AN INTERESTING FACT ABOUT SLAVERY IN AMERICA THAT IS NEVER MENTIONED.

The Party Switch Myth….
Talk is cheap, results count.

Electoral College results https://i1.wp.com/metrocosm.com/wp-...9/presidential-election-results-1888-1948.png
presidential-election-results-1888-1948.png

1960. https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/1960_large.png

1964. https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/1964_large.png

1972. https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/1972_large.png

1992. https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/1992_large.png

2012. https://www.270towin.com/historical_maps/2012_large.png
 
Well, if my understanding of biology is correct, they didn’t need to import new slaves, in fact, by then, the US had decreased importing slaves, besides, with Great Britain banning the trade, the US’s ban wasn’t a big deal

Wow for once Arsecheese got something right!
 
They had enough blacks to breed their own slaves!

When faced with the numbers of the transatlantic slave trade, U.S. citizens are frequently surprised by the fact that less than 400,000 enslaved Africans were carried to North America out of the more than ten million people that were disembarked by slave ships in the Americas between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuries. (For estimates of the transatlantic slave trade, see www.slavevoyages.org). Of all major American regions of slave disembarkation, British North America (after 1776, the United States) was ahead only of the Danish Caribbean during the whole period of the transatlantic slave trade. At the other end was Portuguese America (after 1822, Brazil), which received almost five million enslaved Africans between 1501 and 1866.

https://yalebooks.yale.edu/2016/11/...e-u-s-and-brazil-comparisons-and-connections/
 
When faced with the numbers of the transatlantic slave trade, U.S. citizens are frequently surprised by the fact that less than 400,000 enslaved Africans were carried to North America out of the more than ten million people that were disembarked by slave ships in the Americas between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuries. (For estimates of the transatlantic slave trade, see www.slavevoyages.org). Of all major American regions of slave disembarkation, British North America (after 1776, the United States) was ahead only of the Danish Caribbean during the whole period of the transatlantic slave trade. At the other end was Portuguese America (after 1822, Brazil), which received almost five million enslaved Africans between 1501 and 1866.

https://yalebooks.yale.edu/2016/11/...e-u-s-and-brazil-comparisons-and-connections/

The same article points out that US international slave trade ended in 1808. South America kept importing slaves for 58 more years.

It was the federal act abolishing the transatlantic slave trade to the United States after January 1, 1808, that stopped what had the potential to be the largest branch of the transatlantic slave trade in the nineteenth century
 
You guys are dumb. The Dems that were involved in the KKK and racism moved to the Repubs in total after LBJ passed the equal rights laws in 1964. They were also upset when Harry Truman integrated the armed service in 1948. They started a state's rights party and ran the Senate's biggest bigot Thurman for president. Eventually, they moved into the party of hate and became Repubs. The Dem party fought with the Dixiecrats, mostly over equal rights. The bigots found a comfortable home in the Repub party. They agree on most policies too.
The KKK was started by Confederate soldiers after the Civil War.


Ohh, the big lie, how exciting.

So the democrats "moved" to the Republicans, huh?

Who, specifically?

Orval Faubus - the democrat who used Troops to defy REPUBLICAN Eisenhower's order to allow black children in Little Rock schools. Well no - Faubus was a proud democrat until the day he died.

Robert Byrd, Grand Kleagle of the Ku Klux Klan? Nope - democrat until he went to meet Satan - Joe Biden praised him at his funeral.

Bull Conner - the filthy democrat fuck who used fire hoses on civil rights protesters in Alabama? No again - democrat until death.

George Wallace? Nope - George ran as an "independent" for president, but then went right back to the Bussom of the whore of Babylon - the democrat party.

Albert Gore - Klansman and Senator who declared "Segregation Now and Forever?" - Nope, Al Gore was a lifelong Socialist democrat.

In fact all of the above were DEDICATED supporters of FDR and socialism.

As always, you're just blatantly lying - trying to blame your victims for your sins.
 
Neither term applies, but the GOP of the Lincoln era were far left for the era, they were called “Radical” for a reason

"Left" in what way?

I understand the desperation of the filthy democrats to rewrite history to erase the crime against humanity you committed - but this lie of yours, it's really fucking stupid.

From the trail of tears, slavery, the Klan, Jim Crow, to BLM, the democrats have been behind virtually all racism in America. democrats NEVER change. It is the nature of evil.
 
Last edited:
"Left" in what way?

I understand the desperation of the filthy democrats to rewrite history to erase the crime against humanity you committed - but this lie of yours, it's really fucking stupid.

From the trail of tears, slavery, the Klan, Jim Crow, to BLM, the democrats been behind virtually all racism in America. democrats NEVER change. It is the nature of evil.
Same for dingo-fucking, wife-beating Down Under dumbasses.
 
Including the lefts racist hero Byrd


Out of hundreds of Segregationists, the left looks at ONE who switched parties and claims "see, all the segregationists became republicans."

In the hivemind of the democrat Reich - no one other than Strom Thurmond existed. Mention vile racist segregationists like Fritz Hollings and the drones will have a blank stare.

Personally, I think the GOP should have shunned Thurmond, he was never an actual Republican anyway - always tied to the socialist/fascist ideas of FDR.
 
Last edited:
They had enough blacks to breed their own slaves!

democrats have enough Hispanics to breed their own slaves now - but still import 5 million a year.

But I guess Hispanics don't stay slaves past the first generation, so democrats have to import more.
 
Racist Byrd died a Dim


ALL the Dixiecrats did. Strom Thurmond was the ONLY one who switched parties.

There was never any shift with the racist pigs.

The next generation in the south was Republican - and segregation ended. There was no shift - when democrats lost the south because the younger generation rejected the cancer that is the democrats - segregation ended and civil rights became a reality.
 
When faced with the numbers of the transatlantic slave trade, U.S. citizens are frequently surprised by the fact that less than 400,000 enslaved Africans were carried to North America out of the more than ten million people that were disembarked by slave ships in the Americas between the sixteenth and the nineteenth centuries. (For estimates of the transatlantic slave trade, see www.slavevoyages.org). Of all major American regions of slave disembarkation, British North America (after 1776, the United States) was ahead only of the Danish Caribbean during the whole period of the transatlantic slave trade. At the other end was Portuguese America (after 1822, Brazil), which received almost five million enslaved Africans between 1501 and 1866.

https://yalebooks.yale.edu/2016/11/...e-u-s-and-brazil-comparisons-and-connections/


Heresy, America is responsible for ALL slavery in human history - just ask ANY democrat.

Donald Trump caused slavery.
 
The last slave ship, the Clotilda, came to Mobile Bay in 1859. Slavery continued.

Proof banning things doesn't work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clotilda_(slave_ship)
The schooner Clotilda (often misspelled Clotilde) was the last known U.S. slave ship to bring captives from Africa to the United States, arriving at Mobile Bay, in autumn 1859[1] or on July 9, 1860,[2][3] with 110 African men, women, and children.[4] The ship was a two-masted schooner, 86 feet (26 m) long with a beam of 23 ft (7.0 m).

U.S. involvement in the Atlantic slave trade had been banned by Congress through the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves enacted on March 2, 1807 (effective January 1, 1808), but the practice continued illegally, especially through slave traders based in New York[citation needed] in the 1850s and early 1860. In the case of the Clotilda, the voyage's sponsors were based in the South and planned to buy Africans in Whydah, Dahomey.[1][2] After the voyage, the ship was burned and scuttled in Mobile Bay in an attempt to destroy the evidence.
 
No, I did not say that, cant you read?


Yes, you did say that.

You have no honor.

You're promoting the big lie.

As with EVERY Dixiecrat save Strom Thurmond, George Wallace remained a democrat until his death.

Wallace was evil, and if someone is evil, they're a democrat.

We ALL know this.
 
Back
Top