A great first step to ending Abortion!

Grumpy said:
M5qxEai.jpg
Click to expand...
Projection.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Not a proof... learn what a proof is...


WRONG. Religion depends on faith.


You are incapable of avoiding it, however... ALL humans make use of religion... EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. of them... You are not an exception... Humans are religious animals...
Click to expand...
And faith depends on an absence of evidence.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Not a proof... learn what a proof is...


WRONG. Religion depends on faith.


You are incapable of avoiding it, however... ALL humans make use of religion... EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. of them... You are not an exception... Humans are religious animals...
Click to expand...

Only as far as they are irrational.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
The Exodus verse doesn't say that at all, and the other one you didn't narrow down enough so I'm not sure where you are pulling that idea from...
Click to expand...
You are, as always, in denial. The Exodus verse says that those causing a miscarriage are only liable for a fine, which means that they did not commit murder and that the fetus has no right to life. The other passage mandates abortion in specific circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
I call this the "you don't understand" mantra, one of many mantras which I ignore on sight since it makes no argument...

I explained quite clearly in that comment what 'judicial power' means, according to the US Constitution. It has NOTHING to do with interpreting the Constitution.
Click to expand...
You explained nothing. You just stated that your opinion is all that matters, no matter what words actually mean. You had, as usual, no argument.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Circular reasoning is NOT always fallacious... In fact, circular reasoning in and of itself is a logically valid form of reasoning, since its conclusion follows from its predicate(s). Circular reasoning only becomes fallacious if one tries to prove it.

[1] Do you not use your memory to validate your memory?
[2] Do you not use your reasoning skills to validate your reasoning skills?

These are examples of circular reasoning that we regularly make use of in our day to day lives... Are we acting fallaciously?
Click to expand...
Religion is circular reasoning based on an imaginary predicate.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
gfm7175 said:
Inversion Fallacy. YOU are the one with the dogmatic beliefs... I have provided detailed definitions for all those words, and shown why those definitions are sound definitions... YOU have yet to make counterarguments nor provide better definitions for those words...
Click to expand...

You have provided your opinions, based entirely on your dogma.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Wolverine said:
Because of common decency which you do not have! You can dress up human life as zygote fetus or clumo of cells it does change the fact that what you are murdering is a human life. Were it a bag full of puppies,(I love puppies) you libs would lose your mind, but in fairness puppies are not humans!
Click to expand...
And even more just because you say so.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
rjhenn said:
You are, as always, in denial. The Exodus verse says that those causing a miscarriage are only liable for a fine, which means that they did not commit murder and that the fetus has no right to life. The other passage mandates abortion in specific circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

That verse is not speaking of a miscarriage...
 
rjhenn said:
You are, as always, in denial. The Exodus verse says that those causing a miscarriage are only liable for a fine, which means that they did not commit murder and that the fetus has no right to life. The other passage mandates abortion in specific circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I CLEARLY showed otherwise!
 
Quote Originally Posted by rjhenn View Post
You are, as always, in denial. The Exodus verse says that those causing a miscarriage are only liable for a fine
Click to expand...
its embarrassing when people only use AtheistsRUs websites as authority instead of the Bible text.......the actual Bible verse says that if the child does NOT die he is liable for a fine.....

22 “If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely[e] but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23 But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.
Click to expand...
 
rjhenn said:
Guns don't cause children to be gunned down in schools. Your stupid gun control laws have only made that worse. We need to research what motivates these killers. But you gun paranoid control freaks oppose worthwhile research because it doesn't put the blame on guns.
Click to expand...

What the fuck are you talking about? We're the ones who want the CDC to study gun violence and deaths.

Though, it's pretty obvious what the conclusions will be of why there's so much gun violence; toxic masculinity and personal control issues.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top