Legislating morality

You mean 12. But again, the "slipper" slope argument. LOL!

Once again you revert back to your old ways.

It is not a slippery slope if it is a prediction made based on documented trends.

Years of polling shows a steady increase in the number of people who support gay marriage. That they then vote for, or elect people who will vote for, gay marriage is not surprising.
 
The fact that I brought up a type shows that I also have a sense of humor. If find yours, however, lacking, and an indication that that's all YOU have.

You brought up a "type"? Hmm, I thought it was a typo.

And your sense of humor, especially towards me, is not about laughs but about attempts to mock of insult. But carry on. It proves my point more often than not.
 
Do you think procreation the only benefit the state gets from married couples? Increasing population is not always a benefit to the state. And there are many other benefits from having married couples.


I just want to say what an absolutely FABULOUS job you are doing of keeping DY chasing his tale.

It has been an absolute JOY watching DY twist and squirm and contort his various excuses to fit the bullshit he's spewing, all while contorting his narrative to try and defend his hypocrisy.

This has been some true prime time entertainment and it can only get better the longer DY continues with his nonsense.
 
Is if it happened in the past, and is not happening right now, its not a good example...? Seriously? You are desperate to confuse the issue and not talk about the subject.


The only way DY can continue is if he keeps up with his obfuscatory nonsense.
 
quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869.jpg
 
Back
Top