I'm pretty sure they got the information yesterday like the rest of us did.....it was on the news afterall.....
Okay. So you think they are dumb.
I'm pretty sure they got the information yesterday like the rest of us did.....it was on the news afterall.....
Well Pimp does after all, hold a Juris Doctorate.
Saved up a hundred gum wrappers to get it, too.
No small feat, that.
They did nothing with them for the first 3 years of Trumps Presidency. Another example of trump corruption
Your link is wrong, and the returns will be made public very soon, just as trump promised.
The link is not wrong it's just not applicable.
It says in his link that no federal employee, officer or any other person can release someone else's tax return.
That is the gist of the wording of the statute he's basing his argument on.
I pointed out to him that Congress, specifically the House Ways and Means Committee, are not considered an employee, officer, or a person.
It is a government body or entity, that has powers above and beyond that of individuals.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...t-Trump%92s-tax-returns&p=5419555#post5419555
But of course, Pimp doesn't want to be reasoned with.
He would rather desperately cling to his fast fading hope that something or someone will somehow step in and save his orange clown hero from the destruction and ruin that looks to be heading in his direction.
as I pointed out before, the problem with your argument is that the SC has previously determined that the statute applied to the IRS, which is obviously just as muchh a government entity as the committee is......
Okay. So you think they are dumb.
no....I think that they haven't spoken regarding it yet.......unless you have evidence otherwise.......generally the SC doesn't speak on a matter until someone asks them to.......do you think someone might seek a court order preventing the committee from releasing the documents?.......
no....I think that they haven't spoken regarding it yet.......unless you have evidence otherwise.......generally the SC doesn't speak on a matter until someone asks them to.......do you think someone might seek a court order preventing the committee from releasing the documents?.......
is that your final answer?......would you like to call a friend?.......maybe cite some authority for your denial?......
as I pointed out before, the problem with your argument is that the SC has previously determined that the statute applied to the IRS, which is obviously just as muchh a government entity as the committee is......
And yet nobody in the entire country of America spoke up except you? You have a huge ego.
???....you think I'm the only person in the country that says they can't?.......
???....you think I'm the only person in the country that says they can't?.......
as already covered.....in the oral arguments before the court the committee argued that they had a constitutional obligation to see if the IRS was filling its duty to examine the tax records of elected officials........the court said, for that purpose, they had a right to the documentsIf Trump's returns are so sacred, why did the SCOTUS end up allowing the IRS (or the Treasury Dept to be precise) to release them to Congress?
absolutely not........making them public is not part of the committee's duty to regulate the IRS.......there is no to even make a rational argument that it is......Once the SCOTUS allowed them to be released to Congress that opened the door for Congress to make them public.
as already covered.....in the oral arguments before the court the committee argued that they had a constitutional obligation to see if the IRS was filling its duty to examine the tax records of elected officials........the court said, for that purpose, they had a right to the documents
absolutely not........making them public is not part of the committee's duty to regulate the IRS.......there is no to even make a rational argument that it is......
as already covered.....in the oral arguments before the court the committee argued that they had a constitutional obligation to see if the IRS was filling its duty to examine the tax records of elected officials........the court said, for that purpose, they had a right to the documents
absolutely not........making them public is not part of the committee's duty to regulate the IRS.......there is no to even make a rational argument that it is......
Reading comprehension isn't your forte, sorry Ma'am.
I'm glad we agree you're an idiot.....