Here's what I don't understand...

No, you didn't answer my question. I asked if money or economic condition would change your religious views and convictions... you said "it is what it is" and that's not an answer to the question.

This is not a debate of my personal knowledge and understanding of Islam, and it certainly doesn't matter what I believe. An argument and basis for a viewpoint must be grounded in reality and based on logical belief.

Arabs and Muslims in certain parts of that region, do not have a choice, if they did, by your reckoning, the women are perfectly fine with being treated as subhuman pieces of property and sending their sons off to blow themselves up in the name of Allah. I don't believe that to be the case.
My economic conditions are such that more money would not cause me to alter my beliefs in any way. I cannot imagine whether my faith would be susceptible to more extreme views if I were to become significantly economically disadvantaged through no fault of my own. I would like to think not, but I cannot say for certain, and neither can you, or anyone else.

Women in Islam are, by and large, NOT treated like subhuman pieces of property. As an aside, in Iraq, prior to our invasion, Iraqi women had the highest level of education and relative economic power in the entire islamic world. The areas where you suggest that muslims do NOT have choices are the areas where the most economic inequity exists. Coincidence? I think not. And again...I could give a DAMN what YOU believe. You believed that Dubya looked hot in blue jeans.
 
Last edited:
NatGeo has been running a special, "Inside alQaeda" which chronicles the rise of the group, and how it came to be. They go into great detail about the relationship with Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, as well as the Taliban, and how they all got to where we are today. It also details American involvement with the Northern Alliance, etc.

What I find interesting is, the nature of radical Islamic extremists, which dominate that part of the world. These are religious fanatics of the worst order, they make Southern Baptists look liberal. Hell, they make Christians look liberal!

Some of the stuff they believe in just blows my mind. To think that some people, quite a few actually, believe this stuff in the 21st century, is amazing! For one thing, they do not believe in 'personal freedom' at all, you are beholden to Allah completely. They do not believe in 'women's rights' at all, women are treated as sub-human, along with anyone else who doesn't live and breathe their particular brand of Islamic faith.

As Western culture has infiltrated their region, they have begun an ongoing battle against the west, which they call "Jihad" and their religious leaders have endorsed the killing of innocent people by any means to promote this agenda. This isn't some isolated group of poor minorities just looking for understanding and tolerance. It isn't some downtrodden group of people who have been discriminated against, who need defending by liberals. It is a fairly large group of very bigoted racist and sexist authoritarians, who wish to impose their religious will on the rest of the world.

When you look at the sheer humanitarian atrocities they have committed, along with the consistent discrimination against women and others who don't share their religious views, how can a rational human being defend them? Homosexuality is punishable by death, women who are guilty of disobedience are executed, anyone suspected of violating the religious edicts, are killed. They have zero tolerance for anything not in compliance with the strict code of Islam, and they have no problem with denying the right to live. In short, these people are maniacal monsters who believe they are ordained by their God to do what they are doing! And it's not just a few of them, it's MILLIONS!

We live in a world that is largely insulated from this extremism, so it is logical that some people may be complacent and just fail to realize the magnitude of the situation here. Some of us are just plain selfish, we don't see why it should compel us to do anything about it, we feel like it's a problem for someone else to have to deal with and we shouldn't get involved. We sit comfortably in a country that guarantees our freedom and rights, and we don't see why we should take action to oppose this sort of thing on behalf of others. It's not our place to intervene, or to try and combat this insanity.

Is this who we are as human beings? Should we sit idly by and watch this injustice happen, and not act? Should we simply refuse to open our eyes to the problem, and pretend it doesn't exist? I feel like there are many on the left who would do just that, and proclaim it is these people's right to live that way, if that's what they want to do. But the thing is, many of them don't want to live that way, they have no other viable alternative. Either you subscribe to radical Islam, or you die and your family dies as well. Should we just shrug and say, it's not my problem? What kind of people are we, if that is the approach we are taking? That is what I don't understand.



Based on Dixie's own evaluation....


<____Islamo Facist______Baptist________Christians_______LIBERALS_____>
 
My economic conditions are such that more money would not cause me to alter my beliefs in any way. I cannot imagine whether my faith would be susceptible to more extreme views if I were to become significantly economically disadvantaged through no fault of my own. I would like to think not, but I cannot say for certain, and neither can you, or anyone else.

Oh yes I can say for certain, my spiritual beliefs wold not change for money. I also don't believe many people of strong religious or spiritual faith, would change their beliefs for money. I think you have failed to make the case for this, as it is not grounded in logic.

Women in Islam are, by and large, NOT treated like subhuman pieces of property. As an aside, in Iraq, prior to our invasion, Iraqi women had the highest level of education and relative economic power in the entire islamic world. The areas where you suggest that muslims do NOT have choices are the areas where the most economic inequity exists. Coincidence? I think not. And again...I could give a DAMN what YOU believe. You believed that Dubya looked hot in blue jeans.

Iraq was secular, not radical Islamic. Even with that, women were not given equal rights, they couldn't vote, for instance. Economic inequity exists because they lack freedom, free enterprise, and free markets. People do not have the liberty to go out and be all they can be, it's not a part of their governmental structure. Radical Islamic viewpoints have nothing to do with promising more personal freedom or anything which would enable greater individual prosperity. It is a RELIGIOUS viewpoint! Again, you fail to make your point because it is devoid of logic.

What I think President Bush looks like, is not a part of this debate, but again... you resort to personal insult and diversion because you are losing the debate. Not only have your excuses for moral cowardice been exposed, you have been exposed as a fraud, that must really suck for you.
 
Oh yes I can say for certain, my spiritual beliefs wold not change for money. I also don't believe many people of strong religious or spiritual faith, would change their beliefs for money. I think you have failed to make the case for this, as it is not grounded in logic.

You did not address my issue. You cannot say whether or not your religious beliefs would become more intense, more radical if you were suddenly deprived of your wealth and economic security by no fault of your own.



Iraq was secular, not radical Islamic. Even with that, women were not given equal rights, they couldn't vote, for instance. Economic inequity exists because they lack freedom, free enterprise, and free markets. People do not have the liberty to go out and be all they can be, it's not a part of their governmental structure. Radical Islamic viewpoints have nothing to do with promising more personal freedom or anything which would enable greater individual prosperity. It is a RELIGIOUS viewpoint! Again, you fail to make your point because it is devoid of logic.

you assume that people gravitate towards radical islam in a vacuum. You cannot prove that at all. I claim that they move towards radical islam because their socio economic situation leaves them feeling angry and vulnerable and radical islam feeds off that anger. YOu cannot disprove that at all.


What I think President Bush looks like, is not a part of this debate, but again... you resort to personal insult and diversion because you are losing the debate. Not only have your excuses for moral cowardice been exposed, you have been exposed as a fraud, that must really suck for you.
you have exposed me as no such thing. I am not trying to INSULT you Dixie...I only point out that I really don't care about what you FEEL or BELIEVE... and I cited an example of a previously stated belief of yours as my rationale for not caring about your warm and fuzzy feelings about anything.

The sum total of your knowledge of islam would fit in a coffee cup with room for a cup of coffee... you rely solely on your "feelings" and try to pass them off as logical. As we both know, I have lived in the region for a significant period of time (measured in years, not in weeks) and worked with the people of the region extensively. My understanding of Islam far exceeds yours and, until you take the time to get out from behind the wall of the green zone, you won't ever develop a knowledge base that can intellectually support your "feelings".
 
But it could very well be extremely naive not to consider it yurt! why limit yourself to only one means in rectifying the problem? poverty is a proven cause of civil unrest that leads to radicals and radical means being accepted...and not just this case....but many.

Arabs in israel love their lives there....they have work and stability for their families.....

arabs in america love it here and are not radical, they have work, money, stability and peace for their families....

i don't think you or dixie or anyone should dismiss this as one of the means in reducing the recruiting power of radical jihad.

care/jd

i have considered it care4, but i do not believe it will work. MM has a radical view of it, he considers it an absolute that it will work and this is what i cannot accept:

and if their economic situation were improved, the number of them who would continue to hold those radical beliefs would radically diminish.

i think those that move to western countries generally have a more moderate view, else, they could not live under western rule. i think with more money the radicals would simply have more money to work with. it is possible it might work, i will grant you that....

since MM keeps running from it, i was wondering if you could address the financial security obl and probably his top commanders have and their radicalness (word?)....

thank you.
 
"since MM keeps running from it, i was wondering if you could address the financial security obl and probably his top commanders have and their radicalness "

You seem to think this is a brilliant point. Naturally, there are exceptions. A guy like Bin Laden would be nowhere without a legion of discontents at his disposal, and poverty is one factor that leads to that discontent. People who are desperate, on any level, are easy to manipulate.

There are others; this is a complex issue, and the roots of terrorism are deep. I reject the notion that there is something inherent in the Middle East or in Islam that leads to it. Poverty is one of the roots of terrorism throughout the world, whether you're talking Ireland, the aryan nation in America or the Middle East.
 
"since MM keeps running from it, i was wondering if you could address the financial security obl and probably his top commanders have and their radicalness "

You seem to think this is a brilliant point. Naturally, there are exceptions. A guy like Bin Laden would be nowhere without a legion of discontents at his disposal, and poverty is one factor that leads to that discontent. People who are desperate, on any level, are easy to manipulate.

There are others; this is a complex issue, and the roots of terrorism are deep. I reject the notion that there is something inherent in the Middle East or in Islam that leads to it. Poverty is one of the roots of terrorism throughout the world, whether you're talking Ireland, the aryan nation in America or the Middle East.

FYI, my old friend, I have little yurtie on ignore and plan to keep him there. I'm not running from anything.
 
"since MM keeps running from it, i was wondering if you could address the financial security obl and probably his top commanders have and their radicalness "

You seem to think this is a brilliant point. Naturally, there are exceptions. A guy like Bin Laden would be nowhere without a legion of discontents at his disposal, and poverty is one factor that leads to that discontent. People who are desperate, on any level, are easy to manipulate.

There are others; this is a complex issue, and the roots of terrorism are deep. I reject the notion that there is something inherent in the Middle East or in Islam that leads to it. Poverty is one of the roots of terrorism throughout the world, whether you're talking Ireland, the aryan nation in America or the Middle East.

it is a brilliant point and flies in the face of the theory that a better economic situatiuon will in fact make muslims less radical. the "exception rule", yes, that really makes your point...then i guess folks like OBL will always be around no matter the economic situation. the hijackers were not overly poor, they were driven by idealogue, not money. if i were to use your logic of stats, then it doesn't matter about money as this only happens ever few decades.

the taliban in afghanstan were decent economically, AQ was doing pretty well, they had bases, arms, money, opium trade....yet none of that stopped their radical beliefs.

can you show me a link where a radical muslim mentioned that his or her economic situation is what caused his or her radical beliefs? in that, it is not their belief in allah and jihad.
 
"can you show me a link where a radical muslim mentioned that his or her economic situation is what caused his or her radical beliefs? in that, it is not their belief in allah and jihad. "

Do you have any idea at all how brain-dead this sounds?

Stick w/ honest deception.
 
"can you show me a link where a radical muslim mentioned that his or her economic situation is what caused his or her radical beliefs? in that, it is not their belief in allah and jihad. "

Do you have any idea at all how brain-dead this sounds?

Stick w/ honest deception.

i guess you can't, thought so....

i rarely use that tactic, but it is fun once in a while :)
 
You did not address my issue. You cannot say whether or not your religious beliefs would become more intense, more radical if you were suddenly deprived of your wealth and economic security by no fault of your own.

My spiritual beliefs would not change in any way, regardless of my economic condition. Again, you appear to be likening radical Islamic terrorism with the Black Panthers or something... like these poor discriminated against minorities became angry at the system and turned to violence... that isn't the case. Radical Islamic viewpoints have absolutely NOTHING to do with economic plight, or what individuals have or don't have! How does harsh discrimination against women, gays, and people of different religious belief, "promise" something greater economically? It simply doesn't! You are attempting to make an argument that can't be supported in logic.

you assume that people gravitate towards radical islam in a vacuum. You cannot prove that at all. I claim that they move towards radical islam because their socio economic situation leaves them feeling angry and vulnerable and radical islam feeds off that anger. YOu cannot disprove that at all.

Again, we are not talking about radical liberal students in the 1960's, maine! Your viewpoints seem to be based on the same catalyst which prompted riots and protests in America 50 years ago, and that is simply split from reality of radical Islam in the 21st century! I can certainly disprove what you are saying, because what you are saying doesn't comport with logic! Radical Islam doesn't promise better economic conditions for individuals. It is largely in opposition to material wealth brought by western civilization!

you have exposed me as no such thing. I am not trying to INSULT you Dixie...I only point out that I really don't care about what you FEEL or BELIEVE... and I cited an example of a previously stated belief of yours as my rationale for not caring about your warm and fuzzy feelings about anything.

Yes, I have soundly refuted your viewpoints which are not rooted in logic or reality. I have illustrated how devoid of logic they are, and how they fail the test of logic and reason on every count. These people feel a religious moral obligation to propagate a 5th century viewpoint of Islam because they feel western civilization has encroached on their discriminatory, racist, sexist, and homophobic culture. It has nothing to do with wealth, as was pointed out, their main #1 leading proponent comes from a family of wealth! It has nothing to do with personal freedom, radical Islam doesn't advocate personal freedom!

The sum total of your knowledge of islam would fit in a coffee cup with room for a cup of coffee... you rely solely on your "feelings" and try to pass them off as logical. As we both know, I have lived in the region for a significant period of time (measured in years, not in weeks) and worked with the people of the region extensively. My understanding of Islam far exceeds yours and, until you take the time to get out from behind the wall of the green zone, you won't ever develop a knowledge base that can intellectually support your "feelings".

I don't give a shit how much you THINK you know, or how much you THINK I don't know! That is not the debate here! If you want to strut around acting like you are some big man who knows more than the rest of us, that's fine, but you haven't proven that in this thread. If anything, you have proven you know nothing about radical Islam or what fuels it. You are stuck like a broken record, on 1960's American counter-culture, and you presume radical Islamics are like radical Hippies, they just want socio-economic change, and we (the establishment) are standing in their way! It's absurd at best, and I think it is borderline insane, to believe radical Islam has anything to do with economic conditions, or the promise of individual betterment and a better way of life.

If you could imagine devout Southern Baptists becoming fed up with the liberal culture of today, abortion, gay rights, etc... and they took up arms and began preaching a message of militant defiance against those who don't subscribe to the Southern Baptist doctrine, killing all who opposed them, forcing their radical religious views on the rest of society, blowing themselves up to kill liberals and Atheists in San Francisco... THEN, you could get an idea of what radical Islam is all about! IF that were happening, what kind of foolish idiot would you be, to claim it was rooted in "economic conditions" and we just need to try and understand their plight?

You are a fucking idiot, if this is what you believe. Now, granted, in America, you are entirely within your rights to be a fucking idiot, but don't expect me to buy into your idiocy. I personally don't think you are that stupid, I think you believe the rest of us are stupid enough to buy into the idiocy you have spouted here. Why you are doing it, is what I don't understand. I guess in your case, it is complete moral cowardice. An unwillingness to stand up to what you know is wrong and despicable, and instead, propagate some sort of idiotic alternative viewpoint which is not rooted in logic or reality.
 
Why would someone ever say that their poverty is what caused their radical beliefs?

Poverty makes people easy to manipulate. That's the point.
 
wow...you are long winded. I really have no desire to communicate with you in novelettes. Radical Islam is fueled by economic hardship and dictatorial government. That is a fact. The vast majority of the muslims in this world do NOT ascribe to that philosophy. That is also a fact.
 
Why would someone ever say that their poverty is what caused their radical beliefs?

Poverty makes people easy to manipulate. That's the point.

YOU said it. if no one would ever say it, why is it YOU say it? how do you explain that obl is not poor and i don't believe any of the 19 hijackers were poor. some were students here. do you have evidence that the the hijackers were motivated by their economic situation rather than their idea of islam? i would like to see it.

contrary to maine, it is NOT a fact. it is an opinion, but i wouldn't expect him to know the difference.
 
Back
Top