Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'

Nope. Everyone knows that 100% biological male has a penis and 100% biological female has a vagina. It's a biological fact.

2d1ee8b0-3c16-4959-8d6e-ef5bcee1cd83_text.gif

So why didn't that dozy mare Jackson say that then?
 
your brain went down the drain
~~

CRT is well explained -so much it's a law school course

The 1619 Project is a long-form journalism endeavor developed by Nikole Hannah-Jones, writers from The New York Times, and The New York Times Magazine which "aims to reframe the country's history by placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of Black Americans at the very center of the United States' .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1619_Project

-->You are an ignorant troll - that much is easily explained

You're an unregistered foreign agent, comrade Dookie. If you really live in America, do your neighbors know you work for Putin's authoritarian state against them?

Do they realize you send reports of troop movements and other information back to your handlers?

Do you help smuggle sanctioned goods back to Mother Russia, Dookie?

Law school isn't taught in K-12, you fucking moron.
 
You're an unregistered foreign agent, comrade Dookie. If you really live in America, do your neighbors know you work for Putin's authoritarian state against them?

Do they realize you send reports of troop movements and other information back to your handlers?

Do you help smuggle sanctioned goods back to Mother Russia, Dookie?

Law school isn't taught in K-12, you fucking moron.

Do you notice that they have never given any example of them teaching CRT or the "framework" in public schools?
 
The trans mod are a right bunch of intolerant numptys

" Some Women Have Penises': Placard-wielding trans rights protestors besiege feminist campaigners' meeting held to discuss women-only spaces"

"The group was hosting its annual conference to consider 'the importance and future of single-sex provision in policy and law'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...st-campaigners-meeting.html#comments-10654579

and this is where we are and why China is going to roll us
 
With all of this confusion around the definition of "woman," Townhall is here to clear everything up.

https://townhall.com/columnists/tow...25/we-know-the-definition-of-a-woman-n2605031
Merriam-Webster defines "woman" as "an adult female person." To make sense of that definition, it requires us to define another word, "female." Merriam-Webster defines "female" as "of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs."

In simplified terms, a "woman" is a human being capable of giving birth to another human being.

If that definition is still too confusing or not thorough enough, here are four scientific ways to know if a person is a woman:

– They have XX chromosomes

– They were born with a uterus and ovaries

– They have menstrual / ovarian cycles

– They can give birth to another human being

See, defining "woman" and identifying one isn't so hard after all.
 
This is not about Melania. Besides, she married Trump. The ho didn't marry Willie...because he was already married . She sucked her way into politics. That is a FACT!

Spare me. Harris was single and Brown was separated from his wife for 12 years when they began dating. Kinda like trump dating Melania while he was still married to Marla Maples. It's amusing that you're the morals police only when it involves liberals.
 
Here is a an article by Dan Wootton about him, he's had his pick of elegant beautiful women so I very much doubt that he needed Epstein as a pimp as you're implying.

Prince Andrew ‘has had more than 1,000 lovers’ but does not sleep with teenagers, close friends claim

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9787493/prince-andrew-slept-with-1000-women/

Yet Andy settled the case with Virginia Giuffre for millions. That's MILLIONS, not a token amount. He must have pretty bad lawyers if he's an innocent man. The Guardian has always seen him for what he is.

"This week he agreed to a settlement that states he had “never intended to malign Ms Giuffre’s character” and that he recognised she had “suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks”. Andrew also pledged to “demonstrate his regret for his association” with the sex offender financier Jeffrey Epstein."

https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2022/feb/17/prince-andrew-sexual-assault-case-settlement-podcast
 
Back
Top