Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'

Yet Andy settled the case with Virginia Giuffre for millions. That's MILLIONS, not a token amount. He must have pretty bad lawyers if he's an innocent man. The Guardian has always seen him for what he is.

"This week he agreed to a settlement that states he had “never intended to malign Ms Giuffre’s character” and that he recognised she had “suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks”. Andrew also pledged to “demonstrate his regret for his association” with the sex offender financier Jeffrey Epstein."

https://www.theguardian.com/news/audio/2022/feb/17/prince-andrew-sexual-assault-case-settlement-podcast

Jarod tells us that it's pretty common for American celebrities and politicians to settle out of court. Didn't Bill Clinton do exactly that in the past?

WASHINGTON (AP) - Paula Jones is awaiting the arrival of an $850,000 cheque from President Clinton, bringing an official end to the four-year saga spurred by her allegations of sexual harassment.

Clinton mailed the settlement cheque to Mrs. Jones on Tuesday, even as he braced for the heaviest fallout yet from her harassment suit - an impeachment trial in the Senate.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/1999/jan/13/clinton.usa1
 
Spare me. Harris was single and Brown was separated from his wife for 12 years when they began dating. Kinda like trump dating Melania while he was still married to Marla Maples. It's amusing that you're the morals police only when it involves liberals.

Again, this is not about Melania. The Ho sucked her way up the political ladder. That is a fact. Willie even admits it.
 
With all of this confusion around the definition of "woman," Townhall is here to clear everything up.

https://townhall.com/columnists/tow...25/we-know-the-definition-of-a-woman-n2605031
Merriam-Webster defines "woman" as "an adult female person." To make sense of that definition, it requires us to define another word, "female." Merriam-Webster defines "female" as "of, relating to, or being the sex that typically has the capacity to bear young or produce eggs."

In simplified terms, a "woman" is a human being capable of giving birth to another human being.

If that definition is still too confusing or not thorough enough, here are four scientific ways to know if a person is a woman:

– They have XX chromosomes

– They were born with a uterus and ovaries

– They have menstrual / ovarian cycles

– They can give birth to another human being

See, defining "woman" and identifying one isn't so hard after all.

Lots of women cannot have babies. That definition is crap. It is hard after all. it is also not a fair question to ask a potential supreme judge. 19 percent of married women who try cannot get pregnant after ba year of trying. I guess they do not know they are really men.
 
Lots of women cannot have babies. That definition is crap. It is hard after all. it is also not a fair question to ask a potential supreme judge. 19 percent of married women who try cannot get pregnant after ba year of trying. I guess they do not know they are really men.
but women have the ability to give birth - that's a valid definition that excludes non-women as well
 
How does that make sense? China mistreats LBGT. How is that a winning strategy? What does our stance have to do with world economics?
our misplaced priorities focus on this utterly weird worthless politics
we are not paying attention to the Chinese various economic and spying threats

anytime we are talking pronouns, or gender identity, or CRT or 1619 or any of that is just wasted noise
 
Lots of women cannot have babies. That definition is crap. It is hard after all. it is also not a fair question to ask a potential supreme judge. 19 percent of married women who try cannot get pregnant after ba year of trying. I guess they do not know they are really men.

So, if she can't answer the question, what is she? Is she a woman? A man? Transgender? Sad if she doesn't know...
 
Lots of women cannot have babies. That definition is crap. It is hard after all. it is also not a fair question to ask a potential supreme judge. 19 percent of married women who try cannot get pregnant after ba year of trying. I guess they do not know they are really men.
Its VERY simple females have two X chromosomes (XX) and woman are mature females. Case closed. Doctors aren't Gods they can't create women. They can create a man that has the physical characteristics of a woman but they are not women.
 
So, if she can't answer the question, what is she? Is she a woman? A man? Transgender? Sad if she doesn't know...

She is a judge who never, ever was asked a dumb question like that before. It is not a simple question as this thread shows. She does not jump into a question that is a distraction. It is certainly not a problem in her bailiwick. I guess you should define it for us.
You cannot believe it is a relevant question instead of the gotcha question it is intended to be.
 
She is a judge who never, ever was asked a dumb question like that before. It is not a simple question as this thread shows. She does not jump into a question that is a distraction. It is certainly not a problem in her bailiwick. I guess you should define it for us.
You cannot believe it is a relevant question instead of the gotcha question it is intended to be.

It is most definitely NOT a stupid question. If the case of that freak swimmer comes up to the Supreme Court, she'd better know the difference between a man and a woman. That freak should not be competing with women!
 
She is a judge who never, ever was asked a dumb question like that before. It is not a simple question as this thread shows. She does not jump into a question that is a distraction. It is certainly not a problem in her bailiwick. I guess you should define it for us.
You cannot believe it is a relevant question instead of the gotcha question it is intended to be.

4da95762-284c-4435-9911-1fad561700ae-emma_styand.jpg


Emma Weyant is the best women's swimmer in the 500y freestyle. She is a woman. Too bad a prospective SC judge can't tell the difference...
 
"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman

When it comes to repukes, tRump and his criminal family how's about defining the meaning of treason, sedition and crimes against humanity which includes men, women and children in violation of U.S. Constitutional law in particular.
 
When it comes to repukes, tRump and his criminal family how's about defining the meaning of treason, sedition and crimes against humanity which includes men, women and children in violation of U.S. Constitutional law in particular.



This about a judge that has no clue what a woman is. This has nothing to do with Trump, you ignorant communist :palm:
 
It is most definitely NOT a stupid question. If the case of that freak swimmer comes up to the Supreme Court, she'd better know the difference between a man and a woman. That freak should not be competing with women!

If it does come up, let me know.
 
Its VERY simple females have two X chromosomes (XX) and woman are mature females. Case closed. Doctors aren't Gods they can't create women. They can create a man that has the physical characteristics of a woman but they are not women.

It was a bait question. Stop gaslighting.
 
If it does come up, let me know.

What makes you think it won't come up? A woman was just shafted out of winning a swimming meet by a fucking transgender freak.

If the dumb cunt doesn't know what a woman is, she shouldn't be on ANY court.
 
What makes you think it won't come up? A woman was just shafted out of winning a swimming meet by a fucking transgender freak.

If the dumb cunt doesn't know what a woman is, she shouldn't be on ANY court.

Then fucking talk to that school. They're the one who allowed him.
 
Once more for the cheap seats:

NOT IN THIS CONTEXT, she said, referring to the case being discussed.

Fucking right wing rag like the NY POST does the SOS our resident MAGA minions/racists/right wing wonks do....post misleading headlines despite the content of the article NOT supporting it. They have their talking points and are sticking to them...ALL the facts and logic be damned.

Insipidly stubborn idiots! Reading carefully and comprehensively just isn't in them.

The fact that this thread is a spin off of a piss poor "gotcha" attempt by a MAGA member of Congress is pretty lame.
 
What makes you think it won't come up? A woman was just shafted out of winning a swimming meet by a fucking transgender freak.

If the dumb cunt doesn't know what a woman is, she shouldn't be on ANY court.

the NCAA and the Olympics set standards on who can compete as a woman. they have to have a certain hormone level, and have had it for some time. you can google the specifics. that is a much more complicated answer than she would know without studying it. get it, dipshit?
 
Back
Top