If the Republicans wanted an outsider why did they not go with Randall Paul?
While I don't agree with him generally, he is a free thinker who is beyond the usual Washington, D.C. crap. He speaks his mind, he is intelligent, is it because he does not have the hint of Xenophobia they love in Trump?
Why not Fiorina? She is a Washington, D.C. outsider, a true conservative (unlike Trump), and she surely speaks her mind. No hint of Xenophobia, but she is a split tail.
There were better and more Conservative options if it was an outsider they wanted. I don't buy the standard party line that Trump is so popular due to his outsider status or because he is not PC and speaks his mind. He has taped into a frustrated vein or racist and xenophobic Americans who are frustrated because it is no longer acceptable to have such ideas.
Once Trump gets the nomination, watch him veer strongly left, chose a leftist VP and make a serious run at winning. I simply hate to see America turn backward toward the fear of our minorities.
While I don't agree with him generally, he is a free thinker who is beyond the usual Washington, D.C. crap. He speaks his mind, he is intelligent, is it because he does not have the hint of Xenophobia they love in Trump?
Why not Fiorina? She is a Washington, D.C. outsider, a true conservative (unlike Trump), and she surely speaks her mind. No hint of Xenophobia, but she is a split tail.
There were better and more Conservative options if it was an outsider they wanted. I don't buy the standard party line that Trump is so popular due to his outsider status or because he is not PC and speaks his mind. He has taped into a frustrated vein or racist and xenophobic Americans who are frustrated because it is no longer acceptable to have such ideas.
Once Trump gets the nomination, watch him veer strongly left, chose a leftist VP and make a serious run at winning. I simply hate to see America turn backward toward the fear of our minorities.