A great first step to ending Abortion!

So you buy a gun to arm yourself against criminals armed with guns they stole from homes and cars that were bought to defend against thieves and criminals.

If you can't see how fucked up that is, then you're too far gone.
What's really fucked up is the fact that there is no evidence that any of your "common sense" gun laws have ever done anything except make things worse, yet control freaks keep pushing for more of the same thing that's never worked in the past. There couldn't be a clearer example of Einstein's definition of insanity


Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 
Your gun negates his +3 strength.

Unless, of course, he has a gun. Which is entirely possible and likely, and which you warned about when you said that criminals are what we should worry about.


So you get most of your knowledge about reality from video games?

You're the one who said that guns make weak people feel strong. I am trying to ascertain the value of that strength that a gun adds. You won't say what that value is, only very ambiguously that it "negates" strength for whatever weird reason.

Then there's the inconvenient fact that the guns most criminals use are sourced to "responsible gun owners".

Last year, about 150,000 guns were stolen from people just like you. How many of those guns end up being used by criminals?
 
No society works best when the criminals and crazies are afraid of everyone else.

But you don't know who those people are and you never will.

And someone could think you're one of those people.


Open carry used to be common, and no one gave it a second thought.

Are you fucking kidding? Wild West Times were not good times. And open carry was banned because of how reckless and irresponsible you people are.


Then paranoia about guns took over and things have been going downhill since.

No, what happened is that guns became easier to use and their killing power was increased. So before, in wild west times, the most any pistol could hold was six shots. Semi-automatic rifles weren't a thing. Shotguns scattered.

Today, guns can hold dozens, hundreds of rounds of ammo and fire all those rounds in under a minute.

If you want a musket, I'm fine with that. A gun that takes 1 minute to load seems about right for me. That's all the protection anyone would need, right? One shot.
 
I said that guns serve as an equaliser, to negate the advantage that strength or numbers might give an attacker.

That is not what you said.

This is you changing what you meant.

What you said before was that guns are good for weak people to feel strong.

The gun might make you feel strong, but you're still a weak person.
 
The only "fucked up" part is your being on the side of the thieves and criminals.

You're the ones who are giving them the guns they are using in their crimes.

You buy a gun to protect your home and car from criminals and thieves armed with guns they stole from homes and cars.
 
What's really fucked up is the fact that there is no evidence that any of your "common sense" gun laws have ever done anything except make things worse

What "common sense gun laws"?

Things aren't worse...they're about exactly the same.

The same number of people killed by guns in 1980 is the number killed by guns in 2018.
 
Back
Top