OTE=Damocles;713592]Yet you provide an emotional scenario and ask if I suddenly think that it is okay to kill people who may be innocent of the crime.
i'm sorry murder, rape etc....is "emotional" for you....you're the one being emotional as the crimes obviously bother you, yet you use the weak "emotional" logical fallacy when we are talking about murder, rape, torture, etc.....geee...how wrong is it for us to think with emotions
spock
Yes, I believe that living in such circumstances is far more of a punishment and a deterrent than the death penalty is. Especially for those who wish to be "martyrs". There is no reason to give somebody convicted of such crimes what they want or a good life.
i appreciate your beliefs, but your beliefs are not fact and are not deterrents. if a murderer wants to kill himself or herself after such a horrific crime, why should the state stop them? and
force them to
endure years of "torture" vis a vis the criminal justice system as we have it now?
you know i am talking about martyrs....
Those in prison can still work to prove innocence, those who are dead cannot.
fair enough....that doesn't change the benefit of the death penalty to society
I am saying that if it was shown that such penalties were effectively making such crimes non-existent then I may consider such a thing moral. I still don't think it is the best way to punish people who commit such crimes. I think a small room and no contact with the outside (other than attorney during the hour where they get their lonely "exercise" time) is a far better punishment than a long nap.
again with the non existent. that is fantasy talk damo. you consider solitary confinement with only one hour a day outside a cell as "humane"......others consider that torture
It does if we are going to continue to protect those pesky things that get in the way that we so often call "rights".
you still didn't address your strawman....and the "rights"..... is a life raft....you want to talk about rights, yet you want to lock someone up 23 hours a day in a small cell....
Because conviction isn't permanent unless the penalty is death. Those alive in prison can always work to prove their innocence. Groups right now have gotten many people off that were set for death. Unfortunately those same groups have often proved innocence too late.
fair enough, but you believe locking someone up in a tiny cell 23 hours a day is ok....but death is not, despite the fact that some murderers WANT the death penalty....i don't know much about buddhism, but i find it interesting that you believe living 50 or so years under total lock down, 23 hours a day in a small cell, is better than death