you lived in an upper-class section of SF. I'll bet not many young black men from there are committing homicides. And I'm not singling you out, it's the same thing here in Pgh. Crime is centered in the lowest-income neighborhoods.
 
christiefan915 said:
It's a horrible statistic, no question about it. But I look at it as a reflection of society, not of young black men's "propensity", i.e. innate tendency toward violence.
Click to expand...

I've said nothing about black men's 'propensity' for violence. That was one poster.

You can blame society but to leave the status quo as is and to ignore it will do nothing to help better the situation.
 
cawacko said:
You're asking why we shouldn't focus on the number one killer of black males ages 16-34? How smart is that? This is where political correctness causes actual harm. Now we do have idiots in this thread and in the country that make anti-black comments. But if you claim to care you can't help the problem by ignoring it and that's essentially what you're asking us to do.
Click to expand...

This should be addressed to the NRA terrorist
 
The term came about via those tasked with fighting crime to help the public comprehend the challenges and resources required for them to do their job.
And it impacts more than just cops. Fire ambulances deliveries, any effort hard by crime.
You may not like it but ignoring it is far worse than just stupid.
 
christiefan915 said:
You once said you lived in an upper-class section of SF. I'll bet not many young black men from there are committing homicides. And I'm not singling you out, it's the same thing here in Pgh. Crime is centered in the lowest-income neighborhoods.
Click to expand...

There are almost zero black people in my neighborhood. It's rare to see any. In fact next to San Jose San Francisco has the smallest black population of any large city in America. And of that small population a majority live in the Southeast corner of the City where almost no one goes (right next to where Candlestick Park used to stand).

I grew up in Oakland but it was in the largely white and Asian hills. A large majority of the murders in Oakland are committed in the poor flatlands. Now I've spent time in those areas as I had friends/teammates that lived there. Living in government run public housing is not a whole lot of fun and it doesn't take being there long to realize that.

But the numbers don't lie about the number one killer of young black men. I'm but one white dude but I care which is why I volunteered teaching for years at a low income minority high school and worked with sports/education programs targeting minority youth. I'm nobody special but on this issue I do give a shit. And that's why I disagree with this issue of trying to hide the reality of what's happening.
 
Certainly no sort of predispention related to race.
You can involve poverty but it's more a matter of why the poverty is present and won't improve.
Like the war on drugs, the war on poverty is lost. Unless this was the desired effect. "I'll have the ******* voting democratic for the next hundred years". That is working as intended.
 
christiefan915 said:
Ever.

Don't say it.
Don't think it.
Don't write it.
Don't spell it on Scrabble.
Don't even see what other words you can make with the letters that form black on black crime. It is the dumbest, most ridiculously racist phrase used to describe crime in the world right now.

Have you ever heard anybody talk about white on white crime? Have you ever seen any white folk march about white crime, have conferences or gatherings focused on white on white crime? Don't lie—you know you haven't.

Almost all crime in America is committed intra-racially. That is to say, the overwhelming majority of crimes are committed by a racial group against that same group. Yet, the only race-based phrase to ever describe crime is black on black.

Did you know....
Whites are 6 times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person; and overall, the percentage of white Americans who will be murdered by a black offender in a given year is only 2/10,000ths of 1 percent (0.0002). This means that only 1 in every 500,000 white people will be murdered by a black person in a given year. Although the numbers of black-on-white homicides are higher than the reverse (447 to 218 in 2010), the 218 black victims of white murderers is actually a higher percentage of the black population interracially killed than the 447 white victims of black murderers as a percentage of the white population. In fact, any given black person is 2.75 times as likely to be murdered by a white person as any given white person is to be murdered by an African American.
​

You didn't know that. Fox News doesn't tell you that type of truth because it doesn't fit their agenda. The only reason the phrase black on black crime even exists is in some racist attempt to make it some like black folk have some unique problem with committing crimes against each other that other folk don't have. It's just not true.

And when you say it, you are a part of the problem.

Stop. Now. Forever. Thank you.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/8/14/1412131/-Don-t-you-ever-say-black-on-black-crime-again
Click to expand...
I'll stop talking about "black on black crime" as soon as the BLM idiots realize that, in fact, "almost all crime in America is committed intra-racially". I've known this for decades. Most white people have known about it regardless of what the dailykos says. Probably a big reason why there is no "White Lives Matter" movement. And I don't care how you slice and dice the percentages, more black people are murdered by black people than by white people, and if they really put forth an effort to curb "black on black crime" instead of marching around with signs, cursing the police and causing traffic jams, maybe they would be taken more seriously. So dailykos, you can kiss my ass. And stop telling me what to think and say. Stop. Now. Forever. Thank you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top