Race to salvage sinking cargo ship carrying 3,000 vehicles including 350 Mercedes

When they do burn they tend to be harder to extinguish.

Nordbutt is making shit up. It's a blatant lie. EVs burn like a firework, and burn much faster than any fire in a gasoline powered car (unless the fuel tank itself is violently ruptured and it's contents ignited). EVs will also catch fire without warning, just sitting there. No accident, no anything. Just sitting there.
 
The tech is more than ready as compared to major tech innovation in other areas.

it is thru the move to mass production, coming in the next wave, we will see a constant stream of improvements.

EVs are not a 'tech innovation'. They existed BEFORE internal combustion engines were even used in cars.
The Li-ion battery is not 'cutting edge' either. It was developed 40 years ago.
 
Because Obama wanted them. Remember the whole lightbulb fiasco? I remember one geezer screaming how he had bought an entire case of incandescents because he was against fluorescent light bulbs...mainly because he didn't like Obama. LOL

The whole 'lightbulb fiasco' is fascism, Sock.
 
One hopes you are not so ignorant that you imagine that I care what you claim to think of me....I was simply making the point that the WOKE are not liberal....they are the opposite of liberals who have stolen the name just as they stole the label progressive when they are in fact the exact opposite again...regressives.

Pivot fallacy. You were making no such point (until now). The 'WOKE' are liberals. This buzzword simply describes a justification for their racism, perversions, and revision of history.
 
Why does the West want the Chinese to hold them to ransom? Rare earths like neodymium, praseodymium, dysprosium, metals like chromium, lithium, nickel and copper are almost all controlled by the Chinese.

All of these materials are in the States, and in good quantities, but Biden and the Democrats won't let anyone mine them.
 
Bulverism. Bigotry.
Too funny. I was warned about altering a quote, and here you are totally butchering the same quote from February over a dozen times now ... and I bet no one has said anything to you, right? Well, if you can get away with it, more power to you. Of course, I can't think of anyone who would willingly read your posts so it's likely that no one even knows.

deb95c059d50b644e6cf5c3b0a3a0e75.jpg
 
Too funny. I was warned about altering a quote, and here you are totally butchering the same quote from February over a dozen times now ... and I bet no one has said anything to you, right?
Why would they, dumbass? You didn't even read the fucking rule much less comprehend it. Here's a hint, Sybil: Rule #16.
16. Quote Box Altering:

One can alter a quote box by removing some of a wall of text to expose the specific part you are responding to, or splitting it apart so you can respond to each item one at a time. However, altering the words posted and changing the meaning of what they said for whatever reason (a joke for instance) is not allowed unless you change the "quoted by" portion of the quote to make it clear that the original poster did not post what you are "making" them say. We will begin by deleting these posts, and if it continues we will get into banning. I will update this rule with changes until it settles in.
 
Back
Top