Dems hit 1st night out of the park

Thing1 said:
Whoa- you're right! Tsuke was talking about the email story overshadowing "everything."

I did get confused, because they were both such small blips in the news that you & tsuke were trying to make a massive deal out of.

So, in this case, you got me. I have to give it to you, anyway - I feel awful that you had to invest so much time going over the whole thread multiple times & copying a few dozen posts over & over again. I can't imagine how sad a life has to be to put that kind of time in over minutiae like this.

All yours, buddy. I'll pray for you.
Click to expand...

You didn't GET confused.
It's the way you always are. :D

The time I "invested" really amounted to nothing at all; but I do love watching your flop around like a gaffed fish. :chesh:

Hey Thing - whatever.

:lol:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
You didn't GET confused.
It's the way you always are. :D

The time I "invested" really amounted to nothing at all; but I do love watching your flop around like a gaffed fish. :chesh:

Hey Thing - whatever.

:lol:
Click to expand...

No way I believe that. You worked hard for that big "win." What a highlight for you, though.

But actually, taking a very quick look at my response to tsuke which you made hay over, I remembered why I worded it that way - because he had already used that language about the email story. So, I was just throwing back at him, because both assertions were silly.

So, I wasn't wrong after all. Sorry 'bout that! Especially w/ the time you put in.
 
Thing1 said:
No way I believe that. You worked hard for that big "win." What a highlight for you, though.

But actually, taking a very quick look at my response to tsuke which you made hay over, I remembered why I worded it that way - because he had already used that language about the email story. So, I was just throwing back at him, because both assertions were silly.

So, I wasn't wrong after all. Sorry 'bout that! Especially w/ the time you put in.
Click to expand...

And see, there is were you're in error.
For me to work hard at proving you lied, would mean that you mean something to me and I know this is going to upset you; but you don't. :D

That's it Thing, work real hard on trying to save your ass.

ass-1.jpg


By the way, WHATEVER. :p
 
Thing1 said:
It started slow, imo, but he definitely does that by design. Blew the roof off at the end.

The striking thing, yet again, is the contrast to last week. Pessimism vs. hope, dark vs. light. Trump's on the wrong side.
Click to expand...

The only thing blowing is the hot air coming out of your mouth.

Maybe Rana, Darla, and christiefan will all buy some blue dresses and cigars to do some of their own "blowing" for Bill.
 
christiefan915 said:
"Deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (search) may have not been involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, but he definitely is linked to the terrorists who did commit those crimes, President Bush said Wednesday."

There was no effing reason for bush to mention the words "Sept. 11, 2001" in his speeches about Iraq. But he did, and everybody except dummies like you knows why.
Click to expand...

Saddam Hussein was linked to Jihadist groupd EG Abu Zarqawi the founder of ISIL was in Iraq before 2003.
 
Thing1 said:
Whoa- you're right! Tsuke was talking about the email story overshadowing "everything."

I did get confused, because they were both such small blips in the news that you & tsuke were trying to make a massive deal out of.

So, in this case, you got me. I have to give it to you, anyway - I feel awful that you had to invest so much time going over the whole thread multiple times & copying a few dozen posts over & over again. I can't imagine how sad a life has to be to put that kind of time in over minutiae like this.

All yours, buddy. I'll pray for you.
Click to expand...

Yes yes Hillary being booed repeatedly and Sanders supporters walking out and staging a sit in that have turned into massive protests are not big stories.
 
christiefan915 said:
"Deposed Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein (search) may have not been involved in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, but he definitely is linked to the terrorists who did commit those crimes, President Bush said Wednesday."

There was no effing reason for bush to mention the words "Sept. 11, 2001" in his speeches about Iraq. But he did, and everybody except dummies like you knows why.
Click to expand...
I imagine most of those who weren't idiots would realize he said Saddam wasn't involved with 9/11 and that it is illogical to think therefore that he said he was......but obviously that doesn't include liberals who still think that's what he said more than ten years later......I love the way you used a quote of him saying "no" to try to prove he said "yes".......classic Chrispyism.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top