Dems hit 1st night out of the park

Darla said:
Welp, he's not going to place Hillary's name into nomination tonight. So why not? In my view, Bernie always wants something for Bernie. I know this is not the widely held view of him, but when the books are written, I bet they prove me right.

Hillary placed Obama's name into nomination and asked for nothing in return. Today it was reported there was a negotiation. What did Bernie demand? Well whatever, he's not going to be doing it. And all I am doing is speculating right?
Click to expand...

hillary got secretary of state and the nomination in 8 years in return :)
 
Thing1 said:
This is bull, too. If there were under 10 candidates in the GOP field, Trump wouldn't have won.
Click to expand...

when the voting actually started i think there were only 7-8 left. than around 6-7 in NH one week after and maybe around 4-5 in sc.
 
tsuke said:
when the voting actually started i think there were only 7-8 left. than around 6-7 in NH one week after and maybe around 4-5 in sc.
Click to expand...

All of the other candidates split the vote.

Trump never should have been a serious candidate. It's an embarrasment for the GOP, and for America.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no....neither did Bush.....that's just another meaningless liberal meme.......
Click to expand...

Yes he did.

Poll: 70% believe Saddam, 9-11 link

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly seven in 10 Americans believe it is likely that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, says a poll out almost two years after the terrorists' strike against this country.

Sixty-nine percent in a Washington Post poll published Saturday said they believe it is likely the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks carried out by al-Qaeda. A majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents believe it's likely Saddam was involved.

The belief in the connection persists even though there has been no proof of a link between the two.

President Bush and members of his administration suggested a link between the two in the months before the war in Iraq. Claims of possible links have never been proven, however.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-06-poll-iraq_x.htm
 
Thing1 said:
All of the other candidates split the vote.

Trump never should have been a serious candidate. It's an embarrasment for the GOP, and for America.
Click to expand...

The whole media was playing the whole if x drops out 100% of his voters go to y. They didnt a lot went to trump.

Facts are facts. The revolution suceeded in the GOP and failed in the democrat party. We have the emails to prove how hard the dems worked to stop it.
 
Thing1 said:
Covering it? Sure.

A big story that eclipses "everything"?

Bzzzzzzzt! Sorry.
Click to expand...

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, So now you want to move the goal posts and add in "A big story that eclipses everything"", when that was never part of your comment about it not being covered (or something to that effect)!!

At least enjoy the silver platter, that you had your ass handed to you on. :D

But then, you're going to vote for Hillary, no matter what, so WHATEVER.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, So now you want to move the goal posts and add in "A big story that eclipses everything"", when that was never part of your comment about it not being covered (or something to that effect)!!

At least enjoy the silver platter, that you had your ass handed to you on. :D

But then, you're going to vote for Hillary, no matter what, so WHATEVER.
Click to expand...

Um....that's how the conversation started w/ tsuke, USF?

Too damned funny. God, are you dim.
 
tsuke said:
The whole media was playing the whole if x drops out 100% of his voters go to y. They didnt a lot went to trump.

Facts are facts. The revolution suceeded in the GOP and failed in the democrat party. We have the emails to prove how hard the dems worked to stop it.
Click to expand...

Trump sucks.

Worst GOP candidate in modern history. I'm too lazy to go back further than that - but even with all of those nutty post-Revolution guys, probably still the worst conservative candidate.
 
Thing1 said:
Um....that's how the conversation started w/ tsuke, USF?

Too damned funny. God, are you dim.
Click to expand...

You obviously think that no one has the ability to look at previous posts, where it can be seen that now you're lying; because here's how the conversation with tsuke started.

He said:
tsuke said:
knocking it out of the park for dems apparently means having their candidate booed by half the convention :)
Click to expand...

Then you replied:
Thing1 said:
And good humor for you is Trump making fun of a disabled guy.

The only people who didn't think last night was pretty great for Democrats are extreme partisans & Trump supporters. I didn't even see one story on the boos this morning (oh, I know - the media isn't everything; what "you" think is so much more vital to the narrative).
Click to expand...

I then entered the exchange with:
USFREEDOM911 said:
Then its because you're not looking or are just afraid to see them; because I googled "Hillary booed" and the search came back with 7,550,000 results.

There are none so blind, as those who will not see.
But then, whatever.
Click to expand...

Since then you have tried to hide from the facts, divert the direction of the exchange, and then finally resorted to lying.

In ANY part of your comments, except for the one where you tried to move the goal posts, please show where you implied, hinted at, or suggested that you meant any of your comments to mean A big story that eclipses "everything".



Ready
Set
GO

:chesh:
 
Thing1 said:
Trump sucks.

Worst GOP candidate in modern history. I'm too lazy to go back further than that - but even with all of those nutty post-Revolution guys, probably still the worst conservative candidate.
Click to expand...

You're not going "back further" because you're lay.
You don't want to have to go back and eat your own words; but then, this isn't the first time you spewed out something, got called on it, and then ran like your ass was on fire. :D
 
Darla said:
OMG he STILL hasn't gotten a comma right. Just pure chance dictates he would have by now. Dear Lord.
Click to expand...

Do you always praise the Lord, after you suckee fuckee; because it might just be an example that maybe you are sorry for your whorish ways. :D
 
Darla said:
I will give Sanders credit in that apparently he is bringing the hammer down on his small contingent of little titty babies, Sarandon included, this morning. And he is supposedly going to be nominating Hillary himself tonight, like she did for Obama when she stopped the roll call vote at some point, I think after NY, and nominated him.

We will see how this goes.
Click to expand...

there you go Bernie supporters......this is what the real Democrats think of you......you little titty babies, you......now go vote for Hillary and stfu.......
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Meh....Bernie has reveled and taken advantage of his status as an independent for years. Now when he decides to run for President he expects the party establishment to rally behind his cause and to play fair with him? Sorry but that's not how party politics work. Anyone who is surprised by this probably shouldn't be discussing politics.
Click to expand...
I think the question was whether Bernie's voters thought the party ought to play fair with them......but you're right.....that isn't how Democrats roll.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top